The cognitive burden of epilepsy: Assessing executive dysfunction in adult patients.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Reyhane Soleymani, Nafiseh Jahangiri Zarkani, Ali Amini Harandi, Hossein Pakdaman
{"title":"The cognitive burden of epilepsy: Assessing executive dysfunction in adult patients.","authors":"Reyhane Soleymani, Nafiseh Jahangiri Zarkani, Ali Amini Harandi, Hossein Pakdaman","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2519998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Executive functions are frequently impaired in individuals with epilepsy. Understanding the patterns of these dysfunctions is essential for effective management of epileptic patients. To comprehend these patterns, we aimed to investigate executive function performance in adult epileptic patients. Thirty adults with epilepsy, along with fifty healthy controls matched for age, gender, and education were administered standard performance-based executive tasks, including Digit Span Forward and Backward, Trail Making Test A and B, Design Fluency Regular and Irregular, and Semantic Verbal Fluency. Results indicated that Digit Span Forward and Backward tests were the most frequently impaired, with 80% and 90% of patients showing impairments, respectively. The Semantic Verbal Fluency task had the lowest frequency of impairment, with a 30% prevalence among patients. Additionally, a higher frequency of seizures significantly predicted longer completion times for Trail Making Test A (beta = 0.281, <i>p</i> = 0.030) and Trail Making Test B (beta = 0.586, <i>p</i> = 0.001), as well as lower total executive function scores (beta = -0.429, <i>p</i> = 0.000). No significant associations were found between executive function and age of onset or number of antiepileptic drugs. Our results indicate that adult epileptic patients display substantial executive dysfunction, particularly in working memory and cognitive flexibility and highlight the detrimental effect of inadequately controlled epilepsy and high seizure frequency on exacerbating these impairments. This underscores the importance of regular executive function assessments in the management of epileptic patients, tailored to individual needs and performance levels, to optimize care and improve quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2519998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Executive functions are frequently impaired in individuals with epilepsy. Understanding the patterns of these dysfunctions is essential for effective management of epileptic patients. To comprehend these patterns, we aimed to investigate executive function performance in adult epileptic patients. Thirty adults with epilepsy, along with fifty healthy controls matched for age, gender, and education were administered standard performance-based executive tasks, including Digit Span Forward and Backward, Trail Making Test A and B, Design Fluency Regular and Irregular, and Semantic Verbal Fluency. Results indicated that Digit Span Forward and Backward tests were the most frequently impaired, with 80% and 90% of patients showing impairments, respectively. The Semantic Verbal Fluency task had the lowest frequency of impairment, with a 30% prevalence among patients. Additionally, a higher frequency of seizures significantly predicted longer completion times for Trail Making Test A (beta = 0.281, p = 0.030) and Trail Making Test B (beta = 0.586, p = 0.001), as well as lower total executive function scores (beta = -0.429, p = 0.000). No significant associations were found between executive function and age of onset or number of antiepileptic drugs. Our results indicate that adult epileptic patients display substantial executive dysfunction, particularly in working memory and cognitive flexibility and highlight the detrimental effect of inadequately controlled epilepsy and high seizure frequency on exacerbating these impairments. This underscores the importance of regular executive function assessments in the management of epileptic patients, tailored to individual needs and performance levels, to optimize care and improve quality of life.

癫痫的认知负担:评估成人患者的执行功能障碍。
癫痫患者的执行功能经常受损。了解这些功能障碍的模式对癫痫患者的有效管理至关重要。为了理解这些模式,我们旨在研究成人癫痫患者的执行功能表现。30名成年癫痫患者,以及50名年龄、性别和教育程度相匹配的健康对照者,接受了标准的基于表现的执行任务,包括数字跨距向前和向后、轨迹制作测试A和B、设计流畅性规则和不规则,以及语义语言流畅性。结果表明,数字跨距向前和向后测试是最常见的障碍,分别有80%和90%的患者表现出障碍。语义语言流畅性任务出现障碍的频率最低,在患者中患病率为30%。此外,较高的癫痫发作频率显著预示着更长的完成时间的线索制作测试a (beta = 0.281, p = 0.030)和线索制作测试B (beta = 0.586, p = 0.001),以及较低的总执行功能得分(beta = -0.429, p = 0.000)。没有发现执行功能与发病年龄或抗癫痫药物的数量有显著关联。我们的研究结果表明,成年癫痫患者表现出严重的执行功能障碍,特别是在工作记忆和认知灵活性方面,并强调癫痫控制不充分和高发作频率对加剧这些障碍的有害影响。这强调了在癫痫患者管理中根据个人需求和表现水平进行定期执行功能评估的重要性,以优化护理和提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信