Efficacy and Temporal Dynamics of Genicular Nerve Block in Primary and Secondary Knee Osteoarthritis for Pain and Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S518315
Ziqing Li, Yang Bai, Cheng Liu, Yanglin Gu
{"title":"Efficacy and Temporal Dynamics of Genicular Nerve Block in Primary and Secondary Knee Osteoarthritis for Pain and Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Ziqing Li, Yang Bai, Cheng Liu, Yanglin Gu","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S518315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Genicular nerve block (GNB) has emerged as a promising intervention for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), yet its comparative efficacy remains incompletely understood. The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of GNB in reducing pain and improving function for primary or secondary KOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to October 9, 2024, for randomized controlled trials comparing GNB with other therapies. The data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4, and study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included six RCTs involving a total of 420 participants. Results revealed that GNB significantly reduced pain (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.48-1.52, p=0.0002) and improved function (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.37-1.77, p=0.003) compared to other interventions. Subgroup analyses showed that GNB provided better pain relief at 2 weeks (SMD=1.21; 95% CI: 0.09-2.33; P=0.03) and greater functional improvement at 12 weeks (SMD=1.13; 95% CI: 0.10-2.16; P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review suggested GNB as an effective intervention for KOA management, with distinct temporal patterns for pain relief and functional improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"3037-3048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12182070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S518315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Genicular nerve block (GNB) has emerged as a promising intervention for knee osteoarthritis (KOA), yet its comparative efficacy remains incompletely understood. The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of GNB in reducing pain and improving function for primary or secondary KOA.

Methods: We conducted systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to October 9, 2024, for randomized controlled trials comparing GNB with other therapies. The data were analyzed using Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4, and study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Results: This study included six RCTs involving a total of 420 participants. Results revealed that GNB significantly reduced pain (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.48-1.52, p=0.0002) and improved function (SMD = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.37-1.77, p=0.003) compared to other interventions. Subgroup analyses showed that GNB provided better pain relief at 2 weeks (SMD=1.21; 95% CI: 0.09-2.33; P=0.03) and greater functional improvement at 12 weeks (SMD=1.13; 95% CI: 0.10-2.16; P=0.03).

Conclusion: This review suggested GNB as an effective intervention for KOA management, with distinct temporal patterns for pain relief and functional improvement.

膝神经阻滞治疗原发性和继发性膝关节骨关节炎疼痛和功能的疗效和时间动态:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:膝神经阻滞(GNB)已成为治疗膝骨关节炎(KOA)的一种有希望的干预措施,但其相对疗效仍不完全清楚。本综述的目的是评估GNB在减轻原发性或继发性KOA疼痛和改善功能方面的有效性。方法:我们对PubMed、Web of Science和Embase进行了系统检索,检索时间截止到2024年10月9日,以比较GNB与其他疗法的随机对照试验。使用Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4对数据进行分析,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。结果:本研究纳入6项随机对照试验,共420名受试者。结果显示,与其他干预措施相比,GNB显著减轻了疼痛(SMD = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.48-1.52, p=0.0002),改善了功能(SMD = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.37-1.77, p=0.003)。亚组分析显示,GNB在2周时提供了更好的疼痛缓解(SMD=1.21;95% ci: 0.09-2.33;P=0.03)和12周时更大的功能改善(SMD=1.13;95% ci: 0.10-2.16;P = 0.03)。结论:本综述提示GNB是治疗KOA的有效干预措施,其疼痛缓解和功能改善的时间模式不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信