Rotator cuff and capsule healing after shoulder arthroscopy: A second look arthroscopic study.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Christos Yiannakopoulos, Christos Koukos, Apostolos Habipis, Constantinos Apostolou
{"title":"Rotator cuff and capsule healing after shoulder arthroscopy: A second look arthroscopic study.","authors":"Christos Yiannakopoulos, Christos Koukos, Apostolos Habipis, Constantinos Apostolou","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.106458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shoulder arthroscopy is commonly used for the repair of glenohumeral ligament avulsions or tendon tears. The success of the operation depends on the ability of the ligaments or rotator cuff tendon to heal to their original attachment site. Soft tissue healing can be evaluated with imaging methods or alternatively with second-look arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate shoulder tendon and capsule healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff and instability repair using second-look arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 24 adult patients with rotator cuff tears (13 patients) or anterior shoulder instability (11 patients) were included. All patients were initially subjected to arthroscopic repair using suture anchors and were re-evaluated with second-look arthroscopy for reasons not related to the original pathology. The second operation was performed in 8 patients due to mild but persistent pain or stiffness, in 3 patients for recalcitrant stiffness, in 5 patients for secondary biceps tenotomy, in 6 patients for persistent acromioclavicular joint pain and in 2 patients for suture anchor prominence causing shoulder grinding. Soft tissue healing was evaluated visually and by probing, whereas clinical outcomes were evaluated using the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) and Rowe rating scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In almost all patients, complete soft tissue healing occurred at the site of tissue reattachment, either on the glenoid articular surface or the greater humeral tuberosity. The strongest repair, as confirmed by probe palpation, was encountered at the site of suture passage through the soft tissue. All suture material was covered with bursal synovial tissue, with no cases of knot impingement or cartilage fraying. The mean preoperative and postoperative UCLA scores for rotator cuff repair patients were 1354 ± 3205 and 2931 ± 2898, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001), whereas for shoulder instability patients, the mean Rowe scores preoperatively and postoperatively were 2591 ± 1338 and 9272 ± 754, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The use of bioabsorbable implants did not cause synovitis or other tissue reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Soft tissue healing in the shoulder is successful and strongest at the site of suture anchor placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"16 6","pages":"106458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.106458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shoulder arthroscopy is commonly used for the repair of glenohumeral ligament avulsions or tendon tears. The success of the operation depends on the ability of the ligaments or rotator cuff tendon to heal to their original attachment site. Soft tissue healing can be evaluated with imaging methods or alternatively with second-look arthroscopy.

Aim: To investigate shoulder tendon and capsule healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff and instability repair using second-look arthroscopy.

Methods: In this study, 24 adult patients with rotator cuff tears (13 patients) or anterior shoulder instability (11 patients) were included. All patients were initially subjected to arthroscopic repair using suture anchors and were re-evaluated with second-look arthroscopy for reasons not related to the original pathology. The second operation was performed in 8 patients due to mild but persistent pain or stiffness, in 3 patients for recalcitrant stiffness, in 5 patients for secondary biceps tenotomy, in 6 patients for persistent acromioclavicular joint pain and in 2 patients for suture anchor prominence causing shoulder grinding. Soft tissue healing was evaluated visually and by probing, whereas clinical outcomes were evaluated using the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) and Rowe rating scales.

Results: In almost all patients, complete soft tissue healing occurred at the site of tissue reattachment, either on the glenoid articular surface or the greater humeral tuberosity. The strongest repair, as confirmed by probe palpation, was encountered at the site of suture passage through the soft tissue. All suture material was covered with bursal synovial tissue, with no cases of knot impingement or cartilage fraying. The mean preoperative and postoperative UCLA scores for rotator cuff repair patients were 1354 ± 3205 and 2931 ± 2898, respectively (P < 0.001), whereas for shoulder instability patients, the mean Rowe scores preoperatively and postoperatively were 2591 ± 1338 and 9272 ± 754, respectively (P < 0.001). The use of bioabsorbable implants did not cause synovitis or other tissue reactions.

Conclusion: Soft tissue healing in the shoulder is successful and strongest at the site of suture anchor placement.

肩关节镜后肩袖和肩关节囊的愈合:关节镜研究的第二次观察。
背景:肩关节镜常用于肱骨盂韧带撕脱或肌腱撕裂的修复。手术的成功与否取决于韧带或肩袖肌腱恢复到原来附着部位的能力。软组织愈合可通过影像学方法或二次关节镜评估。目的:探讨关节镜下肩袖术后肩肌腱和肩关节囊的愈合及二次关节镜下不稳定性的修复。方法:本研究纳入24例肩袖撕裂(13例)或前肩不稳(11例)的成人患者。所有患者最初使用缝合锚进行关节镜修复,并因与原始病理无关的原因进行二次关节镜重新评估。因轻度但持续疼痛或僵硬8例,顽固性僵硬3例,继发性肱二头肌肌腱切开术5例,持续性肩锁关节疼痛6例,缝合锚钉突出引起磨肩2例。软组织愈合通过视觉和探针进行评估,而临床结果使用加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)和Rowe评分量表进行评估。结果:在几乎所有患者中,软组织完全愈合发生在组织再附着的部位,无论是在肩关节面还是肱骨大结节。探针触诊证实,最强的修复是在缝合穿过软组织的部位。所有缝合材料均覆盖有滑囊组织,无结节撞击或软骨磨损。肩袖修复患者的术前和术后平均UCLA评分分别为1354±3205分和2931±2898分(P < 0.001),而肩关节不稳患者的术前和术后平均Rowe评分分别为2591±1338分和9272±754分(P < 0.001)。使用生物可吸收的植入物不会引起滑膜炎或其他组织反应。结论:肩关节软组织愈合成功,且在缝合锚钉放置部位愈合最强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信