How to make schools more inclusive for children and young people with special education needs/disabilities: A deliberative democratic approach

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Brahm Norwich
{"title":"How to make schools more inclusive for children and young people with special education needs/disabilities: A deliberative democratic approach","authors":"Brahm Norwich","doi":"10.1111/1467-8578.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article starts by reviewing the position that inclusion is a contested and difficult term to define and that there have been no attempts to link the policy challenges of inclusive education with the issues of democratic policymaking. The article then summarises contemporary ideas and practices about deliberative approaches to policymaking and politics (deliberative democratic approaches). This provides the context for an overview of a citizens' panel project that aimed to (i) obtain information about modifying a citizens' panel process to enhance the participation of young people with special educational needs and disabilities and (ii) generate more nuanced, grounded and integrated policy ideas about inclusion than can be found in recent English education policy. The organisation of the citizens' panel is then presented. It was planned as a two-stage process comprising a panel of young people with and without special educational needs and disabilities, their parents and education professionals. The panel was evaluated through interviews. The results show the importance of meticulously preparing a differentiated and strengths-based approach to running the panel. Almost all of the ideas about improving school inclusion were general school changes for all pupils, with some aspects pertinent to special educational needs and disabilities. The significance of the project is discussed in terms of preparing all young people for participation in democratic processes as a basic aspect of democratic citizenship.</p>","PeriodicalId":46054,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Special Education","volume":"52 2","pages":"234-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-8578.70010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://nasenjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.70010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article starts by reviewing the position that inclusion is a contested and difficult term to define and that there have been no attempts to link the policy challenges of inclusive education with the issues of democratic policymaking. The article then summarises contemporary ideas and practices about deliberative approaches to policymaking and politics (deliberative democratic approaches). This provides the context for an overview of a citizens' panel project that aimed to (i) obtain information about modifying a citizens' panel process to enhance the participation of young people with special educational needs and disabilities and (ii) generate more nuanced, grounded and integrated policy ideas about inclusion than can be found in recent English education policy. The organisation of the citizens' panel is then presented. It was planned as a two-stage process comprising a panel of young people with and without special educational needs and disabilities, their parents and education professionals. The panel was evaluated through interviews. The results show the importance of meticulously preparing a differentiated and strengths-based approach to running the panel. Almost all of the ideas about improving school inclusion were general school changes for all pupils, with some aspects pertinent to special educational needs and disabilities. The significance of the project is discussed in terms of preparing all young people for participation in democratic processes as a basic aspect of democratic citizenship.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

如何让学校对有特殊教育需要/残疾的儿童和青少年更具包容性:协商民主的方法
本文首先回顾了包容性是一个有争议且难以定义的术语的立场,并且没有尝试将包容性教育的政策挑战与民主决策问题联系起来。然后,文章总结了当代关于决策和政治协商方法(协商民主方法)的思想和实践。这为公民小组项目的概述提供了背景,该项目旨在(i)获取有关修改公民小组程序的信息,以增强有特殊教育需求和残疾的年轻人的参与;(ii)产生比最近的英国教育政策更细致、更有根据和更综合的包容性政策理念。然后介绍公民小组的组织。计划分两个阶段进行,由有或没有特殊教育需要和残疾的青年、他们的父母和教育专业人员组成一个小组。该小组通过面试进行评估。结果表明,精心准备差异化和基于优势的方法来运行小组的重要性。几乎所有关于改善学校包容性的想法都是针对所有学生的一般性学校改革,其中一些方面与特殊教育需求和残疾有关。讨论了该项目的意义,因为它使所有年轻人都做好参与民主进程的准备,这是民主公民身份的一个基本方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: This well-established and respected journal covers the whole range of learning difficulties relating to children in mainstream and special schools. It is widely read by nasen members as well as other practitioners, administrators advisers, teacher educators and researchers in the UK and overseas. The British Journal of Special Education is concerned with a wide range of special educational needs, and covers all levels of education pre-school, school, and post-school.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信