The Small Acute Ureteral Stone Protocol: Clinical Outcomes and Relapse Patterns.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Conrad Bayley, Patrick Albers, Nicholas Dean, Matthew Mancuso, Dariusz Bochinski, Tim Wollin, Shubha De, Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan, Trevor Schuler
{"title":"The Small Acute Ureteral Stone Protocol: Clinical Outcomes and Relapse Patterns.","authors":"Conrad Bayley, Patrick Albers, Nicholas Dean, Matthew Mancuso, Dariusz Bochinski, Tim Wollin, Shubha De, Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan, Trevor Schuler","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Nephrolithiasis affects approximately 10% of North Americans, placing a significant burden on health care systems. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a novel, virtual Small Acute Ureteral Stone (SAUS) protocol for managing ureteral stones ≤5 mm, aiming to optimize resource utilization and patient care. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> A retrospective review was conducted on 209 consecutive patients enrolled in the SAUS protocol from June 2018 to May 2019. The protocol included follow-up renal bladder ultrasound and nurse case manager telephone assessment. Patients were followed for a median of 5.4 years, with data collected on stone passage rates, interventions, and long-term outcomes. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The SAUS protocol successfully redirected 53% of patients from urgent clinic visits. Of these, 98% did not necessitate urologic intervention for their small ureteral stone. Overall, 77% of patients showed radiographical confirmation of stone passage, and 74% reported being symptom-free. Only 13% of all patients underwent intervention for their initial ureteral stone. Long-term follow-up revealed that after discharge from our protocol, 67% of patients did not re-present over 5 years, and 90% remained free from urologic intervention. The study's retrospective nature and reliance on electronic medical records may have introduced bias. Patient adherence to follow-up recommendations varied, potentially affecting outcome accuracy. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The SAUS protocol demonstrates effectiveness in virtually managing small ureteral stones, reducing unnecessary clinic visits and interventions. The protocol's success suggests its potential for implementation in similar clinical scenarios, potentially reducing health care costs and improving patient care in urolithiasis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":"39 6","pages":"542-548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0883","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Nephrolithiasis affects approximately 10% of North Americans, placing a significant burden on health care systems. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a novel, virtual Small Acute Ureteral Stone (SAUS) protocol for managing ureteral stones ≤5 mm, aiming to optimize resource utilization and patient care. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 209 consecutive patients enrolled in the SAUS protocol from June 2018 to May 2019. The protocol included follow-up renal bladder ultrasound and nurse case manager telephone assessment. Patients were followed for a median of 5.4 years, with data collected on stone passage rates, interventions, and long-term outcomes. Results: The SAUS protocol successfully redirected 53% of patients from urgent clinic visits. Of these, 98% did not necessitate urologic intervention for their small ureteral stone. Overall, 77% of patients showed radiographical confirmation of stone passage, and 74% reported being symptom-free. Only 13% of all patients underwent intervention for their initial ureteral stone. Long-term follow-up revealed that after discharge from our protocol, 67% of patients did not re-present over 5 years, and 90% remained free from urologic intervention. The study's retrospective nature and reliance on electronic medical records may have introduced bias. Patient adherence to follow-up recommendations varied, potentially affecting outcome accuracy. Conclusion: The SAUS protocol demonstrates effectiveness in virtually managing small ureteral stones, reducing unnecessary clinic visits and interventions. The protocol's success suggests its potential for implementation in similar clinical scenarios, potentially reducing health care costs and improving patient care in urolithiasis management.

小急性输尿管结石治疗方案:临床结果和复发模式。
目的:肾结石影响了大约10%的北美人,给卫生保健系统带来了沉重的负担。本研究评估了一种新型虚拟急性小输尿管结石(SAUS)治疗输尿管结石≤5 mm的有效性,旨在优化资源利用和患者护理。材料与方法:2018年6月至2019年5月,对209例连续纳入SAUS方案的患者进行回顾性研究。方案包括随访膀胱超声和护士病例管理员电话评估。患者的随访时间中位数为5.4年,收集了有关结石通过率、干预措施和长期结果的数据。结果:SAUS方案成功地重定向了53%的紧急门诊就诊患者。其中,98%的患者不需要输尿管小结石的泌尿外科干预。总体而言,77%的患者表现出结石通过的影像学证实,74%的患者报告无症状。只有13%的患者接受了输尿管结石的干预治疗。长期随访显示,根据我们的方案出院后,67%的患者在5年内没有复发,90%的患者仍然没有接受泌尿系统干预。该研究的回顾性和对电子医疗记录的依赖可能会带来偏见。患者对随访建议的依从性各不相同,可能影响结果的准确性。结论:SAUS方案在治疗输尿管小结石、减少不必要的临床就诊和干预方面显示出有效性。该方案的成功表明其在类似临床情况下实施的潜力,有可能降低医疗保健成本并改善尿石症管理中的患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信