Development and validation of a tool to assess core competencies of public health professionals in low-income settings: findings from Uttar Pradesh, India.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sudip Bhandari, Sara Bennett, David H Peters
{"title":"Development and validation of a tool to assess core competencies of public health professionals in low-income settings: findings from Uttar Pradesh, India.","authors":"Sudip Bhandari, Sara Bennett, David H Peters","doi":"10.1186/s12960-025-00994-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) lack instruments to measure gaps in the public health competency of health professionals. The objective of this study is to develop a validated and reliable Core Public Health Competency (COPHEC) index by assessing the knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes of senior and mid-level public health professionals with supervisory and management responsibilities in Uttar Pradesh (UP), India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Core Competency framework that was developed in UP, we generated a draft COPHEC tool with 37 items, measured on a four-point Likert scale. We administered the tool to a total of 166 public health professionals that included two samples-84 senior and 82 mid-level public health professionals. To extract factors and assign factor scores to the instrument, we performed an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using principal component analysis (PCA). Content and face validities were assessed by examining the steps used for the construction of the draft tool. Construct validity was measured by assessing the average factor loading of the items onto the component extracted from EFA. Internal consistency was used as a measure of reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final COPHEC index had 37 items loaded on one factor in the sample. Content and face validities were assured through a participatory process with relevant stakeholders who identified the initial set of items as part of a Core Competency framework. Construct validity of the COPHEC scale was confirmed by the high average factor loading of components ranging from 0.58 to 0.81. The final index showed adequate reliability with Cronbach's alpha (α) = 0.97.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COPHEC index is a valid and reliable measure of core competencies in public health in UP. We recommend that governments adapt the index in LMICs to conduct assessments of health workers to identify training needs, evaluate the effectiveness of training programs through participants' competency acquisition pre- and post-training, and inform workforce development efforts in recruitment and performance management.</p>","PeriodicalId":39823,"journal":{"name":"Human Resources for Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resources for Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-025-00994-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) lack instruments to measure gaps in the public health competency of health professionals. The objective of this study is to develop a validated and reliable Core Public Health Competency (COPHEC) index by assessing the knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes of senior and mid-level public health professionals with supervisory and management responsibilities in Uttar Pradesh (UP), India.

Methods: Using the Core Competency framework that was developed in UP, we generated a draft COPHEC tool with 37 items, measured on a four-point Likert scale. We administered the tool to a total of 166 public health professionals that included two samples-84 senior and 82 mid-level public health professionals. To extract factors and assign factor scores to the instrument, we performed an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using principal component analysis (PCA). Content and face validities were assessed by examining the steps used for the construction of the draft tool. Construct validity was measured by assessing the average factor loading of the items onto the component extracted from EFA. Internal consistency was used as a measure of reliability.

Results: The final COPHEC index had 37 items loaded on one factor in the sample. Content and face validities were assured through a participatory process with relevant stakeholders who identified the initial set of items as part of a Core Competency framework. Construct validity of the COPHEC scale was confirmed by the high average factor loading of components ranging from 0.58 to 0.81. The final index showed adequate reliability with Cronbach's alpha (α) = 0.97.

Conclusions: The COPHEC index is a valid and reliable measure of core competencies in public health in UP. We recommend that governments adapt the index in LMICs to conduct assessments of health workers to identify training needs, evaluate the effectiveness of training programs through participants' competency acquisition pre- and post-training, and inform workforce development efforts in recruitment and performance management.

开发和验证评估低收入环境中公共卫生专业人员核心能力的工具:来自印度北方邦的调查结果。
背景:许多低收入和中等收入国家缺乏衡量卫生专业人员公共卫生能力差距的工具。本研究的目的是通过评估印度北方邦(UP)具有监督和管理职责的高级和中级公共卫生专业人员的知识、技能、能力和态度,制定一个有效和可靠的核心公共卫生能力(COPHEC)指数。方法:使用在UP中开发的核心能力框架,我们生成了一个包含37个项目的COPHEC工具草案,以四分李克特量表进行测量。我们对166名公共卫生专业人员使用了该工具,其中包括两个样本——84名高级公共卫生专业人员和82名中级公共卫生专业人员。为了提取因子并为仪器分配因子分数,我们使用主成分分析(PCA)进行了探索性因子分析(EFA)。通过检查用于构建草稿工具的步骤来评估内容效度和面效度。建构效度是通过评估项目对从EFA提取的成分的平均因子负荷来测量的。内部一致性被用来衡量信度。结果:最终的COPHEC指数在一个因子上加载了37个项目。内容效度和表面效度是通过与相关利益相关者的参与性过程来确保的,这些利益相关者将最初的一组项目确定为核心能力框架的一部分。COPHEC量表的平均因子负荷在0.58 ~ 0.81之间,具有较高的构建效度。最终指标具有足够的信度,Cronbach’s alpha (α) = 0.97。结论:COPHEC指数是北方邦公共卫生核心能力的有效和可靠的衡量标准。我们建议各国政府调整中低收入国家的指数,对卫生工作者进行评估,以确定培训需求,通过参与者在培训前和培训后的能力获取来评估培训计划的有效性,并为招聘和绩效管理方面的劳动力发展工作提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Resources for Health
Human Resources for Health Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
102
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Resources for Health is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal covering all aspects of planning, producing and managing the health workforce - all those who provide health services worldwide. Human Resources for Health aims to disseminate research on health workforce policy, the health labour market, health workforce practice, development of knowledge tools and implementation mechanisms nationally and internationally; as well as specific features of the health workforce, such as the impact of management of health workers" performance and its link with health outcomes. The journal encourages debate on health sector reforms and their link with human resources issues, a hitherto-neglected area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信