Pilot Results of Masibambisane: Couples Motivational Interviewing with Mobile Breathalyzers to Address Unhealthy Drinking and Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in South Africa.

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Amy A Conroy, Rita M Butterfield, Buyisile Chibi, Judith A Hahn, Torsten B Neilands, Lindani Msimango, Alastair van Heerden, Hilton Humphries, Tyrel J Starks
{"title":"Pilot Results of Masibambisane: Couples Motivational Interviewing with Mobile Breathalyzers to Address Unhealthy Drinking and Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in South Africa.","authors":"Amy A Conroy, Rita M Butterfield, Buyisile Chibi, Judith A Hahn, Torsten B Neilands, Lindani Msimango, Alastair van Heerden, Hilton Humphries, Tyrel J Starks","doi":"10.1007/s10461-025-04804-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of couples motivational interviewing (MI) with and without mobile breathalyzers (Masibambisane) to reduce unhealthy alcohol use among couples with HIV in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Ninety couples were randomized to couples MI with breathalyzers (MI-plus), couples MI without breathalyzers (MI-only), or enhanced usual care (EUC). Eligible couples had at least one partner on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with a positive AUDIT-C screen. Primary outcomes included retention, session attendance, breathalyzer completion, and satisfaction rates. Exploratory outcomes were unhealthy alcohol use (i.e., positive AUDIT-C screen and/or phosphatidylethanol [PEth] ≥ 35 ng/ml), number of drinking days in past month, AUDIT-C score, optimal adherence to ART (95% or higher), and viral suppression. Retention and attendance rates were 97.7% and 83.3% at 6-months. Breathalyzer completion was limited (58.2%) due to cellular and power challenges. Satisfaction exceeded 94.8%. MI-only and MI-plus arms had larger declines in drinking days and AUDIT-C score and larger increases in ART adherence vs. EUC. We observed no differences in biomarker-confirmed unhealthy alcohol use, which remained high across all arms at two months (94.6%, 96.5%, and 100%) for EUC, MI-only, and MI-plus. Viral suppression rates were 86.7%, 96.5%, and 86.2% for EUC, MI-only, and MI-plus. Between-arm differences for outcomes were non-significant; however, moderation analysis revealed that MI-only (p < 0.001) and MI-plus (p < 0.016) significantly reduced AUDIT-C scores for those with severe drinking (AUDIT-C > 7). Masibambisane was highly feasible and acceptable. Results provide initial evidence of couples MI with breathalyzers to reduce alcohol use among those with very high-risk drinking.</p>","PeriodicalId":7543,"journal":{"name":"AIDS and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDS and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-025-04804-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of couples motivational interviewing (MI) with and without mobile breathalyzers (Masibambisane) to reduce unhealthy alcohol use among couples with HIV in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Ninety couples were randomized to couples MI with breathalyzers (MI-plus), couples MI without breathalyzers (MI-only), or enhanced usual care (EUC). Eligible couples had at least one partner on antiretroviral therapy (ART) with a positive AUDIT-C screen. Primary outcomes included retention, session attendance, breathalyzer completion, and satisfaction rates. Exploratory outcomes were unhealthy alcohol use (i.e., positive AUDIT-C screen and/or phosphatidylethanol [PEth] ≥ 35 ng/ml), number of drinking days in past month, AUDIT-C score, optimal adherence to ART (95% or higher), and viral suppression. Retention and attendance rates were 97.7% and 83.3% at 6-months. Breathalyzer completion was limited (58.2%) due to cellular and power challenges. Satisfaction exceeded 94.8%. MI-only and MI-plus arms had larger declines in drinking days and AUDIT-C score and larger increases in ART adherence vs. EUC. We observed no differences in biomarker-confirmed unhealthy alcohol use, which remained high across all arms at two months (94.6%, 96.5%, and 100%) for EUC, MI-only, and MI-plus. Viral suppression rates were 86.7%, 96.5%, and 86.2% for EUC, MI-only, and MI-plus. Between-arm differences for outcomes were non-significant; however, moderation analysis revealed that MI-only (p < 0.001) and MI-plus (p < 0.016) significantly reduced AUDIT-C scores for those with severe drinking (AUDIT-C > 7). Masibambisane was highly feasible and acceptable. Results provide initial evidence of couples MI with breathalyzers to reduce alcohol use among those with very high-risk drinking.

Masibambisane的试点结果:在南非用移动酒精测试仪对不健康饮酒和坚持抗逆转录病毒治疗的夫妇进行动机性访谈。
在南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省,我们评估了夫妻动机访谈(MI)在使用和不使用移动呼气测醉器(Masibambisane)的情况下减少艾滋病毒感染夫妇不健康饮酒的可行性、可接受性和初步效果。90对夫妇被随机分为有呼吸测醉器的夫妇(MI +)、没有呼吸测醉器的夫妇(MI +)或强化常规护理(EUC)。符合条件的夫妇至少有一方接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART),审计- c筛查呈阳性。主要结果包括保留率、会话出勤率、酒精测试完成率和满意度。探索性结果为不健康饮酒(即AUDIT-C筛查阳性和/或磷脂酰乙醇[PEth]≥35 ng/ml)、过去一个月饮酒天数、AUDIT-C评分、ART的最佳依从性(95%或更高)和病毒抑制。6个月时留校率和出勤率分别为97.7%和83.3%。由于蜂窝和电源问题,呼气分析仪的完成度有限(58.2%)。满意度超过94.8%。与EUC相比,仅mi组和mi +组的饮酒天数和AUDIT-C评分下降幅度更大,ART依从性增加幅度更大。我们观察到生物标志物证实的不健康酒精使用没有差异,在所有组中,EUC, MI-only和MI-plus在两个月时仍然很高(94.6%,96.5%和100%)。EUC、MI-only和MI-plus的病毒抑制率分别为86.7%、96.5%和86.2%。结果的组间差异不显著;然而,适度分析显示只有mi (p 7)。Masibambisane是高度可行和可接受的。研究结果提供了初步证据,证明使用呼吸测醉器的夫妇可以减少高危饮酒人群的酒精使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIDS and Behavior
AIDS and Behavior Multiple-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
382
期刊介绍: AIDS and Behavior provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews. provides an international venue for the scientific exchange of research and scholarly work on the contributing factors, prevention, consequences, social impact, and response to HIV/AIDS. This bimonthly journal publishes original peer-reviewed papers that address all areas of AIDS behavioral research including: individual, contextual, social, economic and geographic factors that facilitate HIV transmission; interventions aimed to reduce HIV transmission risks at all levels and in all contexts; mental health aspects of HIV/AIDS; medical and behavioral consequences of HIV infection - including health-related quality of life, coping, treatment and treatment adherence; and the impact of HIV infection on adults children, families, communities and societies. The journal publishes original research articles, brief research reports, and critical literature reviews.5 Year Impact Factor: 2.965 (2008) Section ''SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL'': Rank 5 of 29 Section ''PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH'': Rank 9 of 76
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信