Health Technology Assessment and Environmental Impact: A Scoping Review of State of Art and Future Perspective.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Ippazio Cosimo Antonazzo, Giorgia Gribaudo, Lisa Ye, Pietro Ferrara, Lorenzo Losa, Paolo Abrate, Fabio Iraldo, Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani, Paolo Angelo Cortesi
{"title":"Health Technology Assessment and Environmental Impact: A Scoping Review of State of Art and Future Perspective.","authors":"Ippazio Cosimo Antonazzo, Giorgia Gribaudo, Lisa Ye, Pietro Ferrara, Lorenzo Losa, Paolo Abrate, Fabio Iraldo, Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani, Paolo Angelo Cortesi","doi":"10.1007/s40258-025-00984-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Manufacture, distribution, use, excretion, and disposal of health technologies all have environmental impacts (EIs). In the health technology assessment (HTA) definition, EI is recognized as a domain that should be assessed. However, EIs in HTA methods are lacking. The aim of this scoping review was to identify current advances and limitations in incorporating EI in HTA evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched two databases, PubMed and Embase (01/01/2019-20/10/2023, updated on 15/05/2025), using the following keywords: \"HTA\" and \"environmental impact.\" Articles published in English were included. Additionally, no filters by study design or type of evaluated technology were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 264 studies were screened after duplicates had been removed. Among them, 15 articles were included. Identified publications highlighted the necessity of robust and clear methods of EI assessment and its inclusion in the HTA process. Several authors have outlined the importance of assessing the EI of health technology throughout its life cycle, including raw materials, manufacturing, use, and disposal. However, the EI assessment in HTA presents significant challenges, such as determining a clear domain of EI, the perspective, and the time horizon for the assessment. EI assessment challenges also include the lack of disaggregated data on pollutant emissions and natural resource consumption, as well as recommendations on the use of the EI data by decision makers and HTA agencies. In the literature, different methods and approaches have been proposed to incorporate EI in HTA; some rely on already establish assessment methods (\"enriched\" cost-utility analysis, adjusted willingness to pay, and multicriteria decision analysis) and others proposed more specific approaches, such as \"information conduit,\" \"parallel evaluation,\" \"integrated evaluation,\" and \"environment-focused evaluation.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HTA framework needs adjustments to incorporate environmental information, including environmental healthcare technology impact. Clear and robust methods on EI assessment and inclusion in the HTA process should be provided by HTA agencies and international societies. Further, manufacturers should improve the data generation on the EI of their products, with new studies able to generate individual-level data on environmental technology impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":8065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Health Economics and Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-025-00984-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Manufacture, distribution, use, excretion, and disposal of health technologies all have environmental impacts (EIs). In the health technology assessment (HTA) definition, EI is recognized as a domain that should be assessed. However, EIs in HTA methods are lacking. The aim of this scoping review was to identify current advances and limitations in incorporating EI in HTA evaluation.

Methods: We searched two databases, PubMed and Embase (01/01/2019-20/10/2023, updated on 15/05/2025), using the following keywords: "HTA" and "environmental impact." Articles published in English were included. Additionally, no filters by study design or type of evaluated technology were used.

Results: In total, 264 studies were screened after duplicates had been removed. Among them, 15 articles were included. Identified publications highlighted the necessity of robust and clear methods of EI assessment and its inclusion in the HTA process. Several authors have outlined the importance of assessing the EI of health technology throughout its life cycle, including raw materials, manufacturing, use, and disposal. However, the EI assessment in HTA presents significant challenges, such as determining a clear domain of EI, the perspective, and the time horizon for the assessment. EI assessment challenges also include the lack of disaggregated data on pollutant emissions and natural resource consumption, as well as recommendations on the use of the EI data by decision makers and HTA agencies. In the literature, different methods and approaches have been proposed to incorporate EI in HTA; some rely on already establish assessment methods ("enriched" cost-utility analysis, adjusted willingness to pay, and multicriteria decision analysis) and others proposed more specific approaches, such as "information conduit," "parallel evaluation," "integrated evaluation," and "environment-focused evaluation."

Conclusion: HTA framework needs adjustments to incorporate environmental information, including environmental healthcare technology impact. Clear and robust methods on EI assessment and inclusion in the HTA process should be provided by HTA agencies and international societies. Further, manufacturers should improve the data generation on the EI of their products, with new studies able to generate individual-level data on environmental technology impact.

卫生技术的制造、分销、使用、排泄和处置都具有环境影响(ei)。在卫生技术评估(HTA)定义中,EI被认为是一个需要评估的领域。然而,在HTA方法中缺乏ei。本综述的目的是确定将EI纳入HTA评价的当前进展和局限性。方法:检索PubMed和Embase两个数据库(2019年1月1日- 2023年10月20日,更新日期为2025年5月15日),检索关键词为“HTA”和“环境影响”。以英文发表的文章也包括在内。此外,没有使用研究设计或评估技术类型的过滤器。结果:去除重复后,共筛选264项研究。其中收录了15篇文章。已确定的出版物强调了健全和明确的EI评估方法的必要性,并将其纳入HTA进程。几位作者概述了评估卫生技术在其整个生命周期(包括原材料、制造、使用和处置)的EI的重要性。然而,HTA中的EI评估面临着重大挑战,例如确定明确的EI领域,评估的视角和时间范围。EI评估的挑战还包括缺乏污染物排放和自然资源消耗的分类数据,以及决策者和HTA机构使用EI数据的建议。在文献中,已经提出了不同的方法和途径将EI纳入HTA;一些依靠已经建立的评估方法(“丰富的”成本效用分析、调整的支付意愿和多标准决策分析),另一些则提出了更具体的方法,如“信息渠道”、“平行评价”、“综合评价”和“以环境为重点的评价”。结论:HTA框架需要调整以纳入环境信息,包括环境卫生技术的影响。HTA机构和国际社会应提供关于EI评估和纳入HTA过程的明确而有力的方法。此外,制造商应改进其产品环境影响指数的数据生成,开展能够生成个人层面的环境技术影响数据的新研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy provides timely publication of cutting-edge research and expert opinion from this increasingly important field, making it a vital resource for payers, providers and researchers alike. The journal includes high quality economic research and reviews of all aspects of healthcare from various perspectives and countries, designed to communicate the latest applied information in health economics and health policy. While emphasis is placed on information with practical applications, a strong basis of underlying scientific rigor is maintained.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信