Association of plasma biomarkers of lung injury with positive end expiratory pressure and postoperative pulmonary complications in obese surgical patients: A substudy of the PROBESE randomised controlled trial.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-20 DOI:10.1097/EJA.0000000000002221
Thomas Bluth, Eva Rivas, Manuel López-Baamonde, Josep Martí Sanahuja, Antonio López-Hernández, Jaume Balust, Toby N Weingarten, Felix Girrbach, Philipp Simon, Hermann Wrigge, Jakob Wittenstein, Katharina Birr, Robert Teichmann, Robert Huhle, Niklas Melchior, Luigi Vivona, Thea Koch, Harish Ramakrishna, Sorin Brull, Ary Serpa Neto, Marcus J Schultz, Juraj Sprung, Martin Scharffenberg, Marcelo Gama de Abreu
{"title":"Association of plasma biomarkers of lung injury with positive end expiratory pressure and postoperative pulmonary complications in obese surgical patients: A substudy of the PROBESE randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Thomas Bluth, Eva Rivas, Manuel López-Baamonde, Josep Martí Sanahuja, Antonio López-Hernández, Jaume Balust, Toby N Weingarten, Felix Girrbach, Philipp Simon, Hermann Wrigge, Jakob Wittenstein, Katharina Birr, Robert Teichmann, Robert Huhle, Niklas Melchior, Luigi Vivona, Thea Koch, Harish Ramakrishna, Sorin Brull, Ary Serpa Neto, Marcus J Schultz, Juraj Sprung, Martin Scharffenberg, Marcelo Gama de Abreu","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in obese patients remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test, whether intra-operative PEEP or PPCs are associated with plasma levels of biomarkers of lung injury.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective substudy of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (PROBESE).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Operating rooms of six tertiary care centres in the United States and Europe.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Obese patients at risk for PPCs undergoing abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Intra-operative low tidal volume ventilation with high PEEP (12 cmH 2 O) and recruitment manoeuvres, or low PEEP (4 cmH 2 O).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary endpoint was the association between absolute postoperative plasma levels of receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) and intra-operative PEEP; secondary endpoints included pre and postoperative plasma concentrations as well as the relative changes of interleukin-6, IL-8, tumour necrosis factor-α, surfactant protein D, mucin-1, clara cell protein-16, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule. PPCs were assessed as a 'collapsed composite' of adverse pulmonary events. The predictive ability of biomarkers for PPCs was assessed with the receiver operating curve-area under the curve (ROC-AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 96 patients received low PEEP, and 95 patients high PEEP. Postoperative plasma concentrations of RAGE and other biomarkers did not differ between groups. The relative increase of RAGE during surgery was more pronounced with low than high PEEP; median [IQR], 1.2 [1.0 to 1.6] vs. 1.1 [0.9 to 1.3], P  = 0.012. Patients who developed PPCs showed higher postoperative plasma levels and relative increase of IL-6; 26.3 [12.6 to 139.5] vs. 15.1 [3.7 to 38.7] fold change. The ROC-AUC was less than 0.7 for all biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this subgroup, choice of PEEP did not affect postoperative biomarkers of lung injury. Irrespective of PEEP, PPCs were associated with an increase in plasma levels of these biomarkers, but their predictive capability was poor.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02148692.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"840-850"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effect of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in obese patients remains controversial.

Objective: To test, whether intra-operative PEEP or PPCs are associated with plasma levels of biomarkers of lung injury.

Design: A prospective substudy of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (PROBESE).

Setting: Operating rooms of six tertiary care centres in the United States and Europe.

Patients: Obese patients at risk for PPCs undergoing abdominal surgery.

Intervention: Intra-operative low tidal volume ventilation with high PEEP (12 cmH 2 O) and recruitment manoeuvres, or low PEEP (4 cmH 2 O).

Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was the association between absolute postoperative plasma levels of receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) and intra-operative PEEP; secondary endpoints included pre and postoperative plasma concentrations as well as the relative changes of interleukin-6, IL-8, tumour necrosis factor-α, surfactant protein D, mucin-1, clara cell protein-16, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule. PPCs were assessed as a 'collapsed composite' of adverse pulmonary events. The predictive ability of biomarkers for PPCs was assessed with the receiver operating curve-area under the curve (ROC-AUC).

Results: A total of 96 patients received low PEEP, and 95 patients high PEEP. Postoperative plasma concentrations of RAGE and other biomarkers did not differ between groups. The relative increase of RAGE during surgery was more pronounced with low than high PEEP; median [IQR], 1.2 [1.0 to 1.6] vs. 1.1 [0.9 to 1.3], P  = 0.012. Patients who developed PPCs showed higher postoperative plasma levels and relative increase of IL-6; 26.3 [12.6 to 139.5] vs. 15.1 [3.7 to 38.7] fold change. The ROC-AUC was less than 0.7 for all biomarkers.

Conclusions: In this subgroup, choice of PEEP did not affect postoperative biomarkers of lung injury. Irrespective of PEEP, PPCs were associated with an increase in plasma levels of these biomarkers, but their predictive capability was poor.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT02148692.

肥胖手术患者肺损伤血浆生物标志物与呼气末正压和术后肺部并发症的关联:PROBESE随机对照试验的一项亚研究
背景:呼气末正压(PEEP)对肥胖患者术后肺部并发症(PPCs)的影响仍有争议。目的:探讨术中PEEP或PPCs与肺损伤生物标志物血浆水平的相关性。设计:多中心随机对照试验(PROBESE)的前瞻性亚研究。环境:美国和欧洲六个三级护理中心的手术室。患者:有腹部手术PPCs风险的肥胖患者。干预措施:术中低潮气量通气,高PEEP (12 cmH2O)和复位操作,或低PEEP (4 cmH2O)。主要结局指标:主要终点是术后晚期糖基化终末产物受体(RAGE)绝对血浆水平与术中PEEP之间的关系;次要终点包括术前和术后血浆浓度及白细胞介素-6、IL-8、肿瘤坏死因子-α、表面活性剂蛋白D、粘蛋白-1、clara细胞蛋白-16、细胞间粘附分子-1、血管细胞粘附分子的相对变化。PPCs被评估为不良肺部事件的“塌陷复合”。用受试者工作曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)评估生物标志物对PPCs的预测能力。结果:低PEEP 96例,高PEEP 95例。术后血浆RAGE及其他生物标志物浓度在两组间无差异。术中RAGE的相对升高在低PEEP比高PEEP时更为明显;中值(差),1.2(1.0 - 1.6)和1.1 (0.9 - 1.3),P = 0.012。发生PPCs的患者术后血浆水平较高,IL-6相对升高;26.3倍[12.6 ~ 139.5倍]比15.1倍[3.7 ~ 38.7倍]。所有生物标志物的ROC-AUC均小于0.7。结论:在这个亚组中,PEEP的选择不影响术后肺损伤的生物标志物。不考虑PEEP, PPCs与这些生物标志物的血浆水平升高相关,但其预测能力较差。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov,标识符:NCT02148692。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信