Prevalence of Tuberculosis among migrants under national screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Qin Chen, Ningjun Ren, Shengya Liu, Zixin Qian, Mengdie Li, Aliyu Mustapha, Wei Luo, Jinghua Li, Wenxi Wang, Chun Hao
{"title":"Prevalence of Tuberculosis among migrants under national screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Qin Chen, Ningjun Ren, Shengya Liu, Zixin Qian, Mengdie Li, Aliyu Mustapha, Wei Luo, Jinghua Li, Wenxi Wang, Chun Hao","doi":"10.1186/s41256-025-00424-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculosis (TB) continues to pose a significant global public health threat, particularly among migrant populations. Screening policies exist in many receiving countries but differ markedly, and there is limited pooled evidence on TB and latent TB infection (LTBI) prevalence among migrants under different screening frameworks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize TB and LTBI prevalence among migrants and compared national screening policies to inform evidence-based public health planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published 2016-2023. Random-effects models generated pooled prevalence estimates with 95% CIs; subgroup analyses examined differences by screening stage, migrant category, and country-of-origin incidence. Sensitivity analyses tested robustness. Government and health-agency websites were systematically examined and scored to table national TB-screening requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36 studies (26 TB, 21 LTBI) covering 40,738,331 migrants screened met inclusion criteria. The Pooled TB prevalence was 214.52/100,000 (95% CI 112.18-349.66) and LTBI prevalence 14.9% (95% CI 9.91-20.60). Countries employing both pre-entry screening and subsequent post-entry surveillance achieved the lowest TB prevalence (94.09/100,000). The highest burdens occurred among refugees/asylum seekers (439.25/100,000) and migrants from countries with TB incidence 300-499/100,000 (491.96/100,000). LTBI was most common when identified through post-entry screening (21.90%), those with multiple migrants (18.11%), and among migrants originating from countries with ≥ 500/100,000 TB incidence (30.90%). Policy comparison showed pre-entry screening is almost universal; the United States is the only country mandating systematic LTBI screening. Screening-scope scores were highest in traditional immigrant countries (16-20), intermediate in middle-income destinations such as China and Malaysia (10-14), and lowest in Nordic (4-8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasizes the importance of targeted TB screening, especially for migrants from high-prevalence regions and at-risk populations. Comprehensive pre- and post-entry TB screening, along with strengthened latent TB screening and surveillance for diverse migrant populations, is essential. Meanwhile enhanced collaboration to update screening policies are key to achieving the goal of TB eradication and provide practical insights for effective TB control.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"10 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-025-00424-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) continues to pose a significant global public health threat, particularly among migrant populations. Screening policies exist in many receiving countries but differ markedly, and there is limited pooled evidence on TB and latent TB infection (LTBI) prevalence among migrants under different screening frameworks. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize TB and LTBI prevalence among migrants and compared national screening policies to inform evidence-based public health planning.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published 2016-2023. Random-effects models generated pooled prevalence estimates with 95% CIs; subgroup analyses examined differences by screening stage, migrant category, and country-of-origin incidence. Sensitivity analyses tested robustness. Government and health-agency websites were systematically examined and scored to table national TB-screening requirements.

Results: 36 studies (26 TB, 21 LTBI) covering 40,738,331 migrants screened met inclusion criteria. The Pooled TB prevalence was 214.52/100,000 (95% CI 112.18-349.66) and LTBI prevalence 14.9% (95% CI 9.91-20.60). Countries employing both pre-entry screening and subsequent post-entry surveillance achieved the lowest TB prevalence (94.09/100,000). The highest burdens occurred among refugees/asylum seekers (439.25/100,000) and migrants from countries with TB incidence 300-499/100,000 (491.96/100,000). LTBI was most common when identified through post-entry screening (21.90%), those with multiple migrants (18.11%), and among migrants originating from countries with ≥ 500/100,000 TB incidence (30.90%). Policy comparison showed pre-entry screening is almost universal; the United States is the only country mandating systematic LTBI screening. Screening-scope scores were highest in traditional immigrant countries (16-20), intermediate in middle-income destinations such as China and Malaysia (10-14), and lowest in Nordic (4-8).

Conclusions: This study emphasizes the importance of targeted TB screening, especially for migrants from high-prevalence regions and at-risk populations. Comprehensive pre- and post-entry TB screening, along with strengthened latent TB screening and surveillance for diverse migrant populations, is essential. Meanwhile enhanced collaboration to update screening policies are key to achieving the goal of TB eradication and provide practical insights for effective TB control.

国家筛查计划下移民结核病患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:结核病(TB)继续构成重大的全球公共卫生威胁,特别是在移民人口中。许多接收国都有筛查政策,但差异很大,而且在不同筛查框架下移民中结核病和潜伏结核感染(LTBI)流行的综合证据有限。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在综合移民中结核病和LTBI的患病率,并比较国家筛查政策,为循证公共卫生规划提供信息。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library 2016-2023年发表的研究。随机效应模型产生95% ci的合并患病率估计值;亚组分析检查了筛查阶段、移民类别和原籍国发病率的差异。敏感性分析检验了稳健性。系统地检查了政府和卫生机构的网站,并对其进行了评分,以列出国家结核病筛查要求。结果:36项研究(26项结核病,21项LTBI)涵盖40,738,331名移民,符合纳入标准。合并结核患病率为214.52/100,000 (95% CI 112.18-349.66), LTBI患病率为14.9% (95% CI 9.91-20.60)。同时采用入境前筛查和入境后监测的国家实现了最低的结核病患病率(94.09/10万)。难民/寻求庇护者(439.25/10万)和来自结核病发病率为300-499/10万(491.96/10万)国家的移民负担最高。通过入境后筛查发现的LTBI最常见(21.90%),多移民者(18.11%),以及来自结核病发病率≥500/100,000的国家的移民(30.90%)。政策比较表明,入境前筛查几乎是普遍的;美国是唯一强制进行系统性LTBI筛查的国家。筛查范围得分最高的是传统移民国家(16-20),中等收入目的地如中国和马来西亚(10-14)处于中等水平,最低的是北欧(4-8)。结论:本研究强调了有针对性的结核病筛查的重要性,特别是对来自高流行地区和高危人群的移民。全面的入境前和入境后结核病筛查,以及加强对不同移民人口的潜伏性结核病筛查和监测至关重要。同时,加强合作以更新筛查政策是实现根除结核病目标的关键,并为有效控制结核病提供实际见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信