Pure high-offset stems can cause an unexpected increase in femoral length in robotic-assisted primary total hip arthroplasty.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Wei-Shao Tung, Aidin Eslam Pour, Johannes Sieberer, Claire A Donnelley, Steven M Tommasini, Daniel H Wiznia
{"title":"Pure high-offset stems can cause an unexpected increase in femoral length in robotic-assisted primary total hip arthroplasty.","authors":"Wei-Shao Tung, Aidin Eslam Pour, Johannes Sieberer, Claire A Donnelley, Steven M Tommasini, Daniel H Wiznia","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.107292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Certain implant combinations change leg length and offset in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Poor restoration of leg biomechanics is a frequently cited reason for patient dissatisfaction following primary THA. A pure high-offset stem should provide direct lateralization without affecting femoral length when compared to a standard stem. However, clinical experience with preoperative planning software based on computed tomography-based three-dimensional-models reveals that using pure high-offset stems in THA may cause a difference between expected (no change in femoral length) and actual (small increase) in postoperative femoral length.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To elucidate the causes of these femoral length discrepancies using preoperative planning software.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preoperative templating for 43 robotic-assisted THAs, optimizing acetabular size and orientation, center of rotation, stem size and offset, and prosthetic head diameter were obtained. The preoperative planning software was used to calculate differences between preoperative and postoperative femoral length for standard and pure high-offset stems, unique to each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Whilst the increase in femoral length between standard and high-offset stems was not significant (<i>P</i> = 0.93), 35 femurs (81.4%) experienced a 1-mm increase, and 3 (7.0%) experienced a 2-mm increase in femoral length while using high-offset stem compared to the standard stem. The incidence of femoral length increase was lower for patients with shorter femurs (18/22; 81.8%) compared to patients with longer femurs (20/21; 95.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When pure high-offset stems were used in preoperative planning software, we demonstrated an unexpected increase in leg length between 1-2-mm in 88.4% of patients. This unexpected increase in femoral length is due to a function of the preoperative planning software's planned stem alignment with the anatomical axis, and not an inherent fault in the stem design. With expanding accessibility of robotic-assisted THA platforms, all potential sources of postoperative leg length discrepancy should be identified during preoperative templating and necessary alterations to the surgical plan should be made to accommodate this unexpected difference when using a pure high-offset stem.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"16 6","pages":"107292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.107292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Certain implant combinations change leg length and offset in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Poor restoration of leg biomechanics is a frequently cited reason for patient dissatisfaction following primary THA. A pure high-offset stem should provide direct lateralization without affecting femoral length when compared to a standard stem. However, clinical experience with preoperative planning software based on computed tomography-based three-dimensional-models reveals that using pure high-offset stems in THA may cause a difference between expected (no change in femoral length) and actual (small increase) in postoperative femoral length.

Aim: To elucidate the causes of these femoral length discrepancies using preoperative planning software.

Methods: Preoperative templating for 43 robotic-assisted THAs, optimizing acetabular size and orientation, center of rotation, stem size and offset, and prosthetic head diameter were obtained. The preoperative planning software was used to calculate differences between preoperative and postoperative femoral length for standard and pure high-offset stems, unique to each patient.

Results: Whilst the increase in femoral length between standard and high-offset stems was not significant (P = 0.93), 35 femurs (81.4%) experienced a 1-mm increase, and 3 (7.0%) experienced a 2-mm increase in femoral length while using high-offset stem compared to the standard stem. The incidence of femoral length increase was lower for patients with shorter femurs (18/22; 81.8%) compared to patients with longer femurs (20/21; 95.2%).

Conclusion: When pure high-offset stems were used in preoperative planning software, we demonstrated an unexpected increase in leg length between 1-2-mm in 88.4% of patients. This unexpected increase in femoral length is due to a function of the preoperative planning software's planned stem alignment with the anatomical axis, and not an inherent fault in the stem design. With expanding accessibility of robotic-assisted THA platforms, all potential sources of postoperative leg length discrepancy should be identified during preoperative templating and necessary alterations to the surgical plan should be made to accommodate this unexpected difference when using a pure high-offset stem.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在机器人辅助的初次全髋关节置换术中,单纯的高偏移柄会导致股骨长度意外增加。
背景:在初次全髋关节置换术(THA)中,某些植入物组合会改变腿长和偏移量。下肢生物力学恢复不佳是原发性THA术后患者不满意的常见原因。与标准柄相比,纯高偏置柄应提供直接侧移而不影响股骨长度。然而,基于计算机断层扫描三维模型的术前规划软件的临床经验表明,在THA中使用纯高偏移柄可能导致预期(股骨长度无变化)与实际(术后股骨长度小幅增加)之间的差异。目的:利用术前规划软件分析股骨长度差异的原因。方法:对43例机器人辅助tha进行术前模板,优化髋臼大小、定位、旋转中心、假体柄大小、偏移量和假体头直径。术前计划软件用于计算每位患者独有的标准和纯高偏移柄的术前和术后股骨长度差异。结果:虽然标准和高偏移柄之间股骨长度的增加并不显著(P = 0.93),但与标准柄相比,使用高偏移柄时,35根股骨(81.4%)的股骨长度增加了1毫米,3根(7.0%)的股骨长度增加了2毫米。股骨较短的患者股骨长度增加的发生率较低(18/22;81.8%)与股骨较长的患者相比(20/21;95.2%)。结论:当在术前计划软件中使用纯高偏移柄时,我们发现88.4%的患者腿长在1- 2mm之间意外增加。股骨长度的意外增加是由于术前规划软件计划的柄与解剖轴对齐的功能,而不是柄设计的固有缺陷。随着机器人辅助THA平台的可及性的扩大,在术前模板时应确定术后腿长差异的所有潜在来源,并在使用纯高偏移杆时对手术计划进行必要的修改以适应这种意想不到的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信