Pre-Diagnosis Alkaline Phosphatase and Antimitochondrial Antibody Positivity Vary by Race/Ethnicity Among Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Allyce Caines, Mei Lu, Trueman Wu, Sheri Trudeau, Christina Melkonian, Humberto C Gonzalez, Amandeep K Sahota, Mark A Schmidt, Yihe Daida, Christopher L Bowlus, Stuart C Gordon
{"title":"Pre-Diagnosis Alkaline Phosphatase and Antimitochondrial Antibody Positivity Vary by Race/Ethnicity Among Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis.","authors":"Allyce Caines, Mei Lu, Trueman Wu, Sheri Trudeau, Christina Melkonian, Humberto C Gonzalez, Amandeep K Sahota, Mark A Schmidt, Yihe Daida, Christopher L Bowlus, Stuart C Gordon","doi":"10.1111/jgh.17035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is made using alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and positive antimitochondrial antibody (AMA), but these biomarkers may vary by race. There is also little known about changes in ALP in the years prior to PBC diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Fibrotic Liver Disease Consortium, we used matched pairs to evaluate racial differences in ALP for up to 5 years prior to diagnosis. We also compared rates of AMA positivity by race.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1335 confirmed PBC patients were included: 769 (58%) non-Hispanic white (NHW); 110 (8%) Black; 138 (11%) Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI); and 318 (24%) Hispanic. 774 patients had AMA test results. Black patients had significantly lower AMA positivity than NHWs. Black patients were less likely to be AMA-positive compared to NHW patients (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.86, p = 0.012). There were no significant differences in rates of AMA positivity between AAPI or  Hispanic versus NHW patients. All patient groups had elevated ALP for 2-5 years prior to diagnosis. ALP differed between Black and NHW patients only at specific times before diagnosis. There were no significant differences in ALP between Hispanic and NHW patients. AAPI patients had significantly lower ALP compared to NHWs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a diverse sample of PBC patients, we observed significant differences in AMA positivity and pre-diagnosis ALP levels by race. Future studies to better characterize PBC across racial/ethnic groups are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.17035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is made using alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and positive antimitochondrial antibody (AMA), but these biomarkers may vary by race. There is also little known about changes in ALP in the years prior to PBC diagnosis.

Methods: Using data from the Fibrotic Liver Disease Consortium, we used matched pairs to evaluate racial differences in ALP for up to 5 years prior to diagnosis. We also compared rates of AMA positivity by race.

Results: 1335 confirmed PBC patients were included: 769 (58%) non-Hispanic white (NHW); 110 (8%) Black; 138 (11%) Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI); and 318 (24%) Hispanic. 774 patients had AMA test results. Black patients had significantly lower AMA positivity than NHWs. Black patients were less likely to be AMA-positive compared to NHW patients (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.86, p = 0.012). There were no significant differences in rates of AMA positivity between AAPI or  Hispanic versus NHW patients. All patient groups had elevated ALP for 2-5 years prior to diagnosis. ALP differed between Black and NHW patients only at specific times before diagnosis. There were no significant differences in ALP between Hispanic and NHW patients. AAPI patients had significantly lower ALP compared to NHWs.

Conclusion: In a diverse sample of PBC patients, we observed significant differences in AMA positivity and pre-diagnosis ALP levels by race. Future studies to better characterize PBC across racial/ethnic groups are warranted.

原发性胆道胆管炎患者诊断前碱性磷酸酶和抗线粒体抗体阳性随种族/民族的不同而不同。
背景:原发性胆道胆管炎(PBC)的诊断主要采用碱性磷酸酶(ALP)和抗线粒体抗体(AMA)阳性,但这些生物标志物可能因种族而异。对于PBC诊断前几年ALP的变化也知之甚少。方法:使用来自纤维化肝病协会的数据,我们使用配对对来评估诊断前5年ALP的种族差异。我们还比较了不同种族的AMA阳性率。结果:纳入1335例确诊PBC患者:769例(58%)非西班牙裔白人(NHW);110(8%)黑色;亚裔美国太平洋岛民(AAPI) 138 (11%);318例(24%)西班牙裔,774例有AMA检测结果。黑人患者AMA阳性率明显低于白人患者。与非白人白人患者相比,黑人患者较少出现ama阳性(OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.86, p = 0.012)。在AAPI或西班牙裔患者与NHW患者之间,AMA阳性率无显著差异。所有患者组在诊断前2-5年均有ALP升高。Black和NHW患者的ALP仅在诊断前的特定时间存在差异。西班牙裔和非西班牙裔患者的ALP无显著差异。AAPI患者ALP明显低于NHWs患者。结论:在不同的PBC患者样本中,我们观察到不同种族的AMA阳性和诊断前ALP水平有显著差异。未来的研究,以更好地表征跨种族/族裔群体的PBC是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信