The association between one's social life and symptoms of prolonged grief following a traumatic loss: an ecological momentary assessment study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Philippa Specker, Justina Pociūnaitė-Ott, Ariela Lev Rosenblum, Sofia Marcolini, Pascale Waschnig, Christopher Magoon, Annie-Lori Joseph, Lieke C J Nijborg, Xi Pan, Lonneke I M Lenferink
{"title":"The association between one's social life and symptoms of prolonged grief following a traumatic loss: an ecological momentary assessment study.","authors":"Philippa Specker, Justina Pociūnaitė-Ott, Ariela Lev Rosenblum, Sofia Marcolini, Pascale Waschnig, Christopher Magoon, Annie-Lori Joseph, Lieke C J Nijborg, Xi Pan, Lonneke I M Lenferink","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2515705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> A strong social safety net may play a key role in protecting people from developing prolonged grief disorder (PGD) after a traumatic loss. This has mainly been investigated cross-sectionally, whereby people usually report on their social life and PGD reactions during the past month. However, retrospectively recalling experiences is prone to recall bias.<b>Objective:</b> As such, we investigated the associations between pleasantness of social interactions and PGD reactions in traumatically bereaved people using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA).<b>Methods:</b> People whose loved one died due to homicide, suicide, or accident at least 12 months earlier (<i>N</i> = 36, 78% women, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 56, 47% met PGD criteria) received smartphone-based surveys five times per day for two weeks. Surveys included questions about PGD intensity (e.g. 'In the past 3 hours, did you yearn for your loved one?' 0 = not at all, 6 = extremely) and their quality of social life (e.g. 'In the past 3 hours, how did you find being with others?' 0 = very unpleasant, 6 = very pleasant). Linear mixed models were used.<b>Results:</b> Based on 2520 measurement occasions, we found that when a person enjoyed their social life more than usual, they grieved less (<i>B</i> = -0.141, <i>SE</i> = 0.020, <i>p</i> < .001). However, whether a person's social life was more or less pleasant than their peers was not related to their PGD levels.<b>Conclusions:</b> This EMA study highlights the importance of accounting for individual variability in grief reactions after loss and highlights the potential utility of strengthening one's social safety net as a way to reduce the burden of PGD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2515705"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2515705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A strong social safety net may play a key role in protecting people from developing prolonged grief disorder (PGD) after a traumatic loss. This has mainly been investigated cross-sectionally, whereby people usually report on their social life and PGD reactions during the past month. However, retrospectively recalling experiences is prone to recall bias.Objective: As such, we investigated the associations between pleasantness of social interactions and PGD reactions in traumatically bereaved people using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA).Methods: People whose loved one died due to homicide, suicide, or accident at least 12 months earlier (N = 36, 78% women, Mage = 56, 47% met PGD criteria) received smartphone-based surveys five times per day for two weeks. Surveys included questions about PGD intensity (e.g. 'In the past 3 hours, did you yearn for your loved one?' 0 = not at all, 6 = extremely) and their quality of social life (e.g. 'In the past 3 hours, how did you find being with others?' 0 = very unpleasant, 6 = very pleasant). Linear mixed models were used.Results: Based on 2520 measurement occasions, we found that when a person enjoyed their social life more than usual, they grieved less (B = -0.141, SE = 0.020, p < .001). However, whether a person's social life was more or less pleasant than their peers was not related to their PGD levels.Conclusions: This EMA study highlights the importance of accounting for individual variability in grief reactions after loss and highlights the potential utility of strengthening one's social safety net as a way to reduce the burden of PGD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一个人的社会生活与创伤性损失后长期悲伤症状之间的联系:一项生态瞬间评估研究。
背景:一个强大的社会安全网可能在保护人们在创伤性损失后不发展为长期悲伤障碍(PGD)方面发挥关键作用。这主要是横断面调查,即人们通常报告他们在过去一个月的社会生活和PGD反应。然而,回顾性地回忆经历容易产生回忆偏差。目的:因此,我们使用生态瞬间评估(EMA)来研究创伤性丧亲者的社会互动愉悦度与PGD反应之间的关系。方法:亲人在至少12个月前因他杀、自杀或事故死亡的人(N = 36, 78%的女性,Mage = 56, 47%符合PGD标准)每天接受5次基于智能手机的调查,持续两周。调查包括关于PGD强度的问题(例如:“在过去的三个小时里,你是否想念你的爱人?”“0 =一点也不,6 =非常”,以及他们的社会生活质量(例如;“在过去的3个小时里,你觉得和别人在一起怎么样?”0 =非常不愉快,6 =非常愉快)。采用线性混合模型。结果:基于2520个测量场合,我们发现当一个人比平时更享受他们的社交生活时,他们的悲伤更少(B = -0.141, SE = 0.020, p)。结论:这项EMA研究强调了在失去亲人后悲伤反应中考虑个体差异的重要性,并强调了加强社会安全网作为一种减轻PGD负担的潜在效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信