Giuseppe Forte, Francesca Favieri, Ilaria Corbo, Ilaria Chirico, Rabih Chattat, Anna Maria Della Vedova, Anna Pecchinenda, Maria Casagrande
{"title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cognitive Interventions for Healthy and Mild Cognitive Impairment Adults: A Comprehensive Umbrella Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Giuseppe Forte, Francesca Favieri, Ilaria Corbo, Ilaria Chirico, Rabih Chattat, Anna Maria Della Vedova, Anna Pecchinenda, Maria Casagrande","doi":"10.1155/jare/4397025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extensive research indicates that cognitive interventions can lead to a general improvement in cognitive functioning throughout the lifespan. In this study, we evaluate the causal evidence supporting this relationship in healthy older adults and older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by means of an umbrella meta-analysis of meta-analyses. The meta-analytic studies were identified through systematic searches in electronic databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and were included in this umbrella meta-analysis if they examined the effects of cognitive interventions, not mixed with other approaches, in healthy older adults and individuals with MCI. Of the 9734 publications that were screened, 25 met the inclusion criteria and reported comprehensive data suitable for statistical analysis. Findings showed that although the effect-sizes across studies were variable, they were consistently positive, indicating a significant impact of different cognitive interventions on global cognitive functioning, memory, executive functions, visuospatial ability, and processing speed compared to control groups. This finding suggests that the efficacy of cognitive treatments is the best option for preclinical forms of aging, such as MCI. The underlying mechanisms of the observed improvements and their implications for further studies and clinical practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4397025"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12185216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jare/4397025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Extensive research indicates that cognitive interventions can lead to a general improvement in cognitive functioning throughout the lifespan. In this study, we evaluate the causal evidence supporting this relationship in healthy older adults and older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by means of an umbrella meta-analysis of meta-analyses. The meta-analytic studies were identified through systematic searches in electronic databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and were included in this umbrella meta-analysis if they examined the effects of cognitive interventions, not mixed with other approaches, in healthy older adults and individuals with MCI. Of the 9734 publications that were screened, 25 met the inclusion criteria and reported comprehensive data suitable for statistical analysis. Findings showed that although the effect-sizes across studies were variable, they were consistently positive, indicating a significant impact of different cognitive interventions on global cognitive functioning, memory, executive functions, visuospatial ability, and processing speed compared to control groups. This finding suggests that the efficacy of cognitive treatments is the best option for preclinical forms of aging, such as MCI. The underlying mechanisms of the observed improvements and their implications for further studies and clinical practice are discussed.
广泛的研究表明,认知干预可以在整个生命周期中导致认知功能的普遍改善。在这项研究中,我们通过荟萃分析的综合荟萃分析,评估了健康老年人和轻度认知障碍老年人(MCI)之间支持这种关系的因果证据。这些荟萃分析研究是通过对电子数据库(CINAHL、Cochrane Library、PsycINFO、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science)的系统搜索确定的,如果它们在健康老年人和MCI患者中检测了认知干预的效果,而不是与其他方法混合,则被纳入该综合荟萃分析。在筛选的9734份出版物中,25份符合纳入标准,报告了适合统计分析的全面数据。研究结果表明,尽管不同研究的效应量不同,但它们始终是正的,这表明与对照组相比,不同的认知干预对整体认知功能、记忆、执行功能、视觉空间能力和处理速度有显著影响。这一发现表明,认知疗法的疗效是治疗临床前形式衰老的最佳选择,比如轻度认知损伤。本文还讨论了观察到的改善的潜在机制及其对进一步研究和临床实践的影响。