Posttraumatic stress symptoms in Australian parents of autistic children: Factor structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (PCL-5).

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Kylie Hinde, Gert Martin Hald, David Hallford, John Gilmour, Mikkel Arendt, Silvia Pavan, David Austin
{"title":"Posttraumatic stress symptoms in Australian parents of autistic children: Factor structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (PCL-5).","authors":"Kylie Hinde, Gert Martin Hald, David Hallford, John Gilmour, Mikkel Arendt, Silvia Pavan, David Austin","doi":"10.1037/tra0001959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research indicates that parents of autistic children may have a higher risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than parents of neurotypical children. This study was to determine the optimal factor structure of two trauma screening assessments: the PTSD Checklist for <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5)</i> and the International Trauma Questionnaire, within this parent population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis examined and compared one novel <i>DSM-5</i> model and 14 previously identified <i>DSM-5</i> and <i>International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11)</i> trauma symptom models among Australian parents of autistic children (<i>N</i> = 563).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three <i>DSM-5</i> PTSD models (anhedonia, hybrid, and intrusion/distress) provided a marginal fit, with the novel intrusion/distress model offering a superior fit. None of the five <i>DSM-5</i> models tested achieved a good overall fit. For <i>ICD-11</i>, a three-factor model best fit the latent structure of PTSD symptoms. For complex PTSD (CPTSD), a two-factor second-order model and a six-factor first-order model provided a superior fit over five alternative CPTSD models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results strongly support the internal reliability and construct validity of the <i>ICD-11</i> PTSD and CPTSD models in Australian parents of autistic children, as measured by the International Trauma Questionnaire. The <i>ICD-11</i> models outperformed the best <i>DSM-5</i> models, highlighting their superiority for this population. While more complex <i>DSM-5</i> models showed better fit than simpler ones, they still did not achieve a good overall fit. Notably, the results were largely consistent when assessing individuals meeting Criterion A for PTSD, specifically in relation to parenting-related traumatic experiences. The International Trauma Questionnaire is a more reliable and suitable tool for assessing PTSD and CPTSD in Australian parents of autistic children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001959","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Research indicates that parents of autistic children may have a higher risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) than parents of neurotypical children. This study was to determine the optimal factor structure of two trauma screening assessments: the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) and the International Trauma Questionnaire, within this parent population.

Method: Confirmatory factor analysis examined and compared one novel DSM-5 model and 14 previously identified DSM-5 and International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11) trauma symptom models among Australian parents of autistic children (N = 563).

Results: Three DSM-5 PTSD models (anhedonia, hybrid, and intrusion/distress) provided a marginal fit, with the novel intrusion/distress model offering a superior fit. None of the five DSM-5 models tested achieved a good overall fit. For ICD-11, a three-factor model best fit the latent structure of PTSD symptoms. For complex PTSD (CPTSD), a two-factor second-order model and a six-factor first-order model provided a superior fit over five alternative CPTSD models.

Conclusions: Results strongly support the internal reliability and construct validity of the ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD models in Australian parents of autistic children, as measured by the International Trauma Questionnaire. The ICD-11 models outperformed the best DSM-5 models, highlighting their superiority for this population. While more complex DSM-5 models showed better fit than simpler ones, they still did not achieve a good overall fit. Notably, the results were largely consistent when assessing individuals meeting Criterion A for PTSD, specifically in relation to parenting-related traumatic experiences. The International Trauma Questionnaire is a more reliable and suitable tool for assessing PTSD and CPTSD in Australian parents of autistic children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

澳大利亚自闭症儿童父母的创伤后应激症状:国际创伤问卷(ITQ)和精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版(PCL-5)的创伤后应激障碍检查表的因素结构
目的:研究表明自闭症儿童的父母患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险高于正常儿童的父母。本研究旨在确定两种创伤筛查评估的最佳因素结构:《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)的创伤后应激障碍检查表和国际创伤问卷。方法:验证性因素分析对澳大利亚自闭症儿童父母(N = 563)的一个新的DSM-5模型和14个先前确定的DSM-5和国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)创伤症状模型进行了检验和比较。结果:三种DSM-5创伤后应激障碍模型(快感缺乏、混合型和入侵/痛苦)提供了边际拟合,新的入侵/痛苦模型提供了更好的拟合。测试的五种DSM-5模型都没有达到良好的整体契合。对于ICD-11,三因素模型最适合PTSD症状的潜在结构。对于复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD),两因素二阶模型和六因素一阶模型的拟合效果优于其他五种CPTSD模型。结论:采用国际创伤问卷对澳大利亚自闭症儿童父母的ICD-11 PTSD和CPTSD模型进行了测量,结果强烈支持其内部信度和结构效度。ICD-11模型优于最好的DSM-5模型,突出了它们在这一人群中的优势。虽然更复杂的DSM-5模型比简单的模型显示出更好的拟合,但它们仍然没有达到良好的整体拟合。值得注意的是,在评估符合PTSD标准A的个体时,尤其是与养育子女相关的创伤经历时,结果基本一致。国际创伤问卷是评估澳大利亚自闭症儿童父母PTSD和CPTSD的更可靠和合适的工具。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信