Experience of use of dalbavancin for the treatment of unlicensed indications in a UK tertiary infectious diseases setting.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Christopher A Darlow, Joseph Parsons, Danielle Lucy, Ang Li, Libuse Ratcliffe, Stacy Todd, Nicholas Wong
{"title":"Experience of use of dalbavancin for the treatment of unlicensed indications in a UK tertiary infectious diseases setting.","authors":"Christopher A Darlow, Joseph Parsons, Danielle Lucy, Ang Li, Libuse Ratcliffe, Stacy Todd, Nicholas Wong","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02585-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dalbavancin is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide with Gram-positive activity, licensed for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs), although off-licence use is increasingly prevalent. We describe our experience in Liverpool of using dalbavancin for off-licence indications and as a risk-reduction strategy in patients at risk of premature hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving dalbavancin in the period 1/9/2020-30/4/2024 in Liverpool were identified. Data was extracted by review of patient notes. Primary outcomes were clinical success (resolution of infection without re-admission or further antibiotics) and 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-five individual dalbavancin courses were identified. 24/95 were for licensed indications (i.e., ABSSSI without bacteraemia). Off-licence indications included bone and joint infections (BJIs) (30/95), infective endocarditis (IE) (13/95) and Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) (27/95). The clinical success rate and 90-day mortality for ABSSSI without bacteraemia were 91.67% and 4.17%, respectively. BJI without bacteraemia and SAB outcomes were similar (p > 0.999). However, IE had worse rates of clinical success (61.5%, p = 0.072) and 90-day mortality (30.8%, p = 0.042). 10/18 PWIDs who were prematurely discharged achieved clinical success; 17/18 were alive at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data in this retrospective analysis adds to the growing body of evidence that dalbavancin is safe and effective for the treatment of BJIs and SABs. It also reinforces the uncertainty in the literature over the efficacy of use in IE. Additionally, these data demonstrate that dalbavancin may be used successfully as a risk mitigation strategy for PWIDs who may be prematurely discharged from an inpatient stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02585-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dalbavancin is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide with Gram-positive activity, licensed for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs), although off-licence use is increasingly prevalent. We describe our experience in Liverpool of using dalbavancin for off-licence indications and as a risk-reduction strategy in patients at risk of premature hospital discharge.

Methods: Patients receiving dalbavancin in the period 1/9/2020-30/4/2024 in Liverpool were identified. Data was extracted by review of patient notes. Primary outcomes were clinical success (resolution of infection without re-admission or further antibiotics) and 90-day mortality.

Results: Ninety-five individual dalbavancin courses were identified. 24/95 were for licensed indications (i.e., ABSSSI without bacteraemia). Off-licence indications included bone and joint infections (BJIs) (30/95), infective endocarditis (IE) (13/95) and Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) (27/95). The clinical success rate and 90-day mortality for ABSSSI without bacteraemia were 91.67% and 4.17%, respectively. BJI without bacteraemia and SAB outcomes were similar (p > 0.999). However, IE had worse rates of clinical success (61.5%, p = 0.072) and 90-day mortality (30.8%, p = 0.042). 10/18 PWIDs who were prematurely discharged achieved clinical success; 17/18 were alive at 90 days.

Conclusion: The data in this retrospective analysis adds to the growing body of evidence that dalbavancin is safe and effective for the treatment of BJIs and SABs. It also reinforces the uncertainty in the literature over the efficacy of use in IE. Additionally, these data demonstrate that dalbavancin may be used successfully as a risk mitigation strategy for PWIDs who may be prematurely discharged from an inpatient stay.

背景:Dalbavancin是一种具有革兰氏阳性活性的长效脂糖肽,被许可用于治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSIs),尽管非许可使用越来越普遍。我们描述了我们在利物浦使用达尔巴伐辛的经验,用于非许可适应症,并作为风险降低策略的患者过早出院的风险。方法:选取2020年9月1日至2024年4月30日在利物浦接受达尔巴伐辛治疗的患者。数据是通过查阅患者记录提取的。主要结局是临床成功(感染消退,无再次入院或进一步使用抗生素)和90天死亡率。结果:确定了95个单独的达尔巴伐星疗程。24/95用于许可适应症(即无菌血症的ABSSSI)。非许可适应症包括骨和关节感染(BJIs)(30/95)、感染性心内膜炎(IE)(13/95)和金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB)(27/95)。无菌血症的ABSSSI临床成功率和90天死亡率分别为91.67%和4.17%。无菌血症的BJI与SAB结果相似(p < 0 0.999)。然而,IE的临床成功率(61.5%,p = 0.072)和90天死亡率(30.8%,p = 0.042)较差。10/18过早出院的PWIDs获得临床成功;其中17/18在90天存活。结论:本回顾性分析的数据增加了越来越多的证据,表明达尔巴万辛治疗BJIs和sbs是安全有效的。这也加强了文献中关于IE使用效果的不确定性。此外,这些数据表明,dalbavancin可以成功地作为一种风险缓解策略,用于可能过早出院的pwid患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信