Role of configuration factor on bond strength of universal adhesives in occlusal cavities: An in vitro study.

Pushpal Ingle, S R Srinidhi, Laxmikant Late, Sayujya Tandon
{"title":"Role of configuration factor on bond strength of universal adhesives in occlusal cavities: An <i>in vitro</i> study.","authors":"Pushpal Ingle, S R Srinidhi, Laxmikant Late, Sayujya Tandon","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_247_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During curing of composite resins, polymerization shrinkage occurs and generates stress. The configuration factor (C-factors) is an important clinical parameter and is related to polymerization shrinkage, bond strength, and durability. High C-factors indicate situations in which the material polymerizes under greater external constraint.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of C-factor on the bond strength of universal dental adhesives to the dentin of the cavity floor and cavity wall in class-I composite restorations using nanohybrid composites.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty noncarious human molars were randomly divided into four groups (<i>n</i> = 15). Then, each group was subdivided into two subgroups according to the type of adhesive used: Prime and Bond Universal (Dentsply) or Adper Single Bond 2 (3M). After the bonding procedure, nanohybrid composite was applied in 2 mm increments to fill the cavities. The teeth were sectioned into 2 mm<sup>2</sup> sticks and micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) was measured at two areas: cavity wall and cavity floor using a universal testing machine. Fracture pattern was analyzed using the stereomicroscope. Results were tabulated and statistical analysis was done using the Analysis of Variance with <i>post hoc</i> Tukey's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prime and Bond Universal had significantly better μTBS (mean = 8.53) as compared to Adper Single Bond 2 at the floor (mean = 6.64) of the cavity. At the wall of the cavity, Prime and Bond Universal was better, but the difference was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The cohesive mode of fracture was common in all the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To overcome high C-factor in Class I cavities, Prime and Bond universal had better bond strength when measured at the floor and wall of the cavity.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"28 6","pages":"559-564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_247_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During curing of composite resins, polymerization shrinkage occurs and generates stress. The configuration factor (C-factors) is an important clinical parameter and is related to polymerization shrinkage, bond strength, and durability. High C-factors indicate situations in which the material polymerizes under greater external constraint.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of C-factor on the bond strength of universal dental adhesives to the dentin of the cavity floor and cavity wall in class-I composite restorations using nanohybrid composites.

Materials and methods: Sixty noncarious human molars were randomly divided into four groups (n = 15). Then, each group was subdivided into two subgroups according to the type of adhesive used: Prime and Bond Universal (Dentsply) or Adper Single Bond 2 (3M). After the bonding procedure, nanohybrid composite was applied in 2 mm increments to fill the cavities. The teeth were sectioned into 2 mm2 sticks and micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) was measured at two areas: cavity wall and cavity floor using a universal testing machine. Fracture pattern was analyzed using the stereomicroscope. Results were tabulated and statistical analysis was done using the Analysis of Variance with post hoc Tukey's test.

Results: Prime and Bond Universal had significantly better μTBS (mean = 8.53) as compared to Adper Single Bond 2 at the floor (mean = 6.64) of the cavity. At the wall of the cavity, Prime and Bond Universal was better, but the difference was not statistically significant (P < 0.05). The cohesive mode of fracture was common in all the groups.

Conclusion: To overcome high C-factor in Class I cavities, Prime and Bond universal had better bond strength when measured at the floor and wall of the cavity.

形态因子对牙合腔万能粘接剂结合强度影响的体外研究。
简介:复合树脂在固化过程中发生聚合收缩,产生应力。构型因子(c因子)是一个重要的临床参数,与聚合收缩、粘结强度和耐久性有关。高c因子表明材料在更大的外部约束下聚合的情况。目的:评价纳米复合材料ⅰ类复合修复体中c因子对万能牙粘接剂与牙本质、牙本质、牙本质结合强度的影响。材料与方法:60颗无龋人磨牙随机分为4组(n = 15)。然后,根据所使用的粘合剂类型将每组再细分为两个亚组:Prime and Bond Universal (Dentsply)或Adper Single Bond 2 (3M)。在键合过程完成后,纳米复合材料以2毫米的增量填充空腔。将牙切成2 mm2的小棒,利用万能试验机在腔壁和腔底两个区域测量微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)。用体视显微镜对断裂模式进行了分析。将结果制成表格,并采用方差分析和事后Tukey检验进行统计分析。结果:Prime和Bond Universal在空腔底部的μTBS(平均= 8.53)明显优于Adper Single Bond 2(平均= 6.64)。在腔壁上,Prime和Bond Universal较优,但差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。骨折内聚模式在所有组中都很常见。结论:为克服I类牙槽高c因子的问题,Prime和Bond universal在牙槽底和牙槽壁处均具有较好的粘结强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信