Comparative study on school-based mental health literacy in three Asian countries.

IF 3.6 Q1 TROPICAL MEDICINE
Fumiko Shibuya, Masahide Usami, Marian Danille Santillan, Cut Warnaini, Ernesto Gregorio, Naoko Satake, Crystal Amiel Estrada, Gunawan Gunawan, Norieta Balderrama, Japhet Fernandez de Leon, Joie Fe Ancheta, Hamsu Kadriyan, Fernando Garcia, Jun Kobayashi
{"title":"Comparative study on school-based mental health literacy in three Asian countries.","authors":"Fumiko Shibuya, Masahide Usami, Marian Danille Santillan, Cut Warnaini, Ernesto Gregorio, Naoko Satake, Crystal Amiel Estrada, Gunawan Gunawan, Norieta Balderrama, Japhet Fernandez de Leon, Joie Fe Ancheta, Hamsu Kadriyan, Fernando Garcia, Jun Kobayashi","doi":"10.1186/s41182-025-00697-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mental health literacy is essential for the recognition, management, and prevention of mental disorders among school-aged children. However, few studies have examined the implementation status of school-based mental health literacy in Asian countries. This study aims to compare the approaches taken by the Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan in managing school-based mental health literacy through curriculum-related policies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The collected documents of this study analyzed both policies (formulated from 2000 to 2023) and curricula (from grade 1 to grade 12) that were adapted to the deductive content analysis methods. Policies were analyzed using the policy triangle framework (Walt and Gilson in Health Policy Plan 9:353-370, 1994) and mapped using the review points (Margaretha et al. in Front Psychiatry 14:1126767, 2023). Curricula were analyzed using the definition of mental health literacy (Jorm in Am Psychol 67:231-243, 2012). This study focused on mental health laws and policies in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan, highlighting their success in addressing the needs of adults and school-aged children. By considering each country's unique socio-cultural contexts and basic educational approaches, this study identified diverse strategies and methodologies in addressing mental health challenges. Using a common analytic framework, this study collected and analyzed policies and curricula on mental health literacy from the three countries (Philippines, 22; Indonesia, 9; and Japan, 6). The basic education curricula developed by their respective Ministries of Education were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study highlights two key findings on school-based mental health literacy. First, mental health literacy is incorporated into health and physical education in Japan, health, values education and homeroom guidance in the Philippines, and religious education in Indonesia. Second, while the Philippines and Indonesia implement mental health education based on established policies, Japan lacks a core mental health literacy policy but has developed and implemented related curricula through its course of study guidelines. The curriculum analysis identified a specific challenge: a lack of \"first aid skills to support others who are developing a mental disorder or are in a mental health crisis\".</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed the partial implementation of mental health literacy education in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan. The Philippines offers a nearly comprehensive curriculum on mental health literacy (grades 1-12), Japan incorporates it into health education (grades 5-10), and Indonesia integrates it into religious education (grades 1-12). While the Philippines and Indonesia align with mental health policies, Japan relies on its national curriculum without a core policy. A key challenge was indicated involving teachers, guidance counselors, or school health personnel as key actors to support students with mental disorders or those potentially at risk, as well as to handle emergency cases of mental disorders in schools. Recommendations include systematic monitoring of the implementation of school-based mental health policies, collaboration with UN agencies to align with international standards while incorporating culturally tailored strategies for each country.</p>","PeriodicalId":23311,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Health","volume":"53 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-025-00697-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TROPICAL MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mental health literacy is essential for the recognition, management, and prevention of mental disorders among school-aged children. However, few studies have examined the implementation status of school-based mental health literacy in Asian countries. This study aims to compare the approaches taken by the Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan in managing school-based mental health literacy through curriculum-related policies.

Methods: The collected documents of this study analyzed both policies (formulated from 2000 to 2023) and curricula (from grade 1 to grade 12) that were adapted to the deductive content analysis methods. Policies were analyzed using the policy triangle framework (Walt and Gilson in Health Policy Plan 9:353-370, 1994) and mapped using the review points (Margaretha et al. in Front Psychiatry 14:1126767, 2023). Curricula were analyzed using the definition of mental health literacy (Jorm in Am Psychol 67:231-243, 2012). This study focused on mental health laws and policies in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan, highlighting their success in addressing the needs of adults and school-aged children. By considering each country's unique socio-cultural contexts and basic educational approaches, this study identified diverse strategies and methodologies in addressing mental health challenges. Using a common analytic framework, this study collected and analyzed policies and curricula on mental health literacy from the three countries (Philippines, 22; Indonesia, 9; and Japan, 6). The basic education curricula developed by their respective Ministries of Education were used.

Results: This study highlights two key findings on school-based mental health literacy. First, mental health literacy is incorporated into health and physical education in Japan, health, values education and homeroom guidance in the Philippines, and religious education in Indonesia. Second, while the Philippines and Indonesia implement mental health education based on established policies, Japan lacks a core mental health literacy policy but has developed and implemented related curricula through its course of study guidelines. The curriculum analysis identified a specific challenge: a lack of "first aid skills to support others who are developing a mental disorder or are in a mental health crisis".

Conclusions: This study revealed the partial implementation of mental health literacy education in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan. The Philippines offers a nearly comprehensive curriculum on mental health literacy (grades 1-12), Japan incorporates it into health education (grades 5-10), and Indonesia integrates it into religious education (grades 1-12). While the Philippines and Indonesia align with mental health policies, Japan relies on its national curriculum without a core policy. A key challenge was indicated involving teachers, guidance counselors, or school health personnel as key actors to support students with mental disorders or those potentially at risk, as well as to handle emergency cases of mental disorders in schools. Recommendations include systematic monitoring of the implementation of school-based mental health policies, collaboration with UN agencies to align with international standards while incorporating culturally tailored strategies for each country.

亚洲三国校本心理健康素养比较研究。
心理健康素养对于识别、管理和预防学龄儿童精神障碍至关重要。然而,很少有研究调查了亚洲国家以学校为基础的心理健康素养的实施状况。本研究旨在比较菲律宾、印度尼西亚和日本在通过课程相关政策管理学校心理健康素养方面所采取的方法。方法:本研究收集的文献对适用演绎内容分析法的政策(2000年至2023年制定)和课程(1年级至12年级)进行分析。使用政策三角框架(Walt和Gilson在卫生政策计划中:353-370,1994)对政策进行分析,并使用审查点(Margaretha等人在Front Psychiatry中:1126767,2023)绘制地图。使用心理健康素养的定义对课程进行分析(Jorm in Am Psychol 67:231-243, 2012)。本研究的重点是菲律宾、印度尼西亚和日本的心理健康法律和政策,强调了它们在解决成人和学龄儿童需求方面的成功。考虑到每个国家独特的社会文化背景和基本教育方法,本研究确定了应对心理健康挑战的各种战略和方法。使用一个共同的分析框架,本研究收集和分析了三个国家(菲律宾,22;印度尼西亚,9;日本6)。使用了各自教育部制定的基础教育课程。结果:本研究强调了学校心理健康素养的两个主要发现。首先,心理健康素养在日本被纳入健康和体育教育,在菲律宾被纳入健康、价值观教育和课堂指导,在印度尼西亚被纳入宗教教育。第二,菲律宾和印度尼西亚根据既定政策实施心理健康教育,而日本缺乏核心的心理健康扫盲政策,但通过其课程学习指南制定并实施了相关课程。课程分析确定了一个具体的挑战:缺乏“急救技能,以支持正在发展精神障碍或处于精神健康危机中的其他人”。结论:本研究揭示了菲律宾、印度尼西亚和日本的部分心理健康素养教育的实施情况。菲律宾提供了几乎全面的心理健康素养课程(1-12年级),日本将其纳入健康教育(5-10年级),印度尼西亚将其纳入宗教教育(1-12年级)。菲律宾和印度尼西亚的精神卫生政策是一致的,而日本依靠的是没有核心政策的国家课程。与会者指出,一项关键挑战涉及教师、辅导员或学校保健人员作为关键行为者,为患有精神障碍或有潜在风险的学生提供支持,并处理学校精神障碍的紧急情况。建议包括系统监测以学校为基础的精神卫生政策的执行情况,与联合国机构合作,以与国际标准保持一致,同时纳入适合每个国家文化的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine and Health
Tropical Medicine and Health TROPICAL MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信