Meta-analysis reveals consistently positive effects of dementia caregiver interventions on psychological distress.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lian Lian, Erxun Li, Qinming Yu, Lili Huang, Yang Jin, Hongsheng Bian, Shuang Yu, Miao Yu
{"title":"Meta-analysis reveals consistently positive effects of dementia caregiver interventions on psychological distress.","authors":"Lian Lian, Erxun Li, Qinming Yu, Lili Huang, Yang Jin, Hongsheng Bian, Shuang Yu, Miao Yu","doi":"10.1159/000546707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>With the global increase in dementia due to demographic aging, dementia not only affects those diagnosed but also their primary caregivers, often leading to significant caregiver burden. This study aims to synthesize existing interventions to understand their effectiveness on reducing psychological distress-specifically anxiety, depression, and subjective well-being (SWB)-among dementia caregivers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a multi-level meta-analysis of 175 studies involving 342 intervention treatments on caregivers. Interventions were categorized into various psychological outcomes. The effects of demographic characteristics on intervention effectiveness were also analyzed using multi-level meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Interventions generally showed a significant reduction in anxiety and depression with varied effects on SWB. Training of the care recipient (CR) showed the largest observed effect on SWB, although this estimate is based on only 10 observations and should be regarded as promising rather than definitive. CBT also produced a robust positive effect. Younger, male, and non-spousal caregivers tended to experience greater reductions in anxiety and depression compared to older, female, or spousal caregivers.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to caregiver characteristics and outcome type. While interventions broadly reduce caregiver distress, the degree of benefit varies, indicating that personalized approaches may yield the best results. We also emphasize the need for rigorous methodology (e.g., handling non-independence and publication bias) in future caregiver intervention research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: With the global increase in dementia due to demographic aging, dementia not only affects those diagnosed but also their primary caregivers, often leading to significant caregiver burden. This study aims to synthesize existing interventions to understand their effectiveness on reducing psychological distress-specifically anxiety, depression, and subjective well-being (SWB)-among dementia caregivers.

Method: We conducted a multi-level meta-analysis of 175 studies involving 342 intervention treatments on caregivers. Interventions were categorized into various psychological outcomes. The effects of demographic characteristics on intervention effectiveness were also analyzed using multi-level meta-regression.

Main results: Interventions generally showed a significant reduction in anxiety and depression with varied effects on SWB. Training of the care recipient (CR) showed the largest observed effect on SWB, although this estimate is based on only 10 observations and should be regarded as promising rather than definitive. CBT also produced a robust positive effect. Younger, male, and non-spousal caregivers tended to experience greater reductions in anxiety and depression compared to older, female, or spousal caregivers.

Discussion and implications: These findings highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to caregiver characteristics and outcome type. While interventions broadly reduce caregiver distress, the degree of benefit varies, indicating that personalized approaches may yield the best results. We also emphasize the need for rigorous methodology (e.g., handling non-independence and publication bias) in future caregiver intervention research.

背景与目的:随着人口老龄化导致全球痴呆症患者增加,痴呆症不仅影响到确诊患者,也影响到他们的主要照顾者,往往导致严重的照顾者负担。本研究旨在综合现有的干预措施,以了解其在减少痴呆症护理人员心理困扰(特别是焦虑、抑郁和主观幸福感)方面的有效性。方法:我们对175项涉及342项护理人员干预治疗的研究进行了多层级meta分析。干预措施被分为不同的心理结果。人口统计学特征对干预效果的影响也采用多层次元回归分析。主要结果:干预措施普遍显示焦虑和抑郁的显著减少,对主观幸福感有不同的影响。接受护理者(CR)的培训对主观幸福感的影响最大,尽管这一估计仅基于10个观察结果,应该被视为有希望而不是确定的。CBT也产生了强有力的积极效果。与年龄较大、女性或配偶照顾者相比,年轻、男性和非配偶照顾者倾向于经历更大程度的焦虑和抑郁减少。讨论和启示:这些发现强调了根据照顾者特征和结果类型定制干预措施的重要性。虽然干预措施广泛地减少了照顾者的痛苦,但受益的程度各不相同,这表明个性化的方法可能会产生最好的结果。我们还强调在未来的护理干预研究中需要严格的方法(例如,处理非独立性和发表偏倚)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信