Intravenous proton pump inhibitors vs oral potassium competitive acid blockers before endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Na Rae Lim, Woo Chul Chung
{"title":"Intravenous proton pump inhibitors <i>vs</i> oral potassium competitive acid blockers before endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.","authors":"Na Rae Lim, Woo Chul Chung","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.104234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with the intent of reducing gastric acidity to the desired therapeutic level for treating bleeding peptic ulcer still has several limitations.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare intravenous PPIs and oral potassium competitive acid blockers (PCABs) administered prior to endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study involved 105 consecutive patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (treated August 2023 to February 2024). Prior to emergency endoscopy, patients received either intravenous PPI (pantoprazole 80 mg bolus) or oral PCAB (tegoprazan 50 mg single-dose). Severity of bleeding was assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall, and AIMS65 scoring systems. Patients with severe comorbidities were excluded. Primary outcomes included need for therapeutic endoscopic intervention and occurrence of re-bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to adjust for potential confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total of the 105 patients, 61 received intravenous PPI injection and 44 received oral PCAB prior to emergency endoscopy. To minimize selection bias, bleeding severity was assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores, with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups. During emergency endoscopy performed within 48 hours, ulcer bed status was classified according to the Forrest classification. The proportion of lesions graded IIa or higher was significantly lower in the PCAB group (<i>P</i> < 0.001), as was the frequency of therapeutic endoscopy intervention (odds ratio = 0.272, 95% confidence interval: 0.111-0.665, <i>P</i> = 0.004). The frequency of re-bleeding events was statistically significantly higher in the PPI group (odds ratio = 0.141, 95% confidence interval: 0.024-0.844, <i>P</i> = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-endoscopic PCAB administration is more effective than PPI injection for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and may reduce ulcer bleeding mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"17 6","pages":"104234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12179963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i6.104234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with the intent of reducing gastric acidity to the desired therapeutic level for treating bleeding peptic ulcer still has several limitations.

Aim: To compare intravenous PPIs and oral potassium competitive acid blockers (PCABs) administered prior to endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 105 consecutive patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (treated August 2023 to February 2024). Prior to emergency endoscopy, patients received either intravenous PPI (pantoprazole 80 mg bolus) or oral PCAB (tegoprazan 50 mg single-dose). Severity of bleeding was assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall, and AIMS65 scoring systems. Patients with severe comorbidities were excluded. Primary outcomes included need for therapeutic endoscopic intervention and occurrence of re-bleeding. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to adjust for potential confounding factors.

Results: Total of the 105 patients, 61 received intravenous PPI injection and 44 received oral PCAB prior to emergency endoscopy. To minimize selection bias, bleeding severity was assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores, with no statistically significant differences observed between the two groups. During emergency endoscopy performed within 48 hours, ulcer bed status was classified according to the Forrest classification. The proportion of lesions graded IIa or higher was significantly lower in the PCAB group (P < 0.001), as was the frequency of therapeutic endoscopy intervention (odds ratio = 0.272, 95% confidence interval: 0.111-0.665, P = 0.004). The frequency of re-bleeding events was statistically significantly higher in the PPI group (odds ratio = 0.141, 95% confidence interval: 0.024-0.844, P = 0.032).

Conclusion: Pre-endoscopic PCAB administration is more effective than PPI injection for upper gastrointestinal bleeding and may reduce ulcer bleeding mortality.

内镜下治疗出血性消化性溃疡前静脉注射质子泵抑制剂与口服竞争性钾酸阻滞剂的比较。
背景:使用质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)将胃酸降低到理想的治疗水平来治疗出血性消化性溃疡仍然有一些局限性。目的:比较内窥镜治疗出血性消化性溃疡前静脉注射PPIs和口服钾竞争酸阻滞剂(PCABs)的效果。方法:本回顾性研究纳入105例非静脉曲张性上消化道出血患者(治疗时间为2023年8月至2024年2月)。在急诊内窥镜检查之前,患者接受静脉PPI(泮托拉唑80 mg丸剂)或口服PCAB(替戈拉赞50 mg单剂)。使用Glasgow-Blatchford、Rockall和AIMS65评分系统评估出血严重程度。排除有严重合并症的患者。主要结果包括治疗性内镜干预的需要和再出血的发生。采用多变量逻辑回归来调整潜在的混杂因素。结果:105例患者中,61例在急诊内镜检查前接受静脉注射PPI, 44例接受口服PCAB。为了尽量减少选择偏差,使用Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall和AIMS65评分评估出血严重程度,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在48小时内进行急诊内窥镜检查时,根据Forrest分类对溃疡床况进行分类。PCAB组IIa级及以上病变比例显著降低(P < 0.001),治疗性内镜干预频率显著降低(优势比= 0.272,95%可信区间:0.111-0.665,P = 0.004)。PPI组再出血事件发生频率显著高于PPI组(优势比0.141,95%可信区间0.024-0.844,P = 0.032)。结论:内镜前给予PCAB治疗上消化道出血比注射PPI更有效,并可降低溃疡出血死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信