Efficacy of different polypill combinations for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1558579
Habib Yazgi, Shivani Mattikalli, Brian Fang, Hannah Heselton, Paddy Ssentongo, Michael Farbaniec
{"title":"Efficacy of different polypill combinations for primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Habib Yazgi, Shivani Mattikalli, Brian Fang, Hannah Heselton, Paddy Ssentongo, Michael Farbaniec","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1558579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, and polypills have established efficacy in preventing poor outcomes. However, evidence on the optimal polypill combination is lacking. The objective of the study is to estimate the optimal polypill combination that maximizes cardiovascular outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched from January 1, 1960, to March 30, 2025. Studies that provided data on the association between polypill and cardiovascular outcomes were included. We estimated the effect of various polypill combinations by random-effects meta-analyses using the generic inverse variance method. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential effect modification in the association between polypill combinations and cardiovascular outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies comprising 35,833 individuals met the inclusion criteria from 6 continents. The estimated pooled effects of polypill use on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality were RR 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.89), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.98), respectively. The pooled relative risk of MACE outcome was 21% lower in combination of 4 or more pills [0.79 (95% CI, 0.55-1.15), <i>n</i> = 6 studies] vs. to 22% and 3 or less combination of medication classes (RR: 0.78 95% CI: 0.70-0.86), <i>n</i> = 4 studies). Polypill combinations containing moderate or high-intensity statins were associated with lower risk of MACE outcomes RR 0.79 95% CI: 0.70-0.97), <i>n</i> = 2 studies compared to combinations with low-intensity statins RR 0.78 95% CI: 0.59-1.03, <i>n</i> = 8). All polypills for MACE outcomes contained RAAS inhibitors. Calcium channel blockers, RAAS inhibitors and diuretics-containing polypills were associated with the highest reduction in blood pressure. Certainty of evidence for MACE ranged from low to high, with most trials rated as moderate to high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this meta-analysis, polypills with 3 cardiovascular classes that contain a high-intensity statins, aspirin and RAAS inhibitors appeared to have greater reduction in MACE outcomes. The presence of a diuretic and a calcium channel blocker in the polypill was associated with greater reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1558579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1558579","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, and polypills have established efficacy in preventing poor outcomes. However, evidence on the optimal polypill combination is lacking. The objective of the study is to estimate the optimal polypill combination that maximizes cardiovascular outcomes.

Methods: MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched from January 1, 1960, to March 30, 2025. Studies that provided data on the association between polypill and cardiovascular outcomes were included. We estimated the effect of various polypill combinations by random-effects meta-analyses using the generic inverse variance method. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore potential effect modification in the association between polypill combinations and cardiovascular outcomes.

Results: Thirty studies comprising 35,833 individuals met the inclusion criteria from 6 continents. The estimated pooled effects of polypill use on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality were RR 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.89), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.98), respectively. The pooled relative risk of MACE outcome was 21% lower in combination of 4 or more pills [0.79 (95% CI, 0.55-1.15), n = 6 studies] vs. to 22% and 3 or less combination of medication classes (RR: 0.78 95% CI: 0.70-0.86), n = 4 studies). Polypill combinations containing moderate or high-intensity statins were associated with lower risk of MACE outcomes RR 0.79 95% CI: 0.70-0.97), n = 2 studies compared to combinations with low-intensity statins RR 0.78 95% CI: 0.59-1.03, n = 8). All polypills for MACE outcomes contained RAAS inhibitors. Calcium channel blockers, RAAS inhibitors and diuretics-containing polypills were associated with the highest reduction in blood pressure. Certainty of evidence for MACE ranged from low to high, with most trials rated as moderate to high.

Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, polypills with 3 cardiovascular classes that contain a high-intensity statins, aspirin and RAAS inhibitors appeared to have greater reduction in MACE outcomes. The presence of a diuretic and a calcium channel blocker in the polypill was associated with greater reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure.

不同复方多药片预防原发性和继发性心血管疾病的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:心血管疾病是世界范围内死亡率和发病率的主要原因,多片剂在预防不良预后方面已经确立了疗效。然而,关于最佳复合药片组合的证据是缺乏的。该研究的目的是估计最佳的多药片组合,最大限度地提高心血管预后。方法:检索1960年1月1日至2025年3月30日的MEDLINE/PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane系统评价数据库。这些研究提供了多药片与心血管结局之间的关联数据。我们使用通用逆方差法通过随机效应荟萃分析估计了各种复方多药片的效果。进行亚组和荟萃回归分析,以探讨复方多药片与心血管结局之间关联的潜在效应改变。结果:来自6大洲的30项研究包括35,833名个体符合纳入标准。使用多片剂对主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、心血管死亡和全因死亡率的综合影响估计RR分别为0.78 (95% CI, 0.63-0.97)、0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.89)、0.88 (95% CI, 0.79-0.98)。联合使用4种或更多药物的MACE结果的总相对危险度降低21% [0.79 (95% CI, 0.55-1.15), n = 6项研究],而联合使用3种或更少药物的MACE结果的总相对危险度为22% (RR: 0.78 95% CI: 0.70-0.86), n = 4项研究)。与低强度他汀类药物联合使用相比,含有中等或高强度他汀类药物的多片剂联合使用MACE结局的风险较低(RR 0.79 95% CI: 0.70-0.97) (n = 2)。所有用于MACE结果的复方制剂均含有RAAS抑制剂。钙通道阻滞剂、RAAS抑制剂和含有利尿剂的多药片与血压的最大降低相关。MACE的证据确定性从低到高不等,大多数试验被评为中等到高。结论:在这项荟萃分析中,含有高强度他汀类药物、阿司匹林和RAAS抑制剂的3种心血管类复方药片似乎更能降低MACE结果。多片剂中存在利尿剂和钙通道阻滞剂与收缩压和舒张压的更大降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信