Upper Limb Movement Performance in Individuals Sustaining Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries.

IF 1.8 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Sandeep K Subramanian, Ely Ann Gonzalez, Lucero Villalpando, Mitzi D Chavez, Darrian S Mezulic, Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez
{"title":"Upper Limb Movement Performance in Individuals Sustaining Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries.","authors":"Sandeep K Subramanian, Ely Ann Gonzalez, Lucero Villalpando, Mitzi D Chavez, Darrian S Mezulic, Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez","doi":"10.1177/09727531251341097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals sustaining a mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) continue to have suboptimal upper limb (UL) involvement in daily life. Intensity of task practice is one key factor to promote better motor improvement. Task-practice intensity metrics include number of repetitions/sessions, and this value is currently unknown in people with mild TBI. Kinematic analysis can help estimate the number of repetitions/sessions.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We estimated the minimal number of repetitions for a plateau in performance in an UL pointing task in 10 individuals who had sustained a mild TBI and seven age-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All participants performed 45 repetitions and pointed to a central target at arm's length. The TBI group underwent assessments of UL motor impairment, spasticity and activity limitations. The primary outcome was the number of trials to achieve an asymptote in endpoint error. Secondary outcomes included movement speed, straightness, trunk and UL joint ranges of motion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical assessments revealed absence of motor impairment or activity limitations. However, individuals with mild TBI required more trials (28.5) to reach an asymptote in the pointing movement performance compared to controls (18; <i>p</i> = .005, effect size [ES] = -0.66). They also had more curved movements (1.11 ± 0.06 vs 1.06 ± 0.01; <i>p</i> = .036, ES = 0.64), used more trunk displacement (13.1 ± 3 vs 10.2 ± 2.1 mm; <i>p</i> = .044, ES = 1.09) and had lower ranges of motion in wrist extension (24.8 ± 3.8 vs 17.3 ± 3.4; <i>p</i> = .006, ES = 1.60), elbow extension (144.7 ± 6.8 vs 152.3 ± 6.8°, <i>p</i> = .025, ES = 1.22), shoulder flexion (60.5 ± 5.2 vs 66.6 ± 6.4, <i>p</i> = .046, ES = 1.07) and shoulder horizontal adduction (77.7 ± 5.0 vs 87.4 ± 9.6, <i>p</i> = .014, ES = 1.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After sustaining a mild TBI, individuals have deficient UL movement performance. Use of kinematic analyses can help uncover latent deficits in those with perfect scores on clinical assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7921,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"09727531251341097"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12176803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531251341097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals sustaining a mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) continue to have suboptimal upper limb (UL) involvement in daily life. Intensity of task practice is one key factor to promote better motor improvement. Task-practice intensity metrics include number of repetitions/sessions, and this value is currently unknown in people with mild TBI. Kinematic analysis can help estimate the number of repetitions/sessions.

Purpose: We estimated the minimal number of repetitions for a plateau in performance in an UL pointing task in 10 individuals who had sustained a mild TBI and seven age-matched controls.

Methods: All participants performed 45 repetitions and pointed to a central target at arm's length. The TBI group underwent assessments of UL motor impairment, spasticity and activity limitations. The primary outcome was the number of trials to achieve an asymptote in endpoint error. Secondary outcomes included movement speed, straightness, trunk and UL joint ranges of motion.

Results: Clinical assessments revealed absence of motor impairment or activity limitations. However, individuals with mild TBI required more trials (28.5) to reach an asymptote in the pointing movement performance compared to controls (18; p = .005, effect size [ES] = -0.66). They also had more curved movements (1.11 ± 0.06 vs 1.06 ± 0.01; p = .036, ES = 0.64), used more trunk displacement (13.1 ± 3 vs 10.2 ± 2.1 mm; p = .044, ES = 1.09) and had lower ranges of motion in wrist extension (24.8 ± 3.8 vs 17.3 ± 3.4; p = .006, ES = 1.60), elbow extension (144.7 ± 6.8 vs 152.3 ± 6.8°, p = .025, ES = 1.22), shoulder flexion (60.5 ± 5.2 vs 66.6 ± 6.4, p = .046, ES = 1.07) and shoulder horizontal adduction (77.7 ± 5.0 vs 87.4 ± 9.6, p = .014, ES = 1.35).

Conclusion: After sustaining a mild TBI, individuals have deficient UL movement performance. Use of kinematic analyses can help uncover latent deficits in those with perfect scores on clinical assessments.

轻度创伤性脑损伤个体的上肢运动表现。
背景:遭受轻度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的个体在日常生活中上肢(UL)的参与程度仍然不理想。任务练习的强度是促进运动能力提高的关键因素之一。任务练习强度指标包括重复次数/会话次数,目前在轻度TBI患者中该值尚不清楚。运动学分析可以帮助估计重复/会话的数量。目的:我们估计了10名轻度TBI患者和7名年龄匹配的对照者在UL指向任务中表现平稳的最小重复次数。方法:所有参与者都做了45次重复,并指向一个手臂长度的中心目标。脑外伤组进行UL运动损伤、痉挛和活动限制的评估。主要结局是达到终点误差渐近线的试验次数。次要结果包括运动速度、直线度、躯干和UL关节活动范围。结果:临床评估显示没有运动障碍或活动限制。然而,与对照组相比,轻度TBI患者需要更多的试验(28.5)才能在指向运动表现上达到渐近线(18;p = 0.005,效应量[ES] = -0.66)。他们也有更多的弯曲运动(1.11±0.06 vs 1.06±0.01;p = 0.036, ES = 0.64),使用较多躯干位移(13.1±3 vs 10.2±2.1 mm;p = 0.044, ES = 1.09),且腕部伸展活动范围较低(24.8±3.8 vs 17.3±3.4;p = 0.006, ES = 1.60),肘关节伸直(144.7±6.8°vs 152.3±6.8°,p = 0.025, ES = 1.22),肩关节屈曲(60.5±5.2 vs 66.6±6.4,p = 0.046, ES = 1.07)和肩关节水平内收(77.7±5.0 vs 87.4±9.6,p = 0.014, ES = 1.35)。结论:轻度脑外伤后,个体的UL运动能力不足。使用运动学分析可以帮助发现那些在临床评估中得分完美的潜在缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Neurosciences
Annals of Neurosciences NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信