Mary L Duet, Eric Zeng, Michael K Boyajian, Donald T Browne, Abigail Peoples, Marion Tapp, Robert Siska, Thomas Steele, Bennett W Calder, Christopher Runyan, Lisa R David
{"title":"First-in-human Testing of a Novel Sutureless Drain Securement Device: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Mary L Duet, Eric Zeng, Michael K Boyajian, Donald T Browne, Abigail Peoples, Marion Tapp, Robert Siska, Thomas Steele, Bennett W Calder, Christopher Runyan, Lisa R David","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Suture-based drain securement is nonstandardized and causes discomfort, particularly at the site of fixation as drain movement is transmitted to a focal point. Patients may experience skin irritation, pain, skin tugging, and loosening or unintended loss of the drain. A novel sutureless drain securement device, K-LOCK, was designed with patient safety and comfort in mind to reduce risks associated with drain displacement and loss, potentially leading to complications or additional interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After institutional review board approval, 21 patients were enrolled in a randomized control trial after obtaining informed consent. Inclusion criteria required patients to be 18 years of age or older and undergoing a surgery involving placement of bilateral drains. Those with adhesive allergies were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive a right or left K-LOCK with the contralateral site undergoing suture-based drain securement. Outcomes included time to secure drains, adverse outcomes, patient satisfaction, and a blinded evaluation of skin sites at drain removal. Analysis was performed using paired <i>t</i> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No drain securement failure was encountered. The average duration of drain placement was 9 days. Securement of the K-LOCK was significantly faster (<i>P</i> = 0.0008) when compared with traditional suture. Blinded skin site evaluations concluded there was no significant difference in erythema and blistering (<i>P</i> = 0.9384, <i>P</i> = 0.6058, respectively). Patients overwhelmingly favored the K-LOCK in all surveyed categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The K-LOCK enhances the patient experience with surgical drains and offers a reliable, standardized alternative to traditional drain securement. Although these findings are promising, larger multicenter trials with long-term follow-up will be necessary to comprehensively assess the device.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 6","pages":"e6888"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Suture-based drain securement is nonstandardized and causes discomfort, particularly at the site of fixation as drain movement is transmitted to a focal point. Patients may experience skin irritation, pain, skin tugging, and loosening or unintended loss of the drain. A novel sutureless drain securement device, K-LOCK, was designed with patient safety and comfort in mind to reduce risks associated with drain displacement and loss, potentially leading to complications or additional interventions.
Methods: After institutional review board approval, 21 patients were enrolled in a randomized control trial after obtaining informed consent. Inclusion criteria required patients to be 18 years of age or older and undergoing a surgery involving placement of bilateral drains. Those with adhesive allergies were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive a right or left K-LOCK with the contralateral site undergoing suture-based drain securement. Outcomes included time to secure drains, adverse outcomes, patient satisfaction, and a blinded evaluation of skin sites at drain removal. Analysis was performed using paired t tests.
Results: No drain securement failure was encountered. The average duration of drain placement was 9 days. Securement of the K-LOCK was significantly faster (P = 0.0008) when compared with traditional suture. Blinded skin site evaluations concluded there was no significant difference in erythema and blistering (P = 0.9384, P = 0.6058, respectively). Patients overwhelmingly favored the K-LOCK in all surveyed categories.
Conclusions: The K-LOCK enhances the patient experience with surgical drains and offers a reliable, standardized alternative to traditional drain securement. Although these findings are promising, larger multicenter trials with long-term follow-up will be necessary to comprehensively assess the device.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.