Differences in Brain Oscillation Patterns During Motor-Related Sensory Imagery Creation and Recall

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Dariusz Zapała, Paweł Augustynowicz, Paulina Droździel, Paulina Iwanowicz
{"title":"Differences in Brain Oscillation Patterns During Motor-Related Sensory Imagery Creation and Recall","authors":"Dariusz Zapała,&nbsp;Paweł Augustynowicz,&nbsp;Paulina Droździel,&nbsp;Paulina Iwanowicz","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Motor imagery (MI) engages higher cognitive functions such as memory, attention, and the transformation of sensory information in various ways, depending on the current goal. MI can be used to reproduce in the mind a possibly exact copy of an earlier motor experience (isomorphic motor imagery [IMI]) or to transform earlier experiences into new mental representations (transmorphic motor imagery [TMI]). Our study aimed to identify electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns of brain oscillations that can distinguish these two types of MI focused on differences in the frontal midline theta (FMΘ), central parietal beta (CPβ), and sensorimotor rhythms (SMR). Twenty subjects (14F; 18–25 years) participated in the study. Experimental stimuli were generated using a haptic interface to stimulate force feedback during hand clamping. The subjects had to squeeze the interface handle, memorizing the sensations associated with this movement. Then, they mentally reproduced the action they had just performed (IMI) or imagined stronger/weaker sensations (TMI). The study findings demonstrate significant differences in FMΘ and CPβ oscillation activity when comparing IMI and TMI. The IMI condition exhibits similar brain rhythm activity to working memory, probably due to its function of reproducing a previous motor experience. In contrast, oscillation patterns during TMI resemble introspective activity typical of multimodal sensory transformations. Additionally, we observed differences in the parietal delta and theta, in line with prior research on actual movement. Results may suggest that controlling movement kinematic parameters is critical when MI replicates sensory experiences, whereas creating new representations from experiences may require less stringent control.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"61 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) engages higher cognitive functions such as memory, attention, and the transformation of sensory information in various ways, depending on the current goal. MI can be used to reproduce in the mind a possibly exact copy of an earlier motor experience (isomorphic motor imagery [IMI]) or to transform earlier experiences into new mental representations (transmorphic motor imagery [TMI]). Our study aimed to identify electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns of brain oscillations that can distinguish these two types of MI focused on differences in the frontal midline theta (FMΘ), central parietal beta (CPβ), and sensorimotor rhythms (SMR). Twenty subjects (14F; 18–25 years) participated in the study. Experimental stimuli were generated using a haptic interface to stimulate force feedback during hand clamping. The subjects had to squeeze the interface handle, memorizing the sensations associated with this movement. Then, they mentally reproduced the action they had just performed (IMI) or imagined stronger/weaker sensations (TMI). The study findings demonstrate significant differences in FMΘ and CPβ oscillation activity when comparing IMI and TMI. The IMI condition exhibits similar brain rhythm activity to working memory, probably due to its function of reproducing a previous motor experience. In contrast, oscillation patterns during TMI resemble introspective activity typical of multimodal sensory transformations. Additionally, we observed differences in the parietal delta and theta, in line with prior research on actual movement. Results may suggest that controlling movement kinematic parameters is critical when MI replicates sensory experiences, whereas creating new representations from experiences may require less stringent control.

Abstract Image

运动相关感觉意象创造和回忆过程中脑振荡模式的差异
运动意象(MI)涉及更高的认知功能,如记忆,注意,以及根据当前目标以各种方式转换感觉信息。MI可用于在大脑中复制早期运动体验的可能精确副本(同构运动意象[IMI])或将早期经验转化为新的心理表征(变形运动意象[TMI])。我们的研究旨在确定脑电图(EEG)模式,以区分这两种类型的心肌梗死,重点关注额叶中线θ (FMΘ)、中央顶叶β (CPβ)和感觉运动节律(SMR)的差异。20名受试者(14F;18-25岁)参加了这项研究。实验刺激产生使用触觉界面,以刺激力反馈在手夹。受试者必须挤压界面手柄,记住与这个动作相关的感觉。然后,他们在脑海中重现他们刚刚完成的动作(IMI)或想象更强/更弱的感觉(TMI)。研究结果表明,IMI和TMI在FMΘ和CPβ振荡活性方面存在显著差异。IMI表现出与工作记忆相似的脑节律活动,可能是由于其再现先前运动体验的功能。相反,TMI期间的振荡模式类似于典型的多模态感觉转换的内省活动。此外,我们观察到顶叶delta和theta的差异,这与之前对实际运动的研究一致。结果可能表明,当MI复制感官体验时,控制运动运动学参数是至关重要的,而从经验中创建新的表征可能不需要那么严格的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Neuroscience
European Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
305
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信