A mix methodology study to compile the factors contributing towards poor uptake of antiretroviral therapy among high-risk groups: Female sex workers, people with intravenous drug use on opiod substitution therapy.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Debjani Sengupta, Archi Chandra, Upasana Poddar, Rahul Biswas, Pramit Ghosh, Arkaprovo Pal, Sandipta Chakraborty, Debjani Guchait
{"title":"A mix methodology study to compile the factors contributing towards poor uptake of antiretroviral therapy among high-risk groups: Female sex workers, people with intravenous drug use on opiod substitution therapy.","authors":"Debjani Sengupta, Archi Chandra, Upasana Poddar, Rahul Biswas, Pramit Ghosh, Arkaprovo Pal, Sandipta Chakraborty, Debjani Guchait","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1533_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biobehavioral surveys confirm that HIV prevalence is high or 'concentrated' among 'key populations' (KPs) who have unprotected sexual contacts with multiple partners or who engage in injecting drug use. These populations include female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), hijra/transgender (TG), and people who inject drugs (PWID). Antiretroviral therapy is offered under the program of National AIDS Control to Seropositive population at the designated center. Other than the stigma of being HIV positive, there is an additional factor present among these groups of people hindering their uptake of antiretroviral therapy.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify and quantify the factors causing poor uptake of ART (antiretroviral therapy) among high risk group of subjects receiving antiretroviral therapy, namely, female sex workers (FEW) and intravenous drug users (IDU). A concurrent parallel design of mixed methodology was conducted with integration of the two arms at analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>The quantitative arm involves a retrospective cohort analysis of group on ART having \"exposure\" defined as <i>high risk behavior for</i> a period of 1 year. High-risk behavior constituted of exposure involved in commercial sex work and those exposed to intravenous drug usage. The comparator arm was sex-matched cohort who were sero-positive and on ART but did not have an \"exposure\" to defined high-risk behavior practice for a period of 1 year. The qualitative arm constituted of development of a grounded theory based on thematic analysis from coded transcripts.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Time taken to travel and expenditure incurred therein added with long waiting time compounded with loss of daily wage (reiterated in both arms) emerged to be the most prominent factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Monetary incentive for travel, single window service rapid service and process to access drugs from any center (via a central registration system if possible) may be useful.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"14 5","pages":"1657-1661"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12178470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1533_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Biobehavioral surveys confirm that HIV prevalence is high or 'concentrated' among 'key populations' (KPs) who have unprotected sexual contacts with multiple partners or who engage in injecting drug use. These populations include female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), hijra/transgender (TG), and people who inject drugs (PWID). Antiretroviral therapy is offered under the program of National AIDS Control to Seropositive population at the designated center. Other than the stigma of being HIV positive, there is an additional factor present among these groups of people hindering their uptake of antiretroviral therapy.

Aims: To identify and quantify the factors causing poor uptake of ART (antiretroviral therapy) among high risk group of subjects receiving antiretroviral therapy, namely, female sex workers (FEW) and intravenous drug users (IDU). A concurrent parallel design of mixed methodology was conducted with integration of the two arms at analysis.

Material and method: The quantitative arm involves a retrospective cohort analysis of group on ART having "exposure" defined as high risk behavior for a period of 1 year. High-risk behavior constituted of exposure involved in commercial sex work and those exposed to intravenous drug usage. The comparator arm was sex-matched cohort who were sero-positive and on ART but did not have an "exposure" to defined high-risk behavior practice for a period of 1 year. The qualitative arm constituted of development of a grounded theory based on thematic analysis from coded transcripts.

Result: Time taken to travel and expenditure incurred therein added with long waiting time compounded with loss of daily wage (reiterated in both arms) emerged to be the most prominent factor.

Conclusion: Monetary incentive for travel, single window service rapid service and process to access drugs from any center (via a central registration system if possible) may be useful.

一项混合方法研究,旨在汇编导致高危人群(女性性工作者、静脉注射药物使用阿片类替代疗法的人)接受抗逆转录病毒治疗不足的因素。
背景:生物行为调查证实,艾滋病毒流行率高或“集中”在与多名性伴侣发生无保护性接触或从事注射吸毒的“关键人群”(KPs)中。这些人群包括女性性工作者(FSW)、男男性行为者(MSM)、海吉拉/跨性别者(TG)和注射吸毒者(PWID)。根据国家艾滋病控制方案,在指定的中心向血清阳性人群提供抗逆转录病毒治疗。除了艾滋病毒阳性的耻辱感之外,在这些人群中还有一个因素阻碍了他们接受抗逆转录病毒治疗。目的:确定并量化导致接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的高危人群,即女性性工作者(FEW)和静脉吸毒者(IDU)接受抗逆转录病毒治疗不良的因素。在分析时采用两臂一体化的方法进行了混合方法学的并行设计。材料和方法:定量部分包括对ART“暴露”(定义为高风险行为)1年的组进行回顾性队列分析。高危行为包括从事商业性工作和静脉注射吸毒。比较组是性别匹配的队列,他们血清阳性,接受抗逆转录病毒治疗,但没有“暴露”于定义的高风险行为实践1年。定性方面则是基于对编码文本的主题分析,发展一种有根据的理论。结果:交通时间和交通费用,加上等待时间长,再加上每天工资的损失(双方都重申)是最突出的因素。结论:旅游奖励、单一窗口服务、快速服务和从任何中心获取药品的流程(如果可能的话,通过中央注册系统)可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信