Validation of "Victorian institute of sports assessment for patellar tendons" in patellofemoral pain: Reliability, interpretability and feasibility study.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Gema Chamorro-Moriana, Fernando Espuny-Ruiz, Carmen Ridao-Fernandez, Eleonora Magni
{"title":"Validation of \"Victorian institute of sports assessment for patellar tendons\" in patellofemoral pain: Reliability, interpretability and feasibility study.","authors":"Gema Chamorro-Moriana, Fernando Espuny-Ruiz, Carmen Ridao-Fernandez, Eleonora Magni","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.105068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Victorian institute of sports assessment for patellar tendons questionnaire (VISA-P), a valid tool for patellar tendinopathy, has been used for patellofemoral pain (PFP).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To validate VISA-P in PFP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study of validity, responsiveness and feasibility following COSMIN. Inclusion criteria: Subjects with PFP, aged 18 to 55. Agreement among 10 experts on the relevance and clarity of each item using Aiken's V coefficient determined content validity. An exploratory factorial analysis established structural validity. The correlation of VISA-P with knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for PFP and Osteoarthritis (KOOS-PF) and Kujala patellofemoral score (KPS; specific for PFP) analyzed the construct validity. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's <i>α</i> and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Feasibility considered the subjects' self-completion time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 103 knees from 73 subjects (47 female/26 male; aged 34.9 ± 13 SD). The items were relevant and clear, with the exception of item-8, which didn't reach an acceptable level of agreement on clarity. Exploratory factorial analysis found a 2-factor solution, which explained 63.48% of the variance. VISA-P achieved a strong and significant correlation with KOOS-PF (Spearman rho = 0.826; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and KPS (Spearman rho = 0.771; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The questionnaire showed adequate reliability (Cronbach's <i>α</i>: 0.752; ICC: 0.934; <i>P</i> < 0.0001; 95%CI: 0.902-0.955). The mean self-completion time was 232 ± 0.52 SD seconds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VISA-P proved to be valid and reliable to functionally assess PFP and/or chondromalacia patella. VISA-P is a feasible tool in the clinical and research environment, quick and easy to complete.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"16 6","pages":"105068"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.105068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Victorian institute of sports assessment for patellar tendons questionnaire (VISA-P), a valid tool for patellar tendinopathy, has been used for patellofemoral pain (PFP).

Aim: To validate VISA-P in PFP.

Methods: Study of validity, responsiveness and feasibility following COSMIN. Inclusion criteria: Subjects with PFP, aged 18 to 55. Agreement among 10 experts on the relevance and clarity of each item using Aiken's V coefficient determined content validity. An exploratory factorial analysis established structural validity. The correlation of VISA-P with knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for PFP and Osteoarthritis (KOOS-PF) and Kujala patellofemoral score (KPS; specific for PFP) analyzed the construct validity. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Feasibility considered the subjects' self-completion time.

Results: The sample consisted of 103 knees from 73 subjects (47 female/26 male; aged 34.9 ± 13 SD). The items were relevant and clear, with the exception of item-8, which didn't reach an acceptable level of agreement on clarity. Exploratory factorial analysis found a 2-factor solution, which explained 63.48% of the variance. VISA-P achieved a strong and significant correlation with KOOS-PF (Spearman rho = 0.826; P < 0.001) and KPS (Spearman rho = 0.771; P < 0.001). The questionnaire showed adequate reliability (Cronbach's α: 0.752; ICC: 0.934; P < 0.0001; 95%CI: 0.902-0.955). The mean self-completion time was 232 ± 0.52 SD seconds.

Conclusion: VISA-P proved to be valid and reliable to functionally assess PFP and/or chondromalacia patella. VISA-P is a feasible tool in the clinical and research environment, quick and easy to complete.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

“维多利亚运动评估机构髌骨肌腱”在髌股疼痛中的有效性:可靠性、可解释性和可行性研究。
背景:维多利亚运动评估研究所髌骨肌腱问卷(VISA-P)是髌腱病的有效工具,已被用于髌股痛(PFP)。目的:验证VISA-P在PFP中的应用。方法:研究COSMIN的效度、反应性和可行性。纳入标准:PFP患者,年龄18 - 55岁。使用艾肯V系数确定内容效度的是10位专家对每个项目的相关性和清晰度的一致意见。探索性因子分析建立了结构效度。VISA-P与膝关节损伤和骨关节炎预后评分(PFP和骨关节炎评分,KOOS-PF)和Kujala髌骨股骨评分(KPS;(针对PFP)分析构念效度。内部一致性采用Cronbach’s α计算,重测信度采用类内相关系数(ICC)计算。可行性考虑受试者的自我完成时间。结果:样本包括73名受试者的103个膝盖(47名女性/26名男性;年龄34.9±13 SD)。这些项目都是相关和明确的,但项目8除外,它没有在明确程度上达成可接受的协议。探索性因子分析发现了一个双因子解决方案,解释了63.48%的方差。VISA-P与KOOS-PF呈显著强相关(Spearman ρ = 0.826;P < 0.001)和KPS (Spearman rho = 0.771;P < 0.001)。问卷具有足够的信度(Cronbach’s α: 0.752;国际刑事法庭:0.934;P < 0.0001;95%置信区间:0.902—-0.955)。平均自完成时间为232±0.52 SD秒。结论:VISA-P对PFP和/或髌骨软骨软化症的功能评估是有效和可靠的。VISA-P是临床和研究环境中可行的工具,快速,易于完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信