{"title":"Clinical comparison of arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair with or without long head of biceps tendon transposition.","authors":"Yu-Jun Zhou, Bei-Bei Wang, Hua-Wei Wen, Liang Xu, Jing Feng, Fu-Sheng Xu","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.103875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) transposition is a novel technique based on the double-row suture bridge method, utilizing autologous reconstruction to treat massive rotator cuff tears.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the mid-to-long-term clinical outcomes following the double-row repair method for massive rotator cuff tears.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included data from 53 patients with massive rotator cuff tears treated at our hospital between 2020 and 2021. The patients were divided into the double-row repair group (conventional group) and the double-row repair combined with the LHBT transposition group (transposition group). Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale at one week, one year, and the final follow-up. Shoulder function was evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant-Murley scores at one year and the final follow-up. Rotator cuff healing was assessed postoperatively for one year using the Sugaya classification, which categorizes tendon integrity based on magnetic resonance imaging findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No perioperative complications were observed in any of the patients at any time. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding operative time and intraoperative blood loss. The transposition group had significantly lower visual analogue scale scores than the conventional group at one week postoperatively; however, there were no significant differences between the groups at one year or the final follow-up. At one year postoperatively, the transposition group showed significantly higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant-Murley scores than the conventional group; no significant differences were observed at the final follow-up. There were no significant differences in rotator cuff healing between the groups at one year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to double-row repair alone, double-row repair combined with LHBT transposition for treating massive rotator cuff tears more effectively alleviates short-term postoperative pain and improves shoulder function within the first year.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"16 6","pages":"103875"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.103875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) transposition is a novel technique based on the double-row suture bridge method, utilizing autologous reconstruction to treat massive rotator cuff tears.
Aim: To evaluate the mid-to-long-term clinical outcomes following the double-row repair method for massive rotator cuff tears.
Methods: This retrospective analysis included data from 53 patients with massive rotator cuff tears treated at our hospital between 2020 and 2021. The patients were divided into the double-row repair group (conventional group) and the double-row repair combined with the LHBT transposition group (transposition group). Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale at one week, one year, and the final follow-up. Shoulder function was evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant-Murley scores at one year and the final follow-up. Rotator cuff healing was assessed postoperatively for one year using the Sugaya classification, which categorizes tendon integrity based on magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Results: No perioperative complications were observed in any of the patients at any time. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding operative time and intraoperative blood loss. The transposition group had significantly lower visual analogue scale scores than the conventional group at one week postoperatively; however, there were no significant differences between the groups at one year or the final follow-up. At one year postoperatively, the transposition group showed significantly higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant-Murley scores than the conventional group; no significant differences were observed at the final follow-up. There were no significant differences in rotator cuff healing between the groups at one year postoperatively.
Conclusion: Compared to double-row repair alone, double-row repair combined with LHBT transposition for treating massive rotator cuff tears more effectively alleviates short-term postoperative pain and improves shoulder function within the first year.
背景:肱二头长头肌腱(LHBT)移位是一种基于双排缝合桥法的新技术,利用自体重建治疗大量肩袖撕裂。目的:评价双排修复大面积肩袖撕裂的中长期临床效果。方法:本回顾性分析纳入了2020年至2021年在我院治疗的53例大规模肩袖撕裂患者的数据。患者分为双排修复组(常规组)和双排修复联合LHBT转位组(转位组)。术后疼痛在1周、1年和最后随访时采用视觉模拟量表进行评估。使用美国肩关节外科医生和Constant-Murley评分在一年和最后的随访中评估肩关节功能。术后一年使用Sugaya分类评估肩袖愈合情况,该分类根据磁共振成像结果对肌腱完整性进行分类。结果:所有患者均无围手术期并发症发生。两组手术时间及术中出血量差异无统计学意义。转位组术后1周视觉模拟评分明显低于常规组;然而,在一年或最后的随访中,两组之间没有显著差异。术后1年,转位组的American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons评分和Constant-Murley评分明显高于常规组;在最后的随访中没有观察到显著的差异。术后1年,两组间肩袖愈合无显著差异。结论:与单用双排修复术相比,双排修复术联合LHBT转位治疗大面积肩袖撕裂能更有效地缓解术后短期疼痛,并在一年内改善肩功能。