Current experience with manual push subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in patients with immune deficiencies.

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Alex Richter
{"title":"Current experience with manual push subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) in patients with immune deficiencies.","authors":"Alex Richter","doi":"10.1080/25785826.2025.2515333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunoglobulin G replacement therapy prevents infections in patients with antibody deficiencies. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) has typically been administered <i>via</i> infusion pump, but the manual push technique offers a simple, convenient alternative method. The manual push technique is efficacious, well tolerated, quick to administer, offers increased dosing flexibility, and does not rely on a pump. Having various administration options available to patients provides greater treatment satisfaction and feelings of self-empowerment, which may improve compliance. Currently available literature published before 10 February 2022, that reported patient and healthcare professional experience with SCIg administered <i>via</i> manual push, were reviewed. Literature searches were performed using PubMed, Google and ClinicalTrials.gov using key words 'manual push', 'rapid push', 'immunoglobulin', 'subcutaneous immunoglobulin', 'SCIg', and 'primary immunodeficiency'. Real-world evidence demonstrates all delivery techniques provide similar efficacy, so treatment administration becomes about patient preference, hospital resources, cost-effectiveness/recovery and clinician attitude. To establish newer administration modalities such as manual push or prefilled syringes, there needs to be patient awareness of these options, then education and finally confidence in recommending these options. Adoption of newer administration modalities will help ensure patients receive the widest range of choice, thus improving compliance and their risk of recurrent and severe infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":37286,"journal":{"name":"Immunological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25785826.2025.2515333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunoglobulin G replacement therapy prevents infections in patients with antibody deficiencies. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) has typically been administered via infusion pump, but the manual push technique offers a simple, convenient alternative method. The manual push technique is efficacious, well tolerated, quick to administer, offers increased dosing flexibility, and does not rely on a pump. Having various administration options available to patients provides greater treatment satisfaction and feelings of self-empowerment, which may improve compliance. Currently available literature published before 10 February 2022, that reported patient and healthcare professional experience with SCIg administered via manual push, were reviewed. Literature searches were performed using PubMed, Google and ClinicalTrials.gov using key words 'manual push', 'rapid push', 'immunoglobulin', 'subcutaneous immunoglobulin', 'SCIg', and 'primary immunodeficiency'. Real-world evidence demonstrates all delivery techniques provide similar efficacy, so treatment administration becomes about patient preference, hospital resources, cost-effectiveness/recovery and clinician attitude. To establish newer administration modalities such as manual push or prefilled syringes, there needs to be patient awareness of these options, then education and finally confidence in recommending these options. Adoption of newer administration modalities will help ensure patients receive the widest range of choice, thus improving compliance and their risk of recurrent and severe infection.

目前免疫缺陷患者使用手推皮下免疫球蛋白(SCIg)的经验。
免疫球蛋白G替代疗法可预防抗体缺乏患者的感染。皮下免疫球蛋白(SCIg)通常通过输液泵给药,但手动推入技术提供了一种简单、方便的替代方法。手推技术是有效的,耐受性好,快速给药,提供增加的剂量灵活性,不依赖于泵。为患者提供各种可供选择的管理方案可提供更高的治疗满意度和自我授权感,这可能会提高依从性。我们回顾了2022年2月10日之前发表的现有文献,这些文献报告了患者和医疗保健专业人员通过手推给SCIg的经验。使用PubMed、谷歌和ClinicalTrials.gov进行文献检索,关键词为“手动推送”、“快速推送”、“免疫球蛋白”、“皮下免疫球蛋白”、“SCIg”和“原发性免疫缺陷”。现实世界的证据表明,所有的给药技术都提供类似的疗效,因此治疗的实施取决于患者的偏好、医院资源、成本效益/恢复和临床医生的态度。为了建立新的给药方式,如手动推注或预充式注射器,需要让患者了解这些选择,然后是教育,最后是推荐这些选择的信心。采用新的给药方式将有助于确保患者获得最广泛的选择,从而提高依从性并降低复发和严重感染的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Immunological Medicine
Immunological Medicine Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信