Short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched or baseline-balanced retrospective studies.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yang Yu, Suguru Yamauchi, Peining Zhang, Tetsu Fukunaga
{"title":"Short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched or baseline-balanced retrospective studies.","authors":"Yang Yu, Suguru Yamauchi, Peining Zhang, Tetsu Fukunaga","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02415-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal minimally invasive surgical approach for proximal gastric cancer (PGC) remains controversial. This systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis incorporated propensity score-matched (PSM) and retrospective studies with balanced baseline characteristics (BB) studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate perioperative outcomes of robotic gastrectomy (RG) compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in patients with PGC. A comprehensive literature search was carried out in alignment with PRISMA standards to identify eligible studies. Short-term outcomes were categorized into four domains: surgical performance, resection quality, postoperative complications, and recovery outcomes. Mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs), along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated as effect size estimates. Assessment of study quality involved evaluating the risk of bias and assessing potential publication bias, while heterogeneity and its potential sources were examined through sensitivity and subgroup analyses. This study included five PSM studies and three BB studies, with a total of 1163 PGC patients. Although RG was associated with a longer operative time compared to LG, it demonstrated advantages including reduced intraoperative blood loss, a greater number of dissected lymph nodes, shorter hospital stay, and earlier onset of flatus and oral intake. No statistically significant differences were observed in proximal margin, distal margin, non-R0 resection rate, overall complications, major complications, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, or reflux esophagitis. RG may provide improved short-term outcomes over LG for PGC. However, further high-quality evidence is necessary to validate these findings and thoroughly assess long-term outcomes.PROSPERO Registration: CRD420251019756.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02415-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal minimally invasive surgical approach for proximal gastric cancer (PGC) remains controversial. This systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis incorporated propensity score-matched (PSM) and retrospective studies with balanced baseline characteristics (BB) studies. The objective of this study was to evaluate perioperative outcomes of robotic gastrectomy (RG) compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) in patients with PGC. A comprehensive literature search was carried out in alignment with PRISMA standards to identify eligible studies. Short-term outcomes were categorized into four domains: surgical performance, resection quality, postoperative complications, and recovery outcomes. Mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs), along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated as effect size estimates. Assessment of study quality involved evaluating the risk of bias and assessing potential publication bias, while heterogeneity and its potential sources were examined through sensitivity and subgroup analyses. This study included five PSM studies and three BB studies, with a total of 1163 PGC patients. Although RG was associated with a longer operative time compared to LG, it demonstrated advantages including reduced intraoperative blood loss, a greater number of dissected lymph nodes, shorter hospital stay, and earlier onset of flatus and oral intake. No statistically significant differences were observed in proximal margin, distal margin, non-R0 resection rate, overall complications, major complications, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, or reflux esophagitis. RG may provide improved short-term outcomes over LG for PGC. However, further high-quality evidence is necessary to validate these findings and thoroughly assess long-term outcomes.PROSPERO Registration: CRD420251019756.

机器人与腹腔镜胃切除术治疗近端胃癌的短期疗效:倾向评分匹配或基线平衡回顾性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
近端胃癌(PGC)的最佳微创手术入路仍有争议。该系统综述和两两荟萃分析纳入了倾向评分匹配(PSM)和回顾性研究以及平衡基线特征(BB)研究。本研究的目的是评估机器人胃切除术(RG)与腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)在PGC患者中的围手术期效果。根据PRISMA标准进行了全面的文献检索,以确定符合条件的研究。短期结果分为四个方面:手术表现、切除质量、术后并发症和恢复结果。计算平均差异(MDs)和优势比(ORs)及其相应的95%置信区间(ci)作为效应大小估计值。研究质量的评估包括评估偏倚风险和评估潜在的发表偏倚,而异质性及其潜在来源则通过敏感性和亚组分析进行检查。本研究包括5项PSM研究和3项BB研究,共纳入1163例PGC患者。虽然与LG相比,RG的手术时间更长,但它显示出的优势包括术中出血量减少、清扫淋巴结数量增加、住院时间缩短、肠胃胀气和口服摄入更早。在近端缘、远端缘、非r0切除率、总并发症、主要并发症、吻合口漏、吻合口狭窄、反流性食管炎等方面,两组比较差异无统计学意义。与LG相比,RG可能为PGC提供更好的短期疗效。然而,需要进一步的高质量证据来验证这些发现并彻底评估长期结果。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD420251019756。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信