Cognitive appraisal modulates Theta Burst Stimulation effects on stress-reactive rumination and affect.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Isabell Int-Veen, Stefanie De Smet, Matias M Pulopulos, Gert Vanhollebeke, Beatrix Barth, Sarah Pasche, Francesco Albasini, Chris Baeken, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Christian Plewnia, Vanessa Nieratschker, Andreas Jochen Fallgatter, Ann-Christine Ehlis, David Rosenbaum, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
{"title":"Cognitive appraisal modulates Theta Burst Stimulation effects on stress-reactive rumination and affect.","authors":"Isabell Int-Veen, Stefanie De Smet, Matias M Pulopulos, Gert Vanhollebeke, Beatrix Barth, Sarah Pasche, Francesco Albasini, Chris Baeken, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Christian Plewnia, Vanessa Nieratschker, Andreas Jochen Fallgatter, Ann-Christine Ehlis, David Rosenbaum, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt","doi":"10.3758/s13415-025-01314-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The DLPFC plays a central role in cognitive appraisal and stress regulation, as this process-particularly secondary appraisal, where individuals assess their ability to cope with a situation-significantly influences stress responses on both psychological and physiological levels. We conducted a study where we applied different types of Theta Burst Stimulation (intermittent (i)TBS vs. continuous (c)TBS vs. sham (s)TBS) to the left DLPFC to increase or decrease the cortical excitability of the prefrontal neural network. We then examined how participants responded psychologically and physiologically to a potent psychosocial stressor, the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), and aimed to investigate the influence of secondary cognitive appraisal on the effects of TBS on the stress response. Depending on the stimulation, we discovered that the cognitive appraisal significantly influenced rumination, positive and negative affect specifically in stress recovery. More precisely, as expected, individuals who perceived greater control experienced a faster recovery of stress-reactive ruminative thinking following sTBS and lower rumination following the stressor. We found lower increases and faster recovery of negative affect in all stimulation conditions and faster decreases in positive affect after the TSST following cTBS and iTBS, suggesting beneficial effects of both stimulation conditions. Concerning the assessed physiological variables, namely heart rate, heart rate variability, and salivary cortisol, we did not observe any impact of appraisal. These findings suggest that the effect of secondary appraisal on psychological variables depends on the type of stimulation, and while it may be linked to increased DLPFC activity, further research is needed to clarify the neurostimulation mechanisms involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01314-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The DLPFC plays a central role in cognitive appraisal and stress regulation, as this process-particularly secondary appraisal, where individuals assess their ability to cope with a situation-significantly influences stress responses on both psychological and physiological levels. We conducted a study where we applied different types of Theta Burst Stimulation (intermittent (i)TBS vs. continuous (c)TBS vs. sham (s)TBS) to the left DLPFC to increase or decrease the cortical excitability of the prefrontal neural network. We then examined how participants responded psychologically and physiologically to a potent psychosocial stressor, the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), and aimed to investigate the influence of secondary cognitive appraisal on the effects of TBS on the stress response. Depending on the stimulation, we discovered that the cognitive appraisal significantly influenced rumination, positive and negative affect specifically in stress recovery. More precisely, as expected, individuals who perceived greater control experienced a faster recovery of stress-reactive ruminative thinking following sTBS and lower rumination following the stressor. We found lower increases and faster recovery of negative affect in all stimulation conditions and faster decreases in positive affect after the TSST following cTBS and iTBS, suggesting beneficial effects of both stimulation conditions. Concerning the assessed physiological variables, namely heart rate, heart rate variability, and salivary cortisol, we did not observe any impact of appraisal. These findings suggest that the effect of secondary appraisal on psychological variables depends on the type of stimulation, and while it may be linked to increased DLPFC activity, further research is needed to clarify the neurostimulation mechanisms involved.

DLPFC在认知评估和压力调节中起着核心作用,因为这一过程——尤其是二次评估,即个体评估自己应对某种情况的能力——在心理和生理层面上显著影响压力反应。我们进行了一项研究,我们将不同类型的θ波爆发刺激(间歇性(1)TBS vs.连续(c)TBS vs.假性(5)TBS)应用于左DLPFC,以增加或减少前额叶神经网络的皮质兴奋性。然后,我们研究了参与者如何在心理和生理上对强大的社会心理压力源——特里尔社会压力测试(TSST)做出反应,并旨在探讨二次认知评价对TBS对压力反应的影响。根据不同的刺激,我们发现认知评价显著影响反刍、积极和消极情绪,特别是在压力恢复中。更准确地说,正如预期的那样,那些认为控制能力更强的人在sTBS后的压力反应性反刍思维恢复得更快,在压力源后的反刍思维恢复得更低。我们发现,在cTBS和iTBS之后,所有刺激条件下消极情绪的增加都更低,恢复更快,而积极情绪的下降更快,这表明两种刺激条件都有有益的作用。关于评估的生理变量,即心率、心率变异性和唾液皮质醇,我们没有观察到评估的任何影响。这些发现表明,二次评价对心理变量的影响取决于刺激的类型,虽然它可能与DLPFC活动的增加有关,但需要进一步的研究来阐明所涉及的神经刺激机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信