Exploring Willingness: What Drives Dialysis Withdrawal Decisions in Patients With End-stage Renal Disease? A Cross-sectional Study.

Cheng-Pei Lin, Jung-Chi Lee, Chi-Feng Pan, Yu-Chi Chen
{"title":"Exploring Willingness: What Drives Dialysis Withdrawal Decisions in Patients With End-stage Renal Disease? A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Cheng-Pei Lin, Jung-Chi Lee, Chi-Feng Pan, Yu-Chi Chen","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Withdrawal from dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) can mitigate futile treatments and facilitate early end-of-life care preparation. However, the reasons patients willingly withdraw from elective dialysis under varying disease prognoses, and the factors that influence these decisions, remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the factors influencing the willingness to electively withdraw from dialysis in patients with ESRD at different disease prognoses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in accordance with Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Using convenience sampling, patients aged ≥ 45 who had regularly undergone hemodialysis for more than 6 months were recruited from a medical center and a local clinic. We used structured questionnaires and chart reviews to collect data from February to April 2021. Descriptive analysis, Pearson's correlations, and stepwise regression were employed to assess willingness to electively withdraw from dialysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 121 participants enrolled were of an average age of 61.09 years, had undergone dialysis for 7 years, and had a median of four comorbidities. Willingness to withdraw from dialysis increased as their disease worsened. However, more than half preferred to continue dialysis, with the number of patients decreasing from 76% to 53.7% across the disease deterioration trajectory. The participants identified nephrologists as the most influential individuals in their dialysis withdrawal discussions. Factors associated with dialysis withdrawal decisions across all hypothetical prognosis scenarios (current disease conditions, irreversible complications, and estimated survival < 6 mo) included poor quality of dialysis, lower educational level (junior high school), and better knowledge of palliative care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for future practice: </strong>Willingness to withdraw from dialysis is associated with dialysis quality, educational level, and palliative care knowledge under different hypothetical prognosis scenarios. Nephrologists play a pivotal role in initiating withdrawal discussions and influencing decision-making. Health care providers should consider these factors during routine renal nursing care and identify the appropriate time to initiate advanced care planning discussions. Regular monitoring of dialysis-related symptoms and quality (measured by Kt/V) and evaluating patients' understanding of palliative care are both essential in ESRD care. As primary caregivers, nurses play a crucial role in integrating these assessments into routine care to identify patients considering dialysis withdrawal. Collaborative efforts between nurses and nephrologists are vital to initiate timely end-of-life care discussions and preparations, improve patient-centered care, and improve end-of-life outcomes in ESRD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94242,"journal":{"name":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Withdrawal from dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) can mitigate futile treatments and facilitate early end-of-life care preparation. However, the reasons patients willingly withdraw from elective dialysis under varying disease prognoses, and the factors that influence these decisions, remain unclear.

Purpose: To explore the factors influencing the willingness to electively withdraw from dialysis in patients with ESRD at different disease prognoses.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in accordance with Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Using convenience sampling, patients aged ≥ 45 who had regularly undergone hemodialysis for more than 6 months were recruited from a medical center and a local clinic. We used structured questionnaires and chart reviews to collect data from February to April 2021. Descriptive analysis, Pearson's correlations, and stepwise regression were employed to assess willingness to electively withdraw from dialysis.

Results: The 121 participants enrolled were of an average age of 61.09 years, had undergone dialysis for 7 years, and had a median of four comorbidities. Willingness to withdraw from dialysis increased as their disease worsened. However, more than half preferred to continue dialysis, with the number of patients decreasing from 76% to 53.7% across the disease deterioration trajectory. The participants identified nephrologists as the most influential individuals in their dialysis withdrawal discussions. Factors associated with dialysis withdrawal decisions across all hypothetical prognosis scenarios (current disease conditions, irreversible complications, and estimated survival < 6 mo) included poor quality of dialysis, lower educational level (junior high school), and better knowledge of palliative care.

Conclusions/implications for future practice: Willingness to withdraw from dialysis is associated with dialysis quality, educational level, and palliative care knowledge under different hypothetical prognosis scenarios. Nephrologists play a pivotal role in initiating withdrawal discussions and influencing decision-making. Health care providers should consider these factors during routine renal nursing care and identify the appropriate time to initiate advanced care planning discussions. Regular monitoring of dialysis-related symptoms and quality (measured by Kt/V) and evaluating patients' understanding of palliative care are both essential in ESRD care. As primary caregivers, nurses play a crucial role in integrating these assessments into routine care to identify patients considering dialysis withdrawal. Collaborative efforts between nurses and nephrologists are vital to initiate timely end-of-life care discussions and preparations, improve patient-centered care, and improve end-of-life outcomes in ESRD management.

探索意愿:是什么驱动终末期肾病患者退出透析的决定?横断面研究。
背景:终末期肾病(ESRD)患者退出透析可以减轻无效的治疗,并促进早期临终关怀准备。然而,在不同的疾病预后下,患者自愿退出选择性透析的原因,以及影响这些决定的因素,仍不清楚。目的:探讨不同疾病预后的ESRD患者选择性退出透析意愿的影响因素。方法:本横断面观察性研究按照加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)指南进行。采用方便抽样方法,从医疗中心和当地诊所招募年龄≥45岁、定期接受血液透析6个月以上的患者。我们使用结构化问卷调查和图表回顾来收集2021年2月至4月的数据。采用描述性分析、Pearson相关性和逐步回归来评估选择性退出透析的意愿。结果:121名参与者的平均年龄为61.09岁,接受透析治疗7年,平均有4个合并症。随着病情恶化,退出透析的意愿增加。然而,超过一半的患者倾向于继续透析,在疾病恶化的过程中,患者数量从76%下降到53.7%。参与者认为肾病学家是他们透析退出讨论中最有影响力的人。在所有假设的预后情景(当前疾病状况、不可逆并发症和估计生存期< 6个月)中,与退出透析决定相关的因素包括透析质量差、低教育水平(初中)和更好的姑息治疗知识。结论/对未来实践的启示:在不同假设的预后情景下,退出透析的意愿与透析质量、教育水平和姑息治疗知识相关。肾病学家在启动退出讨论和影响决策方面发挥着关键作用。卫生保健提供者应在常规肾脏护理中考虑这些因素,并确定适当的时间启动高级护理计划讨论。定期监测透析相关症状和质量(以Kt/V衡量)以及评估患者对姑息治疗的理解在ESRD护理中都是必不可少的。作为主要护理人员,护士在将这些评估纳入常规护理以确定考虑退出透析的患者方面发挥着至关重要的作用。护士和肾病学家之间的合作对于及时启动临终关怀讨论和准备,改善以患者为中心的护理,改善ESRD管理的临终结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信