Investigating the neural and behavioral correlates of the stress-rumination link in healthy humans by modulating the left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex using Theta Burst Stimulation.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Isabell Int-Veen, Ute Eßer, Sandra Ladegast, Leonhard Liermann, Ramona Täglich, Betti Schopp, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Christian Plewnia, Agnes Kroczek, Stefanie De Smet, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Andreas J Fallgatter, Ann-Christine Ehlis, Beatrix Barth, David Rosenbaum
{"title":"Investigating the neural and behavioral correlates of the stress-rumination link in healthy humans by modulating the left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex using Theta Burst Stimulation.","authors":"Isabell Int-Veen, Ute Eßer, Sandra Ladegast, Leonhard Liermann, Ramona Täglich, Betti Schopp, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Christian Plewnia, Agnes Kroczek, Stefanie De Smet, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt, Andreas J Fallgatter, Ann-Christine Ehlis, Beatrix Barth, David Rosenbaum","doi":"10.3758/s13415-025-01305-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) offers a noninvasive way to modulate neural activation patterns, helping to explore the causal role of brain regions in psychiatric symptoms. Prefrontal hypoactivation is commonly observed in high ruminators and patients with depression during stress. However, the impact of modulating Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) activity via excitatory and inhibitory TBS during stress remains unexplored. We studied 88 healthy participants (44 low, 44 high ruminators), each attending two appointments that included stress induction using the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and cortical oxygenation assessment with functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). Participants received either intermittent TBS (iTBS) or continuous TBS (cTBS) applied to the left DLPFC, with sessions randomized between active and sham stimulation. While TBS had no impact on positive affect, TSST performance, or heart rate, we observed effects on stress, state rumination, negative affect, and cortical oxygenation. We observed higher stress and higher negative affect during and after the TSST in high ruminators receiving iTBS compared with sham TBS (sTBS). Low ruminators showed reduced state rumination increases after iTBS compared with sTBS at their second appointment. fNIRS data revealed cortical oxygenation differences during the TSST, although only without multiple comparison corrections. Descriptively, we observed higher activation in the left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC) following cTBS compared with sTBS in high ruminators but lower cortical oxygenation following cTBS compared with sTBS in low ruminators but only when participants received active stimulation first. This suggests stimulation sequence affects repeated-measures TMS studies in stress contexts. Findings highlight expectancy effects and suggest a potential reduction in TBS impact due to strong hemodynamic responses during stress. HIGHLIGHTS: • High ruminators showed increased stress and negative affect after iTBS during the TSST. • Neural data showed increased cortical oxygenation in the left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC) following cTBS to the left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) in high ruminators. • In low ruminators, cTBS led to decreased activation, but only when active stimulation was administered first, highlighting the role of stimulation order in TBS outcomes. • Expectancy effects and habituation are important aspects to be considered in repeated measures designs involving TBS and stress-reactive rumination.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01305-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) offers a noninvasive way to modulate neural activation patterns, helping to explore the causal role of brain regions in psychiatric symptoms. Prefrontal hypoactivation is commonly observed in high ruminators and patients with depression during stress. However, the impact of modulating Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) activity via excitatory and inhibitory TBS during stress remains unexplored. We studied 88 healthy participants (44 low, 44 high ruminators), each attending two appointments that included stress induction using the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) and cortical oxygenation assessment with functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). Participants received either intermittent TBS (iTBS) or continuous TBS (cTBS) applied to the left DLPFC, with sessions randomized between active and sham stimulation. While TBS had no impact on positive affect, TSST performance, or heart rate, we observed effects on stress, state rumination, negative affect, and cortical oxygenation. We observed higher stress and higher negative affect during and after the TSST in high ruminators receiving iTBS compared with sham TBS (sTBS). Low ruminators showed reduced state rumination increases after iTBS compared with sTBS at their second appointment. fNIRS data revealed cortical oxygenation differences during the TSST, although only without multiple comparison corrections. Descriptively, we observed higher activation in the left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC) following cTBS compared with sTBS in high ruminators but lower cortical oxygenation following cTBS compared with sTBS in low ruminators but only when participants received active stimulation first. This suggests stimulation sequence affects repeated-measures TMS studies in stress contexts. Findings highlight expectancy effects and suggest a potential reduction in TBS impact due to strong hemodynamic responses during stress. HIGHLIGHTS: • High ruminators showed increased stress and negative affect after iTBS during the TSST. • Neural data showed increased cortical oxygenation in the left Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex (VLPFC) following cTBS to the left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) in high ruminators. • In low ruminators, cTBS led to decreased activation, but only when active stimulation was administered first, highlighting the role of stimulation order in TBS outcomes. • Expectancy effects and habituation are important aspects to be considered in repeated measures designs involving TBS and stress-reactive rumination.

θ波爆发刺激(TBS)提供了一种非侵入性的方式来调节神经激活模式,有助于探索大脑区域在精神症状中的因果作用。前额叶低活跃性通常见于高反刍者和压力下抑郁的患者。然而,应激期间通过兴奋性和抑制性TBS调节背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)活动的影响仍未被探索。我们研究了88名健康参与者(44名低反刍者,44名高反刍者),每个人都参加了两次约会,包括使用Trier社会压力测试(TSST)进行压力诱导和使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)进行皮质氧合评估。参与者接受间歇性TBS (iTBS)或连续TBS (cTBS),并随机分为主动刺激和假刺激。虽然TBS对积极情绪、TSST表现或心率没有影响,但我们观察到对应激、状态反刍、消极情绪和皮质氧合的影响。我们观察到高反刍者在接受iTBS时和之后的应激和负性情绪高于假TBS (sTBS)。低反刍者在第二次预约时,与sTBS相比,iTBS后状态反刍的增加有所减少。fNIRS数据显示了TSST期间皮质氧合的差异,尽管没有多次比较校正。描述性地,我们观察到高反刍者在cTBS后左腹外侧前额叶皮层(VLPFC)的激活比sTBS高,但与低反刍者sTBS相比,cTBS后皮层氧合水平较低,但只有在参与者首先接受主动刺激时才如此。这表明刺激顺序会影响应激环境下重复测量的TMS研究。研究结果强调了预期效应,并表明由于应激时强烈的血流动力学反应,TBS的影响可能会减少。•高反刍者在TSST期间iTBS后表现出增加的压力和负面影响。•神经数据显示,在高反刍者的左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)进行cTBS后,左腹外侧前额叶皮层(VLPFC)的皮质氧合增加。•在低反刍者中,cTBS导致激活降低,但仅在主动刺激首先实施时,突出了刺激顺序在TBS结果中的作用。•在涉及TBS和应激反应性反刍的重复测量设计中,期望效应和习惯化是需要考虑的重要方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信