Centering a Justice-Based Approach to Disability Inclusion in Medical Education.

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-23 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000006146
Mytien Nguyen, Justin L Bullock, Shruthi Venkataraman, Dowin Boatright
{"title":"Centering a Justice-Based Approach to Disability Inclusion in Medical Education.","authors":"Mytien Nguyen, Justin L Bullock, Shruthi Venkataraman, Dowin Boatright","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Despite institutional efforts to promote diversity and inclusion, medical education continues to marginalize students with disabilities through persistent structural, cultural, and procedural barriers. Inaccessible learning environments, inadequate accommodations, and entrenched ableist attitudes contribute to inequitable educational experiences and outcomes for disabled students. These barriers are further compounded for individuals who hold intersecting marginalized identities, particularly those who are racially and ethnically underrepresented in medicine. This commentary applies the disability justice framework-a praxis developed by disabled queer and trans activists of color-to critically examine the limitations of current inclusion efforts within academic medicine. By analyzing the framework's 10 guiding principles, the authors identify systemic gaps and propose concrete, equity-driven strategies for transforming medical education. Recommendations include integrating intersectionality into curricula, adopting universal design, revising technical standards, elevating the leadership of disabled individuals, and embedding structural accountability. Operationalizing disability justice enables medical institutions to move beyond performative inclusion, dismantle ableist norms, and foster educational environments in which all trainees-particularly those at the margins-can thrive.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"S119-S123"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Despite institutional efforts to promote diversity and inclusion, medical education continues to marginalize students with disabilities through persistent structural, cultural, and procedural barriers. Inaccessible learning environments, inadequate accommodations, and entrenched ableist attitudes contribute to inequitable educational experiences and outcomes for disabled students. These barriers are further compounded for individuals who hold intersecting marginalized identities, particularly those who are racially and ethnically underrepresented in medicine. This commentary applies the disability justice framework-a praxis developed by disabled queer and trans activists of color-to critically examine the limitations of current inclusion efforts within academic medicine. By analyzing the framework's 10 guiding principles, the authors identify systemic gaps and propose concrete, equity-driven strategies for transforming medical education. Recommendations include integrating intersectionality into curricula, adopting universal design, revising technical standards, elevating the leadership of disabled individuals, and embedding structural accountability. Operationalizing disability justice enables medical institutions to move beyond performative inclusion, dismantle ableist norms, and foster educational environments in which all trainees-particularly those at the margins-can thrive.

以公正为中心的医学教育残障包容。
摘要:尽管机构努力促进多样性和包容性,但由于持续存在的结构、文化和程序障碍,医学教育继续将残疾学生边缘化。难以接近的学习环境、不充分的住宿和根深蒂固的残疾主义态度导致残疾学生的教育经历和结果不公平。对于具有交叉边缘身份的个人,特别是那些在医学中种族和民族代表性不足的人来说,这些障碍进一步加剧。这篇评论运用残疾正义框架——由有色人种残疾酷儿和跨性别活动家开发的实践——来批判性地审视当前学术医学中包容努力的局限性。通过分析该框架的10项指导原则,作者确定了系统性差距,并提出了具体的、公平驱动的医学教育转型战略。建议包括将交叉性纳入课程,采用通用设计,修订技术标准,提升残疾人的领导能力,以及嵌入结构性问责制。实施残疾公正使医疗机构能够超越行为包容,消除残疾主义规范,并营造所有受训人员(特别是边缘人员)都能茁壮成长的教育环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信