Latent Classes of Adolescent Trauma Exposure, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms, and Substance Use Predict Clinical Diagnoses at 12-Month Follow-Up.

Q1 Psychology
Chronic Stress Pub Date : 2025-06-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/24705470251350144
John Leri, Josh M Cisler, Shaunna L Clark, Cody G Dodd, Saman Siddiqui, Leslie Taylor, Alexa Ayala, Sunita Stewart, Robyn Richmond, Jeffrey D Shahidullah, Justin F Rousseau, John M Hettema, D Jeffrey Newport, Karen D Wagner, Charles B Nemeroff
{"title":"Latent Classes of Adolescent Trauma Exposure, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms, and Substance Use Predict Clinical Diagnoses at 12-Month Follow-Up.","authors":"John Leri, Josh M Cisler, Shaunna L Clark, Cody G Dodd, Saman Siddiqui, Leslie Taylor, Alexa Ayala, Sunita Stewart, Robyn Richmond, Jeffrey D Shahidullah, Justin F Rousseau, John M Hettema, D Jeffrey Newport, Karen D Wagner, Charles B Nemeroff","doi":"10.1177/24705470251350144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance use commonly co-occur among youth. Identifying specific subgroups of youth based on unique constellations across these domains may provide a novel way to identify and target youth at prospective risk for specific types of negative clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Trauma exposed youth completed structured clinical assessments as part of a longitudinal study (<i>N</i> = 1826; ages 13-21). Latent class analyses identified distinct subgroups of youth based on lifetime trauma histories and current PTSD symptom and substance use inventories collected at the baseline study visit. Logistic regression analyses determined if the latent classes were associated with elevated risk for PTSD or substance use disorder (SUD) diagnoses as the 12-month follow-up study visit (<i>n</i> = 1029). Logistic regression models controlled for baseline clinical characteristics and demographic factors in a stepwise fashion to elucidate if latent classes carried conferred risk beyond established risk factors. Sensitivity analyses included latent profile analyses and predictive modeling with an alternative number of latent classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four latent classes were identified which differentiated participants based on the type of trauma exposure, the number of PTSD symptoms endorsed, and the propensity to be engaged in polysubstance use. Latent classes which were characterized by exposure to interpersonal violence at the baseline study visit had an elevated risk of PTSD 12 months later, relative to the latent class which was principally exposed to incidental trauma (odds ratios ranged from 4.11-5.88). Likewise, a distinct latent class which was characterized by poly-substance use at the baseline study visit had an elevated risk of SUD diagnoses at the 12-month follow-up (odds ratio = 2.48). The findings were robust to sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results highlight nuanced patterns of co-occurrences between trauma exposure, PTSD symptomatology, and substance use that differentiate unique sub-groups of youth at varying degrees of risk for negative clinical outcomes one year later. Evaluating the co-expression of trauma and psychopathology inventories, as opposed to only assessing the summative epidemiological indices of these constructs, may help identify adolescents who are most at risk for sustaining deleterious health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":52315,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Stress","volume":"9 ","pages":"24705470251350144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24705470251350144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trauma exposure, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance use commonly co-occur among youth. Identifying specific subgroups of youth based on unique constellations across these domains may provide a novel way to identify and target youth at prospective risk for specific types of negative clinical outcomes.

Methods: Trauma exposed youth completed structured clinical assessments as part of a longitudinal study (N = 1826; ages 13-21). Latent class analyses identified distinct subgroups of youth based on lifetime trauma histories and current PTSD symptom and substance use inventories collected at the baseline study visit. Logistic regression analyses determined if the latent classes were associated with elevated risk for PTSD or substance use disorder (SUD) diagnoses as the 12-month follow-up study visit (n = 1029). Logistic regression models controlled for baseline clinical characteristics and demographic factors in a stepwise fashion to elucidate if latent classes carried conferred risk beyond established risk factors. Sensitivity analyses included latent profile analyses and predictive modeling with an alternative number of latent classes.

Results: Four latent classes were identified which differentiated participants based on the type of trauma exposure, the number of PTSD symptoms endorsed, and the propensity to be engaged in polysubstance use. Latent classes which were characterized by exposure to interpersonal violence at the baseline study visit had an elevated risk of PTSD 12 months later, relative to the latent class which was principally exposed to incidental trauma (odds ratios ranged from 4.11-5.88). Likewise, a distinct latent class which was characterized by poly-substance use at the baseline study visit had an elevated risk of SUD diagnoses at the 12-month follow-up (odds ratio = 2.48). The findings were robust to sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: These results highlight nuanced patterns of co-occurrences between trauma exposure, PTSD symptomatology, and substance use that differentiate unique sub-groups of youth at varying degrees of risk for negative clinical outcomes one year later. Evaluating the co-expression of trauma and psychopathology inventories, as opposed to only assessing the summative epidemiological indices of these constructs, may help identify adolescents who are most at risk for sustaining deleterious health outcomes.

青少年创伤暴露的潜在类别、创伤后应激障碍症状和物质使用预测12个月随访的临床诊断。
背景:创伤暴露、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和物质使用通常同时发生在青少年中。根据这些领域的独特星座来确定特定的青年亚群,可能为识别和瞄准特定类型的负面临床结果的潜在风险的青年提供一种新的方法。方法:创伤暴露青年完成结构化临床评估作为纵向研究的一部分(N = 1826;年龄13-21)。潜在类别分析根据在基线研究访问中收集的终生创伤史和当前创伤后应激障碍症状和物质使用清单确定了不同的青年亚组。在12个月的随访研究访问中,逻辑回归分析确定潜在类别是否与PTSD或物质使用障碍(SUD)诊断的高风险相关(n = 1029)。逻辑回归模型以逐步方式控制基线临床特征和人口统计学因素,以阐明潜在类别是否携带超出既定风险因素的授予风险。敏感性分析包括潜在特征分析和预测模型与潜在类别的备选数量。结果:确定了四个潜在类别,根据创伤暴露类型,认可的创伤后应激障碍症状数量以及从事多种物质使用的倾向来区分参与者。在基线研究访问时暴露于人际暴力的潜在类别相对于主要暴露于偶然创伤的潜在类别,在12个月后患PTSD的风险较高(优势比范围为4.11-5.88)。同样,在基线研究访问时以多物质使用为特征的一个明显的潜在类别在12个月的随访中诊断为SUD的风险升高(优势比= 2.48)。这些发现在敏感性分析中是稳健的。结论:这些结果突出了创伤暴露、创伤后应激障碍症状学和物质使用之间共同出现的细微模式,这些模式区分了一年后具有不同程度负面临床结果风险的独特青年亚组。评估创伤和精神病理学量表的共同表达,而不是仅仅评估这些结构的总结性流行病学指数,可能有助于确定哪些青少年最有可能持续有害的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Stress
Chronic Stress Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信