The potential impact of clindamycin on neurosurgery patients: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Lobna W Alam El-Din, Noha A El-Bassiouny, Wael M Khedr, Rehab H Werida
{"title":"The potential impact of clindamycin on neurosurgery patients: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Lobna W Alam El-Din, Noha A El-Bassiouny, Wael M Khedr, Rehab H Werida","doi":"10.1007/s10787-025-01810-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study investigates whether adding clindamycin to neurosurgery patients' as a postsurgical management regimen improves recovery, provides neuroprotection, and prevents neurological complications. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and neurotensin (NT) were measured as biomarkers of inflammation, brain damage, and neuronal apoptosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 22 each) to receive the standard management plus either ceftriaxone (2 g / 12 h) or plus ceftriaxone and clindamycin (900 mg/8 h) as a combination therapy for seven days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NSE serum levels in the clindamycin and control group on day 3 were (10.01 ± 1.64) versus (23.77 ± 11.75), respectively (p = 0.0001). NT serum levels in the clindamycin and control groups on day 3 were (4.5 ± 2.8) versus (8.29 ± 7.97), respectively (p = 0.0418). Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on day 3 was (14.32 ± 1.13) versus (14.23 ± 1.31) in the clindamycin and the control groups, respectively, (p = 0.724). SOFA score assessed on day 3 (5 (22.7%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 1, (15 (68.25)) and (14 (63.35)) had grade 2, (1 (4.5%)) and (5 (22.7%)) had grade 3, (0 (0.0%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 4, and (1 (4.5%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 5 in the clindamycin and control groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjunctive use of clindamycin might be a novel option that reduces secondary neurological injury/damage after neurosurgeries. Further and more extensive clinical trials are warranted to confirm the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13551,"journal":{"name":"Inflammopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-025-01810-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study investigates whether adding clindamycin to neurosurgery patients' as a postsurgical management regimen improves recovery, provides neuroprotection, and prevents neurological complications. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and neurotensin (NT) were measured as biomarkers of inflammation, brain damage, and neuronal apoptosis.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 22 each) to receive the standard management plus either ceftriaxone (2 g / 12 h) or plus ceftriaxone and clindamycin (900 mg/8 h) as a combination therapy for seven days.

Results: NSE serum levels in the clindamycin and control group on day 3 were (10.01 ± 1.64) versus (23.77 ± 11.75), respectively (p = 0.0001). NT serum levels in the clindamycin and control groups on day 3 were (4.5 ± 2.8) versus (8.29 ± 7.97), respectively (p = 0.0418). Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on day 3 was (14.32 ± 1.13) versus (14.23 ± 1.31) in the clindamycin and the control groups, respectively, (p = 0.724). SOFA score assessed on day 3 (5 (22.7%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 1, (15 (68.25)) and (14 (63.35)) had grade 2, (1 (4.5%)) and (5 (22.7%)) had grade 3, (0 (0.0%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 4, and (1 (4.5%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 5 in the clindamycin and control groups, respectively.

Conclusion: Adjunctive use of clindamycin might be a novel option that reduces secondary neurological injury/damage after neurosurgeries. Further and more extensive clinical trials are warranted to confirm the findings.

克林霉素对神经外科患者的潜在影响:一项随机对照试验
目的:研究在神经外科患者中加入克林霉素作为一种术后管理方案是否能改善恢复,提供神经保护,并预防神经系统并发症。测量神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和神经紧张素(NT)作为炎症、脑损伤和神经元凋亡的生物标志物。方法:将患者随机分为两组(每组22例),接受标准治疗+头孢曲松(2 g/ 12 h)或+头孢曲松与克林霉素(900 mg/8 h)联合治疗7 d。结果:克林霉素组和对照组第3天NSE水平分别为(10.01±1.64)和(23.77±11.75),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.0001)。克林霉素组和对照组第3天NT水平分别为(4.5±2.8)和(8.29±7.97),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.0418)。克林霉素组和对照组第3天格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)分别为(14.32±1.13)和(14.23±1.31),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.724)。克林霉素组和对照组第3天SOFA评分为1级(5(22.7%)和1(4.5%)),15(68.25)和14(63.35)为2级,1(4.5%)和5(22.7%)为3级,0(0.0%)和1(4.5%)为4级,1(4.5%)和1(4.5%)为5级。结论:辅助使用克林霉素可能是减少神经外科手术后继发性神经损伤的一种新选择。需要进一步和更广泛的临床试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Inflammopharmacology
Inflammopharmacology IMMUNOLOGYTOXICOLOGY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Inflammopharmacology is the official publication of the Gastrointestinal Section of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR) and the Hungarian Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Society (HECPS). Inflammopharmacology publishes papers on all aspects of inflammation and its pharmacological control emphasizing comparisons of (a) different inflammatory states, and (b) the actions, therapeutic efficacy and safety of drugs employed in the treatment of inflammatory conditions. The comparative aspects of the types of inflammatory conditions include gastrointestinal disease (e.g. ulcerative colitis, Crohn''s disease), parasitic diseases, toxicological manifestations of the effects of drugs and environmental agents, arthritic conditions, and inflammatory effects of injury or aging on skeletal muscle. The journal has seven main interest areas: -Drug-Disease Interactions - Conditional Pharmacology - i.e. where the condition (disease or stress state) influences the therapeutic response and side (adverse) effects from anti-inflammatory drugs. Mechanisms of drug-disease and drug disease interactions and the role of different stress states -Rheumatology - particular emphasis on methods of measurement of clinical response effects of new agents, adverse effects from anti-rheumatic drugs -Gastroenterology - with particular emphasis on animal and human models, mechanisms of mucosal inflammation and ulceration and effects of novel and established anti-ulcer, anti-inflammatory agents, or antiparasitic agents -Neuro-Inflammation and Pain - model systems, pharmacology of new analgesic agents and mechanisms of neuro-inflammation and pain -Novel drugs, natural products and nutraceuticals - and their effects on inflammatory processes, especially where there are indications of novel modes action compared with conventional drugs e.g. NSAIDs -Muscle-immune interactions during inflammation [...]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信