Younger and Older Adults' Aging Well Construals: A Quantitative Word Use and Topics Comparison.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Gerontology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1159/000545481
Valeria A Pfeifer, Kayden Jordan, Trish Davis, Matthew D Grilli, Matthias R Mehl
{"title":"Younger and Older Adults' Aging Well Construals: A Quantitative Word Use and Topics Comparison.","authors":"Valeria A Pfeifer, Kayden Jordan, Trish Davis, Matthew D Grilli, Matthias R Mehl","doi":"10.1159/000545481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals' construals of aging capture how they think of aging, and what aging well means to them. Assessing such construals is important for understanding attitudes toward aging and, ultimately, how to tailor personalized aging well interventions to an individual.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 100 younger adults (YAs)' and 92 older adults (OAs)' spoken narratives of what aging well means to them using two language analysis approaches, closed-vocabulary, word count analysis via Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and open-vocabulary, word co-occurrence analysis via topic modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>YAs' and OAs' spoken narratives differed in both word and topic use. YAs used more words related to physical aspects, more tentative language, and expressed themselves via higher status language (clout), while OAs used authentic language, i-talk, and words related to work, home, family, and religion. Topic modeling complemented the LIWC analyses and showed that YAs primarily discussed topics of bodily and cognitive decline and strategies of preventing aging, conveying concerns about, and negative stereotypes of aging. OAs topicalized family reflections, openness to new experiences, and their social engagement, signaling a more positive outlook on (continued) aging.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our complimentary word count and word co-occurrence language analyses of aging well construals revealed stark differences between YAs' and OAs' perceptions of aging well, which raise important questions about intergenerational exchanges and communications about aging more broadly. Further, we found that aging construals of OAs are useful for estimating their future outlook, an important aspect of resilience against cognitive decline and possible entry point for targeted precision aging interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":"71 5","pages":"388-399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12191769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals' construals of aging capture how they think of aging, and what aging well means to them. Assessing such construals is important for understanding attitudes toward aging and, ultimately, how to tailor personalized aging well interventions to an individual.

Methods: We analyzed 100 younger adults (YAs)' and 92 older adults (OAs)' spoken narratives of what aging well means to them using two language analysis approaches, closed-vocabulary, word count analysis via Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) and open-vocabulary, word co-occurrence analysis via topic modeling.

Results: YAs' and OAs' spoken narratives differed in both word and topic use. YAs used more words related to physical aspects, more tentative language, and expressed themselves via higher status language (clout), while OAs used authentic language, i-talk, and words related to work, home, family, and religion. Topic modeling complemented the LIWC analyses and showed that YAs primarily discussed topics of bodily and cognitive decline and strategies of preventing aging, conveying concerns about, and negative stereotypes of aging. OAs topicalized family reflections, openness to new experiences, and their social engagement, signaling a more positive outlook on (continued) aging.

Conclusion: Our complimentary word count and word co-occurrence language analyses of aging well construals revealed stark differences between YAs' and OAs' perceptions of aging well, which raise important questions about intergenerational exchanges and communications about aging more broadly. Further, we found that aging construals of OAs are useful for estimating their future outlook, an important aspect of resilience against cognitive decline and possible entry point for targeted precision aging interventions.

年轻人和老年人的老年认知:定量词汇使用和话题比较。
个人对衰老的解释反映了他们对衰老的看法,以及衰老对他们意味着什么。评估这些识解对于理解人们对衰老的态度以及最终如何为个体量身定制个性化的老龄化井干预措施非常重要。方法:采用两种语言分析方法对100名年轻人(YAs)和92名老年人(OAs)的口头叙述进行分析,即通过语言调查和单词计数(LIWC)进行封闭词汇和单词计数分析,以及通过主题建模进行开放词汇和单词共现分析。结果:青年和青年的口头叙述在用词和话题使用上都存在差异。YAs使用更多与身体方面相关的词语,更多的试探性语言,并通过更高的地位语言(影响力)来表达自己,而OAs使用真实的语言,i-talk,以及与工作,家庭,家庭和宗教相关的词语。主题建模补充了LIWC的分析,并显示asa主要讨论身体和认知能力下降以及预防衰老、传达对衰老的担忧和负面刻板印象的策略。oa将家庭反思、对新体验的开放态度和他们的社会参与作为主题,表明他们对(持续的)老龄化持更积极的态度。结论:我们对老龄井解释的字数统计和词共现语言分析揭示了年龄层和年龄层对老龄井理解的明显差异,这就提出了关于更广泛的代际交流和老龄问题沟通的重要问题。此外,我们发现oa的衰老解识有助于估计他们的未来前景,这是抵御认知衰退的一个重要方面,也是有针对性的精确衰老干预的可能切入点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontology
Gerontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信