Consensus guideline for the management of colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35869
Kurt S. Schultz MD, Varun V. Bansal MBBS, Michael M. Wach MD, Neal Bhutiani MD, PhD, Frederick A. Godley IV MD, MBA, Jaeyun (Jane) Wang MD, Muhammad Talha Waheed MBBS, Joanna T. Buchheit MD, Emily Papai MD, Susan Campbell MD, Lauren E. Schleimer MD, David G. Su MD, Kiran K. Turaga MD, MPH, Craig G. Gunderson MD, Michael G. White MD, MSc, Abhineet Uppal MD, Kanwal P. S. Raghav MBBS, MD, Daniel M. Labow MD, MSc, Umut Sarpel MD, MSc, Ardaman P. Shergill MD, John Paul Shen MD, Cathy Eng MD, Michael B. Foote MD, Joel M. Baumgartner MD, Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Consortium Group
{"title":"Consensus guideline for the management of colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases","authors":"Kurt S. Schultz MD,&nbsp;Varun V. Bansal MBBS,&nbsp;Michael M. Wach MD,&nbsp;Neal Bhutiani MD, PhD,&nbsp;Frederick A. Godley IV MD, MBA,&nbsp;Jaeyun (Jane) Wang MD,&nbsp;Muhammad Talha Waheed MBBS,&nbsp;Joanna T. Buchheit MD,&nbsp;Emily Papai MD,&nbsp;Susan Campbell MD,&nbsp;Lauren E. Schleimer MD,&nbsp;David G. Su MD,&nbsp;Kiran K. Turaga MD, MPH,&nbsp;Craig G. Gunderson MD,&nbsp;Michael G. White MD, MSc,&nbsp;Abhineet Uppal MD,&nbsp;Kanwal P. S. Raghav MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Daniel M. Labow MD, MSc,&nbsp;Umut Sarpel MD, MSc,&nbsp;Ardaman P. Shergill MD,&nbsp;John Paul Shen MD,&nbsp;Cathy Eng MD,&nbsp;Michael B. Foote MD,&nbsp;Joel M. Baumgartner MD,&nbsp;Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Consortium Group","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The peritoneum is a common site of metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC), yet controversy exists regarding optimal treatment strategies. These guidelines describe the results of a national consensus addressing the management of CRC with peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM). An update of the 2018 Chicago consensus guidelines was conducted with a modified Delphi technique. Two rounds of voting were performed to assess agreement levels on two clinical management pathways regarding synchronous and metachronous CRC-PM. Supporting evidence was evaluated via rapid literature reviews. The overall level of evidence was low in the existing literature. Of 145 participants in the first round, 136 (96.8%) responded in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved in most pathway blocks. For both pathways, early referral to a peritoneal surface malignancy center should be made for patients with CRC-PM. For the synchronous pathway, upfront cytoreductive surgery was deemphasized in favor of systemic therapy. For the metachronous pathway, risk stratification via clinical and pathological features was revised. For both pathways, surveillance strategies were added, including only a weak recommendation for circulating tumor DNA testing, given limited evidence of its utility in detecting and monitoring PM. The consensus-driven clinical pathways provide valuable guidance for the management of CRC-PM. There remains a need for high-quality evidence and prospective multicenter trials in this domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35869","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The peritoneum is a common site of metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC), yet controversy exists regarding optimal treatment strategies. These guidelines describe the results of a national consensus addressing the management of CRC with peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM). An update of the 2018 Chicago consensus guidelines was conducted with a modified Delphi technique. Two rounds of voting were performed to assess agreement levels on two clinical management pathways regarding synchronous and metachronous CRC-PM. Supporting evidence was evaluated via rapid literature reviews. The overall level of evidence was low in the existing literature. Of 145 participants in the first round, 136 (96.8%) responded in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved in most pathway blocks. For both pathways, early referral to a peritoneal surface malignancy center should be made for patients with CRC-PM. For the synchronous pathway, upfront cytoreductive surgery was deemphasized in favor of systemic therapy. For the metachronous pathway, risk stratification via clinical and pathological features was revised. For both pathways, surveillance strategies were added, including only a weak recommendation for circulating tumor DNA testing, given limited evidence of its utility in detecting and monitoring PM. The consensus-driven clinical pathways provide valuable guidance for the management of CRC-PM. There remains a need for high-quality evidence and prospective multicenter trials in this domain.

结直肠癌伴腹膜转移治疗的共识指南
腹膜是结直肠癌(CRC)转移的常见部位,但关于最佳治疗策略存在争议。这些指南描述了解决CRC伴腹膜转移(CRC- pm)管理的全国共识的结果。采用改进的德尔菲技术对2018年芝加哥共识指南进行了更新。进行两轮投票以评估同步和非同步CRC-PM两种临床管理途径的一致性水平。通过快速文献回顾评估支持性证据。在现有文献中,证据的总体水平较低。在第一轮的145名参与者中,有136人(96.8%)在第二轮中得到了回应。在大多数途径块中达成了90%以上的共识。对于这两种途径,CRC-PM患者应及早转诊至腹膜表面恶性肿瘤中心。对于同步通路,不强调前期细胞减少手术,而倾向于全身治疗。对于异时途径,根据临床和病理特征进行风险分层。对于这两种途径,增加了监测策略,包括仅弱推荐循环肿瘤DNA检测,因为其在检测和监测PM方面的效用证据有限。共识驱动的临床路径为CRC-PM的管理提供了有价值的指导。在这一领域仍然需要高质量的证据和前瞻性的多中心试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信