Lobna W Alam El-Din, Noha A El-Bassiouny, Wael M Khedr, Rehab H Werida
{"title":"The potential impact of clindamycin on neurosurgery patients: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Lobna W Alam El-Din, Noha A El-Bassiouny, Wael M Khedr, Rehab H Werida","doi":"10.1007/s10787-025-01810-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study investigates whether adding clindamycin to neurosurgery patients' as a postsurgical management regimen improves recovery, provides neuroprotection, and prevents neurological complications. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and neurotensin (NT) were measured as biomarkers of inflammation, brain damage, and neuronal apoptosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 22 each) to receive the standard management plus either ceftriaxone (2 g / 12 h) or plus ceftriaxone and clindamycin (900 mg/8 h) as a combination therapy for seven days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NSE serum levels in the clindamycin and control group on day 3 were (10.01 ± 1.64) versus (23.77 ± 11.75), respectively (p = 0.0001). NT serum levels in the clindamycin and control groups on day 3 were (4.5 ± 2.8) versus (8.29 ± 7.97), respectively (p = 0.0418). Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on day 3 was (14.32 ± 1.13) versus (14.23 ± 1.31) in the clindamycin and the control groups, respectively, (p = 0.724). SOFA score assessed on day 3 (5 (22.7%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 1, (15 (68.25)) and (14 (63.35)) had grade 2, (1 (4.5%)) and (5 (22.7%)) had grade 3, (0 (0.0%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 4, and (1 (4.5%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 5 in the clindamycin and control groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjunctive use of clindamycin might be a novel option that reduces secondary neurological injury/damage after neurosurgeries. Further and more extensive clinical trials are warranted to confirm the findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":13551,"journal":{"name":"Inflammopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-025-01810-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The study investigates whether adding clindamycin to neurosurgery patients' as a postsurgical management regimen improves recovery, provides neuroprotection, and prevents neurological complications. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and neurotensin (NT) were measured as biomarkers of inflammation, brain damage, and neuronal apoptosis.
Methods: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups (n = 22 each) to receive the standard management plus either ceftriaxone (2 g / 12 h) or plus ceftriaxone and clindamycin (900 mg/8 h) as a combination therapy for seven days.
Results: NSE serum levels in the clindamycin and control group on day 3 were (10.01 ± 1.64) versus (23.77 ± 11.75), respectively (p = 0.0001). NT serum levels in the clindamycin and control groups on day 3 were (4.5 ± 2.8) versus (8.29 ± 7.97), respectively (p = 0.0418). Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) on day 3 was (14.32 ± 1.13) versus (14.23 ± 1.31) in the clindamycin and the control groups, respectively, (p = 0.724). SOFA score assessed on day 3 (5 (22.7%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 1, (15 (68.25)) and (14 (63.35)) had grade 2, (1 (4.5%)) and (5 (22.7%)) had grade 3, (0 (0.0%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 4, and (1 (4.5%)) and (1 (4.5%)) had grade 5 in the clindamycin and control groups, respectively.
Conclusion: Adjunctive use of clindamycin might be a novel option that reduces secondary neurological injury/damage after neurosurgeries. Further and more extensive clinical trials are warranted to confirm the findings.
期刊介绍:
Inflammopharmacology is the official publication of the Gastrointestinal Section of the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR) and the Hungarian Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Society (HECPS). Inflammopharmacology publishes papers on all aspects of inflammation and its pharmacological control emphasizing comparisons of (a) different inflammatory states, and (b) the actions, therapeutic efficacy and safety of drugs employed in the treatment of inflammatory conditions. The comparative aspects of the types of inflammatory conditions include gastrointestinal disease (e.g. ulcerative colitis, Crohn''s disease), parasitic diseases, toxicological manifestations of the effects of drugs and environmental agents, arthritic conditions, and inflammatory effects of injury or aging on skeletal muscle. The journal has seven main interest areas:
-Drug-Disease Interactions - Conditional Pharmacology - i.e. where the condition (disease or stress state) influences the therapeutic response and side (adverse) effects from anti-inflammatory drugs. Mechanisms of drug-disease and drug disease interactions and the role of different stress states
-Rheumatology - particular emphasis on methods of measurement of clinical response effects of new agents, adverse effects from anti-rheumatic drugs
-Gastroenterology - with particular emphasis on animal and human models, mechanisms of mucosal inflammation and ulceration and effects of novel and established anti-ulcer, anti-inflammatory agents, or antiparasitic agents
-Neuro-Inflammation and Pain - model systems, pharmacology of new analgesic agents and mechanisms of neuro-inflammation and pain
-Novel drugs, natural products and nutraceuticals - and their effects on inflammatory processes, especially where there are indications of novel modes action compared with conventional drugs e.g. NSAIDs
-Muscle-immune interactions during inflammation [...]