Impact of Thread Fabrication Methods on Abutment Screw Loosening in Dental Implants: An In Vitro Experimental Study.

IF 1.7
Serkan Aktas, Abdulrahman Al-Sanea, Talip Celik, Yasin Kisioglu
{"title":"Impact of Thread Fabrication Methods on Abutment Screw Loosening in Dental Implants: An In Vitro Experimental Study.","authors":"Serkan Aktas, Abdulrahman Al-Sanea, Talip Celik, Yasin Kisioglu","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the influence of different thread manufacturing techniques, including machining, thread rolling, and die cutting, on the mechanical stability of abutment screws in dental implants. It also evaluated the role of internal threading processes in implants (cut vs. form tapping) on torque loss behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Abutment screws and implants were fabricated using three screw manufacturing techniques and two internal thread forming methods, respectively. The screw-implant assemblies were tested under two conditions: (i) immediately after tightening to simulate initial mechanical adaptation, and (ii) after dynamic loading to simulate functional use. Thread morphology was assessed using profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), while torque loss was quantified with a digital torque meter. Surface roughness and thread geometry were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Machined screws exhibited superior torque retention in both scenarios, especially when paired with form-tapped implants. Die-cut screws consistently showed the highest torque loss, correlating with greater surface defects and dimensional variability. SEM revealed pronounced flank damage and debris in die-cut and thread-rolled screws. Surface roughness values aligned only partially with observed surface morphology. Thread manufacturing method and internal thread formation both significantly affected preload stability (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The thread manufacturing method is a critical factor in the mechanical performance of abutment screws. Machined screws provided the most consistent outcomes, while die-formed screws posed mechanical disadvantages due to inferior thread quality. These findings have clinical implications for improving the long-term stability of implant-supported restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the influence of different thread manufacturing techniques, including machining, thread rolling, and die cutting, on the mechanical stability of abutment screws in dental implants. It also evaluated the role of internal threading processes in implants (cut vs. form tapping) on torque loss behavior.

Methods: Abutment screws and implants were fabricated using three screw manufacturing techniques and two internal thread forming methods, respectively. The screw-implant assemblies were tested under two conditions: (i) immediately after tightening to simulate initial mechanical adaptation, and (ii) after dynamic loading to simulate functional use. Thread morphology was assessed using profilometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), while torque loss was quantified with a digital torque meter. Surface roughness and thread geometry were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α = 0.05).

Results: Machined screws exhibited superior torque retention in both scenarios, especially when paired with form-tapped implants. Die-cut screws consistently showed the highest torque loss, correlating with greater surface defects and dimensional variability. SEM revealed pronounced flank damage and debris in die-cut and thread-rolled screws. Surface roughness values aligned only partially with observed surface morphology. Thread manufacturing method and internal thread formation both significantly affected preload stability (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The thread manufacturing method is a critical factor in the mechanical performance of abutment screws. Machined screws provided the most consistent outcomes, while die-formed screws posed mechanical disadvantages due to inferior thread quality. These findings have clinical implications for improving the long-term stability of implant-supported restorations.

螺纹制作方法对种植牙基牙螺钉松动影响的体外实验研究。
目的:研究不同螺纹制造工艺对种植体基牙螺钉机械稳定性的影响,包括机械加工、螺纹滚压和模切。它还评估了内螺纹工艺在植入物(切割与成形攻丝)中对扭矩损失行为的作用。方法:分别采用三种螺钉制造工艺和两种内螺纹成形方法制作基牙螺钉和种植体。螺钉-种植体组件在两种条件下进行测试:(i)在拧紧后立即模拟初始机械适应,(ii)在动态加载后模拟功能使用。使用轮廓术和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估螺纹形态,同时使用数字扭矩计量化扭矩损失。表面粗糙度和螺纹几何形状采用单因素方差分析和Tukey HSD检验进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。结果:机械螺钉在两种情况下都表现出优异的扭矩保持力,特别是当与形式自攻种植体配对时。模切螺丝始终显示出最高的扭矩损失,与更大的表面缺陷和尺寸变化相关。扫描电镜显示明显的侧面损伤和碎片的模切和螺纹滚螺丝。表面粗糙度值仅与观察到的表面形貌部分一致。螺纹制作方法和内螺纹形成对预载稳定性均有显著影响(p < 0.05)。结论:螺纹制作方法是影响基台螺钉力学性能的关键因素。机加工螺钉提供最一致的结果,而模具成型螺钉由于螺纹质量较差而造成机械缺点。这些发现对提高种植体支持修复体的长期稳定性具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信