Evaluation of Modular Polycarbonate Solar Dryers for Coffee: Technical Performance and Economic Feasibility

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Eduardo Duque-Dussán, Juan R. Sanz-Uribe, César A. Ramírez-Gómez
{"title":"Evaluation of Modular Polycarbonate Solar Dryers for Coffee: Technical Performance and Economic Feasibility","authors":"Eduardo Duque-Dussán,&nbsp;Juan R. Sanz-Uribe,&nbsp;César A. Ramírez-Gómez","doi":"10.1111/jfpe.70165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Solar drying is the most common method for drying parchment coffee on smallholder farms due to its low cost. However, traditional dryers often suffer from long drying times, moisture reabsorption, and material degradation, which can reduce coffee quality. This study evaluates two modular, self-supporting solar dryers covered with polycarbonate sheets, one solid (3 mm) and one alveolar (6 mm), compared to a traditional control dryer covered with Prosolar 140 g/m<sup>2</sup> plastic fabric. Trials were conducted in Gigante and San Agustín, Huila, Colombia, measuring drying time, environmental conditions, and sensory quality. Both polycarbonate dryers included an automated ventilation system and a retractable curtain to improve moisture control. The solid polycarbonate dryer reduced drying time by up to 47.8% and maintained the highest internal temperatures. The alveolar dryer reduced drying time by 43.2% and showed slightly better uniformity in sensory scores. Despite the accelerated drying, cup quality was preserved, with no typical defects linked to rapid or uneven drying. The ventilation system maintained low humidity levels, and no nighttime moisture reabsorption was observed, unlike in the control dryer. Economic analysis showed that while the polycarbonate dryers had higher initial costs, they offered better long-term returns due to greater drying capacity and lower maintenance. These systems processed more coffee per cycle and had longer service lives, improving overall profitability. Polycarbonate-based drying systems present an efficient, scalable, and sustainable alternative for coffee producers, particularly in regions with variable climates. They reduce drying time, preserve product quality, and enhance economic feasibility.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","volume":"48 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.70165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solar drying is the most common method for drying parchment coffee on smallholder farms due to its low cost. However, traditional dryers often suffer from long drying times, moisture reabsorption, and material degradation, which can reduce coffee quality. This study evaluates two modular, self-supporting solar dryers covered with polycarbonate sheets, one solid (3 mm) and one alveolar (6 mm), compared to a traditional control dryer covered with Prosolar 140 g/m2 plastic fabric. Trials were conducted in Gigante and San Agustín, Huila, Colombia, measuring drying time, environmental conditions, and sensory quality. Both polycarbonate dryers included an automated ventilation system and a retractable curtain to improve moisture control. The solid polycarbonate dryer reduced drying time by up to 47.8% and maintained the highest internal temperatures. The alveolar dryer reduced drying time by 43.2% and showed slightly better uniformity in sensory scores. Despite the accelerated drying, cup quality was preserved, with no typical defects linked to rapid or uneven drying. The ventilation system maintained low humidity levels, and no nighttime moisture reabsorption was observed, unlike in the control dryer. Economic analysis showed that while the polycarbonate dryers had higher initial costs, they offered better long-term returns due to greater drying capacity and lower maintenance. These systems processed more coffee per cycle and had longer service lives, improving overall profitability. Polycarbonate-based drying systems present an efficient, scalable, and sustainable alternative for coffee producers, particularly in regions with variable climates. They reduce drying time, preserve product quality, and enhance economic feasibility.

模块化聚碳酸酯太阳能咖啡烘干机的技术性能和经济可行性评价
由于成本低,太阳能干燥是小农农场最常用的干燥羊皮纸咖啡的方法。然而,传统的干燥机往往存在干燥时间长、水分重吸收和材料降解的问题,这些都会降低咖啡的质量。这项研究评估了两种模块化的、自支撑的太阳能干燥器,其中一种是聚碳酸酯片,一种是固体(3毫米),另一种是槽状(6毫米),与传统的控制干燥器相比,这种干燥器覆盖了Prosolar 140克/平方米的塑料织物。试验在哥伦比亚Huila的Gigante和San Agustín进行,测量干燥时间、环境条件和感官质量。这两款聚碳酸酯干燥机都包括一个自动通风系统和一个可伸缩的窗帘,以改善湿度控制。固体聚碳酸酯干燥器减少了47.8%的干燥时间,并保持了最高的内部温度。肺泡式干燥机减少了43.2%的干燥时间,在感官评分上表现出稍好的均匀性。尽管加速干燥,杯子的质量被保留,没有典型的缺陷与快速或不均匀干燥。通风系统保持低湿度水平,没有观察到夜间水分再吸收,不像在控制干燥机。经济分析表明,虽然聚碳酸酯干燥机的初始成本较高,但由于干燥能力更强,维护成本更低,因此可以提供更好的长期回报。这些系统每次循环处理更多的咖啡,使用寿命更长,提高了整体盈利能力。以聚碳酸酯为基础的干燥系统为咖啡生产商提供了一种高效、可扩展和可持续的替代方案,特别是在气候多变的地区。它们减少干燥时间,保持产品质量,并提高经济可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Journal of Food Process Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
259
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: This international research journal focuses on the engineering aspects of post-production handling, storage, processing, packaging, and distribution of food. Read by researchers, food and chemical engineers, and industry experts, this is the only international journal specifically devoted to the engineering aspects of food processing. Co-Editors M. Elena Castell-Perez and Rosana Moreira, both of Texas A&M University, welcome papers covering the best original research on applications of engineering principles and concepts to food and food processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信