Performance of deep-learning models incorporating knee alignment information for predicting ground reaction force during walking.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Tommy Sugiarto, Yi-Jia Lin, Hsiao-Liang Tsai, Chi-Tien Sun, Wei-Chun Hsu
{"title":"Performance of deep-learning models incorporating knee alignment information for predicting ground reaction force during walking.","authors":"Tommy Sugiarto, Yi-Jia Lin, Hsiao-Liang Tsai, Chi-Tien Sun, Wei-Chun Hsu","doi":"10.1186/s12938-025-01409-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wearable sensors combined with deep-learning models are increasingly being used to predict biomechanical variables. Researchers have focused on either simple neural networks or complex pretrained models with multiple layers. In addition, studies have rarely integrated knee alignment information or the side affected by injury as features to improve model predictions. In this study, we compared the performance of selected model architectures, including complex pretrained models, in predicting three-dimensional (3D) ground reaction force (GRF) data during level walking by using data obtained from motion capture systems and wearable accelerometers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten deep-learning models for predicting the 3D GRF were developed using motion capture and accelerometer data with or without subject-specific features. Incorporating subject-specific features improved prediction accuracy for all models except the long short-term memory (LSTM) model. A two-dimensional (2D)-CNN-LSTM hybrid model achieved the best results. Established models, such as ResNet50 and Inception, performed better when trained with pretrained ImageNet weights and subject-specific features, underscoring the value of pretrained knowledge and subject-specific information for improving accuracy. However, these models did not outperform the custom hybrid models in predicting time-series 3D GRF data, indicating that larger models do not necessarily perform better for time-series applications but do always have greater computational demands.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating subject-specific features, such as alignment information, enhanced the accuracy of GRF predictions during walking. Complex pretrained models were outperformed by custom hybrid models for time-series 3D GRF prediction during walking. Custom models with lower computational demands and using alignment features are a more efficient and effective choice for applications requiring accurate and resource-efficient predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8927,"journal":{"name":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","volume":"24 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12186330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-025-01409-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Wearable sensors combined with deep-learning models are increasingly being used to predict biomechanical variables. Researchers have focused on either simple neural networks or complex pretrained models with multiple layers. In addition, studies have rarely integrated knee alignment information or the side affected by injury as features to improve model predictions. In this study, we compared the performance of selected model architectures, including complex pretrained models, in predicting three-dimensional (3D) ground reaction force (GRF) data during level walking by using data obtained from motion capture systems and wearable accelerometers.

Results: Ten deep-learning models for predicting the 3D GRF were developed using motion capture and accelerometer data with or without subject-specific features. Incorporating subject-specific features improved prediction accuracy for all models except the long short-term memory (LSTM) model. A two-dimensional (2D)-CNN-LSTM hybrid model achieved the best results. Established models, such as ResNet50 and Inception, performed better when trained with pretrained ImageNet weights and subject-specific features, underscoring the value of pretrained knowledge and subject-specific information for improving accuracy. However, these models did not outperform the custom hybrid models in predicting time-series 3D GRF data, indicating that larger models do not necessarily perform better for time-series applications but do always have greater computational demands.

Conclusion: Incorporating subject-specific features, such as alignment information, enhanced the accuracy of GRF predictions during walking. Complex pretrained models were outperformed by custom hybrid models for time-series 3D GRF prediction during walking. Custom models with lower computational demands and using alignment features are a more efficient and effective choice for applications requiring accurate and resource-efficient predictions.

结合膝关节对齐信息的深度学习模型的性能,用于预测行走过程中的地面反作用力。
背景:结合深度学习模型的可穿戴传感器越来越多地被用于预测生物力学变量。研究人员要么专注于简单的神经网络,要么专注于复杂的多层预训练模型。此外,研究很少将膝关节对齐信息或受损伤的一侧作为特征来改进模型预测。在这项研究中,我们比较了选择的模型架构的性能,包括复杂的预训练模型,通过使用从运动捕捉系统和可穿戴加速度计获得的数据来预测水平行走过程中的三维(3D)地面反作用力(GRF)数据。结果:利用运动捕捉和加速度计数据,开发了10个用于预测3D GRF的深度学习模型,这些模型有或没有受试者的特定特征。除长短期记忆(LSTM)模型外,结合特定主题的特征提高了所有模型的预测精度。二维(2D)-CNN-LSTM混合模型取得了最好的效果。已建立的模型,如ResNet50和Inception,在使用预训练的ImageNet权重和特定主题特征进行训练时表现更好,强调了预训练知识和特定主题信息对提高准确性的价值。然而,这些模型在预测时间序列3D GRF数据方面并没有优于自定义混合模型,这表明更大的模型并不一定在时间序列应用中表现更好,但总是有更大的计算需求。结论:结合受试者特定的特征,如对齐信息,提高了行走过程中GRF预测的准确性。自定义混合模型优于复杂预训练模型,可用于步行时的时间序列3D GRF预测。对于需要准确和资源高效预测的应用程序来说,具有较低计算需求和使用对齐特性的自定义模型是更高效和有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
BioMedical Engineering OnLine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
79
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BioMedical Engineering OnLine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that is dedicated to publishing research in all areas of biomedical engineering. BioMedical Engineering OnLine is aimed at readers and authors throughout the world, with an interest in using tools of the physical and data sciences and techniques in engineering to understand and solve problems in the biological and medical sciences. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: Bioinformatics- Bioinstrumentation- Biomechanics- Biomedical Devices & Instrumentation- Biomedical Signal Processing- Healthcare Information Systems- Human Dynamics- Neural Engineering- Rehabilitation Engineering- Biomaterials- Biomedical Imaging & Image Processing- BioMEMS and On-Chip Devices- Bio-Micro/Nano Technologies- Biomolecular Engineering- Biosensors- Cardiovascular Systems Engineering- Cellular Engineering- Clinical Engineering- Computational Biology- Drug Delivery Technologies- Modeling Methodologies- Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology in Biomedicine- Respiratory Systems Engineering- Robotics in Medicine- Systems and Synthetic Biology- Systems Biology- Telemedicine/Smartphone Applications in Medicine- Therapeutic Systems, Devices and Technologies- Tissue Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信