Faculty Perspectives on Inpatient Clinical Experiences in a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship Curriculum: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Q4 Medicine
Alan Sazama, Carly Cooper, Hannah DeHoogh-Kliewer, Christina Lusk, Nathan Popp, Jaymi Russo
{"title":"Faculty Perspectives on Inpatient Clinical Experiences in a Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship Curriculum: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Alan Sazama, Carly Cooper, Hannah DeHoogh-Kliewer, Christina Lusk, Nathan Popp, Jaymi Russo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship (LIC) curricula have gained popularity among medical schools due to their demonstrated benefits in fostering improved relationships among patients, students, and faculty compared to traditional block schedules. The University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine (SSOM) adopted a comprehensive LIC curriculum for all campuses in 2014. SSOM encompasses four campuses distributed across the state. Faculty sufficiency has presented a persistent challenge, complicating student scheduling. Additionally, dissatisfaction among faculty regarding patient continuity has emerged as a key concern. To address this, inpatient clinical experiences were incorporated into the LIC curriculum in 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre- and post-implementation mixed-methods analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of inpatient clinical experiences on faculty satisfaction. Participants included teaching faculty who completed anonymous online surveys evaluating their satisfaction with the LIC schedule and patient continuity. The first survey was conducted in December 2022 for faculty enrolled in the 2022-23 LIC cohort prior to the implementation of inpatient clinical experiences (ICE). Subsequent surveys were conducted in 2023 and 2024 after implementation of ICE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2022, 79% of faculty expressed satisfaction with the traditional LIC schedule, yet 30% of faculty (N=92) reported dissatisfaction with patient continuity. Since the implementation of ICE weeks into the LIC, the 2024 faculty reported 73% (N=60) prefer the new hybrid model and 15% (N=12) prefer the traditional LIC. The hybrid model demonstrated a 29% (N=26) dissatisfaction rating for teaching continuity. However, 56% (N=48) of faculty reported satisfaction with student learning outcomes. Further qualitative and quantitative results from this survey will be shared regarding faculty satisfaction with student knowledge retention and teaching workload distribution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial findings for the incorporation of ICE into the LIC curriculum show faculty prefer a hybrid LIC over a traditional LIC. Results also showed satisfaction with student learning outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39219,"journal":{"name":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","volume":"78 suppl 5","pages":"s32-s33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Longitudinal Integrated Clerkship (LIC) curricula have gained popularity among medical schools due to their demonstrated benefits in fostering improved relationships among patients, students, and faculty compared to traditional block schedules. The University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine (SSOM) adopted a comprehensive LIC curriculum for all campuses in 2014. SSOM encompasses four campuses distributed across the state. Faculty sufficiency has presented a persistent challenge, complicating student scheduling. Additionally, dissatisfaction among faculty regarding patient continuity has emerged as a key concern. To address this, inpatient clinical experiences were incorporated into the LIC curriculum in 2023.

Methods: A pre- and post-implementation mixed-methods analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of inpatient clinical experiences on faculty satisfaction. Participants included teaching faculty who completed anonymous online surveys evaluating their satisfaction with the LIC schedule and patient continuity. The first survey was conducted in December 2022 for faculty enrolled in the 2022-23 LIC cohort prior to the implementation of inpatient clinical experiences (ICE). Subsequent surveys were conducted in 2023 and 2024 after implementation of ICE.

Results: In 2022, 79% of faculty expressed satisfaction with the traditional LIC schedule, yet 30% of faculty (N=92) reported dissatisfaction with patient continuity. Since the implementation of ICE weeks into the LIC, the 2024 faculty reported 73% (N=60) prefer the new hybrid model and 15% (N=12) prefer the traditional LIC. The hybrid model demonstrated a 29% (N=26) dissatisfaction rating for teaching continuity. However, 56% (N=48) of faculty reported satisfaction with student learning outcomes. Further qualitative and quantitative results from this survey will be shared regarding faculty satisfaction with student knowledge retention and teaching workload distribution.

Conclusion: Initial findings for the incorporation of ICE into the LIC curriculum show faculty prefer a hybrid LIC over a traditional LIC. Results also showed satisfaction with student learning outcomes.

纵向综合见习课程中院系对住院病人临床经验的看法:一项横断面研究。
目的:纵向综合见习(LIC)课程在医学院中越来越受欢迎,因为与传统的分班教学相比,它在促进患者、学生和教师之间的关系方面表现出了明显的好处。2014年,南达科他州大学桑福德医学院(SSOM)在所有校区采用了全面的LIC课程。SSOM包括分布在全州的四个校区。师资力量的充足是一个持续的挑战,使学生的日程安排复杂化。此外,教师对患者连续性的不满已成为一个关键问题。为了解决这个问题,住院临床经验在2023年被纳入LIC课程。方法:采用实施前后混合方法分析住院患者临床体验对教师满意度的影响。参与者包括教师,他们完成了匿名在线调查,评估他们对LIC计划和患者连续性的满意度。第一次调查是在实施住院临床经验(ICE)之前,于2022年12月对参加2022-23年LIC队列的教师进行的。ICE实施后的后续调查分别在2023年和2024年进行。结果:2022年,79%的教师对传统的LIC计划表示满意,但30%的教师(N=92)对患者的连续性表示不满。自ICE周在LIC中实施以来,2024年的教师报告说,73% (N=60)的人更喜欢新的混合模式,15% (N=12)的人更喜欢传统的LIC。混合模式显示29% (N=26)对教学连续性不满意。然而,56% (N=48)的教师对学生的学习成果表示满意。本调查的进一步定性和定量结果将分享有关教师对学生知识保留和教学工作量分配的满意度。结论:将ICE纳入LIC课程的初步发现表明,教师更喜欢混合LIC而不是传统LIC。结果还显示了学生对学习成果的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信