Shared decision-making for older adults in the peri-operative setting: A narrative review.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-23 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002224
Yotam Weiss, Shiri Zarour, Mark D Neuman, Mary C Politi, Victoria L Tang, Mia Gisselbaek, Joana Berger-Estilita, Sarah Saxena
{"title":"Shared decision-making for older adults in the peri-operative setting: A narrative review.","authors":"Yotam Weiss, Shiri Zarour, Mark D Neuman, Mary C Politi, Victoria L Tang, Mia Gisselbaek, Joana Berger-Estilita, Sarah Saxena","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults undergoing surgery often face numerous challenges to healthcare decisions due to frailty, comorbidities and varying personal priorities. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a patient-centred approach that enhances peri-operative care by aligning medical decisions with individual values and preferences. When considering surgery for an older adult, SDM can ensure that the surgical treatment plan focuses on what older adults find important, such as quality of life (QOL), functional independence, long-term well being and survival. This narrative review explores the role of SDM in peri-operative care of older adults and strategies for increasing SDM in this context. SDM fosters collaboration between patients, families and healthcare teams; as a result, it can lead to improved patient satisfaction, reduced decisional conflict and greater trust between patients and their medical teams. However, integrating SDM into routine practice remains complex due to cognitive impairment, communication barriers, time constraints and gaps in evidence. Effective SDM strategies include enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration, improving clinician and staff training, developing decision aids tailored to older adults considering surgery and leveraging technology to support patient engagement. Future efforts should focus on expanding SDM research, refining implementation frameworks and advocating for policy changes that facilitate patient-centred surgical decision-making in older adults. As the global population ages, prioritising SDM in peri-operative care will be critical to optimising patient outcomes, ensuring ethical, informed decision-making and aligning care plans with the patient's goals and values.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"767-773"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults undergoing surgery often face numerous challenges to healthcare decisions due to frailty, comorbidities and varying personal priorities. Shared decision-making (SDM) is a patient-centred approach that enhances peri-operative care by aligning medical decisions with individual values and preferences. When considering surgery for an older adult, SDM can ensure that the surgical treatment plan focuses on what older adults find important, such as quality of life (QOL), functional independence, long-term well being and survival. This narrative review explores the role of SDM in peri-operative care of older adults and strategies for increasing SDM in this context. SDM fosters collaboration between patients, families and healthcare teams; as a result, it can lead to improved patient satisfaction, reduced decisional conflict and greater trust between patients and their medical teams. However, integrating SDM into routine practice remains complex due to cognitive impairment, communication barriers, time constraints and gaps in evidence. Effective SDM strategies include enhancing interdisciplinary collaboration, improving clinician and staff training, developing decision aids tailored to older adults considering surgery and leveraging technology to support patient engagement. Future efforts should focus on expanding SDM research, refining implementation frameworks and advocating for policy changes that facilitate patient-centred surgical decision-making in older adults. As the global population ages, prioritising SDM in peri-operative care will be critical to optimising patient outcomes, ensuring ethical, informed decision-making and aligning care plans with the patient's goals and values.

老年人围手术期共同决策:叙述性回顾。
由于身体虚弱、合并症和不同的个人优先事项,接受手术的老年人经常面临许多医疗保健决策的挑战。共同决策(SDM)是一种以患者为中心的方法,通过将医疗决策与个人价值观和偏好结合起来,增强围手术期护理。当考虑为老年人进行手术时,SDM可以确保手术治疗计划关注老年人认为重要的事情,如生活质量(QOL)、功能独立、长期健康和生存。这篇叙述性综述探讨了SDM在老年人围手术期护理中的作用以及在这种情况下提高SDM的策略。SDM促进患者、家属和医疗团队之间的协作;因此,它可以提高患者满意度,减少决策冲突,增强患者与医疗团队之间的信任。然而,由于认知障碍、沟通障碍、时间限制和证据不足,将SDM纳入日常实践仍然很复杂。有效的SDM策略包括加强跨学科合作,改善临床医生和员工培训,开发针对考虑手术的老年人的决策辅助工具,以及利用技术支持患者参与。未来的努力应集中在扩大SDM研究,完善实施框架和倡导政策变化,以促进老年人以患者为中心的手术决策。随着全球人口老龄化,在围手术期护理中优先考虑SDM对于优化患者结果、确保道德、明智的决策以及使护理计划与患者的目标和价值观保持一致至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信