End-of-life dementia care: a qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of minority ethnic and economically disadvantaged groups.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Louise Tomkow, Marie Poole, Efioanwan Damisa, Barbara Hanratty, Faith Tissa, Malcolm Ngouala, Josie Dixon, Maria Karagiannidou, Margaret Ogden, Felicity Dewhurst
{"title":"End-of-life dementia care: a qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of minority ethnic and economically disadvantaged groups.","authors":"Louise Tomkow, Marie Poole, Efioanwan Damisa, Barbara Hanratty, Faith Tissa, Malcolm Ngouala, Josie Dixon, Maria Karagiannidou, Margaret Ogden, Felicity Dewhurst","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality amongst ageing populations. However, palliative care is often poor or non-existent. People from minority ethnic and economically disadvantaged communities are especially likely to miss out. Research exploring how inclusive end-of-life (EOL) care should be provided for people living with dementia (PLWD) is limited and commonly fails to include sufficient representation of people from minority ethnic groups and those living in poverty.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Our aim was to understand the experiences and perceptions of EOL dementia care amongst underserved groups and investigate how ethnicity and socioeconomic status influence experiences and perceptions of EOL dementia care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten workshops were held with a total of 29 Experts-by-Experience (EbE). All had professional and/or personal experience of care for people from disadvantaged groups living with dementia in England. The groups explored (i) current evidence gaps, (ii) barriers and facilitators to EOL care for PLWD across different ethnic and socioeconomic groups and (iii) recommendations for care and future research. The discussions were recorded, transcribed and the qualitative data analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data point to cultural, socioeconomic and systemic barriers to accessing quality EOL care for PLWD. EbE described how there is fear and stigma of talking about dementia and EOL care, and a mistrust of health and care services. Financial concerns were pervasive throughout the data and were described by EbE as significant drivers of inequalities in access to quality care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EbE from minority ethnic and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups report poor experiences of EOL dementia care. Our data suggests there is a need to improve multiple aspects of care, including access and coordination. Future research should work with underserved communities to co-produce culturally sensitive interventions to address inequalities in dementia EOL care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dementia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality amongst ageing populations. However, palliative care is often poor or non-existent. People from minority ethnic and economically disadvantaged communities are especially likely to miss out. Research exploring how inclusive end-of-life (EOL) care should be provided for people living with dementia (PLWD) is limited and commonly fails to include sufficient representation of people from minority ethnic groups and those living in poverty.

Aims: Our aim was to understand the experiences and perceptions of EOL dementia care amongst underserved groups and investigate how ethnicity and socioeconomic status influence experiences and perceptions of EOL dementia care.

Methods: Ten workshops were held with a total of 29 Experts-by-Experience (EbE). All had professional and/or personal experience of care for people from disadvantaged groups living with dementia in England. The groups explored (i) current evidence gaps, (ii) barriers and facilitators to EOL care for PLWD across different ethnic and socioeconomic groups and (iii) recommendations for care and future research. The discussions were recorded, transcribed and the qualitative data analysed thematically.

Results: Data point to cultural, socioeconomic and systemic barriers to accessing quality EOL care for PLWD. EbE described how there is fear and stigma of talking about dementia and EOL care, and a mistrust of health and care services. Financial concerns were pervasive throughout the data and were described by EbE as significant drivers of inequalities in access to quality care.

Conclusion: EbE from minority ethnic and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups report poor experiences of EOL dementia care. Our data suggests there is a need to improve multiple aspects of care, including access and coordination. Future research should work with underserved communities to co-produce culturally sensitive interventions to address inequalities in dementia EOL care.

临终痴呆护理:少数民族和经济弱势群体的经验和看法的定性研究。
背景:老年痴呆症是老年人群发病和死亡的主要原因。然而,姑息治疗往往很差或根本不存在。来自少数民族和经济弱势社区的人尤其有可能被遗漏。探索如何为痴呆症患者提供包容性临终关怀(EOL)的研究是有限的,而且通常没有包括少数民族和贫困人口的足够代表。目的:我们的目的是了解服务不足群体对EOL痴呆护理的经历和看法,并调查种族和社会经济地位如何影响EOL痴呆护理的经历和看法。方法:共举办10场工作坊,29名经验专家(EbE)参加。所有人都有专业和/或个人经验,照顾英国患有痴呆症的弱势群体。这些小组探讨了(i)目前的证据差距,(ii)不同种族和社会经济群体对PLWD的EOL护理的障碍和促进因素,以及(iii)护理和未来研究的建议。对讨论进行了记录、转录,并对定性数据进行了专题分析。结果:数据表明,文化、社会经济和系统性障碍阻碍了PLWD患者获得高质量的EOL护理。EbE描述了人们如何对谈论痴呆症和老年护理感到恐惧和耻辱,以及对卫生和护理服务的不信任。财务问题在整个数据中普遍存在,EbE将其描述为获得高质量医疗服务不平等的重要驱动因素。结论:来自少数民族和社会经济弱势群体的EbE报告了较差的EOL痴呆护理经验。我们的数据表明,需要改善护理的多个方面,包括获取和协调。未来的研究应与服务不足的社区合作,共同制定具有文化敏感性的干预措施,以解决痴呆症EOL护理中的不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信