Consensus guideline for the management of peritoneal mesothelioma

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35868
Leanne M. Brown MD, Sarah G. Wilkins BS, Varun V. Bansal MBBS, David G. Su MD, Jorge Gomez-Mayorga MD, Kiran K. Turaga MD, MPH, Craig G. Gunderson MD, SFHM, Byrne Lee MD, Garrett M. Nash MD, John L. Hays MD, PhD, Kanwal P. Raghav MBBS, MD, Aliya L. Husain MD, Michael D. Kluger MD, MPH, Marjorie G. Zauderer MD, Hedy L. Kindler MD, H. Richard Alexander MD, Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Consortium Group
{"title":"Consensus guideline for the management of peritoneal mesothelioma","authors":"Leanne M. Brown MD,&nbsp;Sarah G. Wilkins BS,&nbsp;Varun V. Bansal MBBS,&nbsp;David G. Su MD,&nbsp;Jorge Gomez-Mayorga MD,&nbsp;Kiran K. Turaga MD, MPH,&nbsp;Craig G. Gunderson MD, SFHM,&nbsp;Byrne Lee MD,&nbsp;Garrett M. Nash MD,&nbsp;John L. Hays MD, PhD,&nbsp;Kanwal P. Raghav MBBS, MD,&nbsp;Aliya L. Husain MD,&nbsp;Michael D. Kluger MD, MPH,&nbsp;Marjorie G. Zauderer MD,&nbsp;Hedy L. Kindler MD,&nbsp;H. Richard Alexander MD,&nbsp;Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Consortium Group","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM) poses significant challenges because of its rare incidence, heterogeneity, and limited clinical evidence. This commentary describes results from a national consensus aimed at addressing the management of PeM. An update of the 2018 Chicago consensus guidelines was conducted with a modified Delphi technique, which encompassed two rounds of voting. The levels of agreement for various pathway blocks were assessed. Of 101 participants responding in the first round of modified Delphi voting, 95 (94%) responded in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved in five of six and six of six pathway blocks in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. Observation was recommended for benign neoplasms, with guidance for interventions in the presence of symptoms or concerning clinicopathological features. For malignant pathology, management was outlined on the basis of a multidisciplinary assessment of patient characteristics, disease histology, and predictive success of medical and surgical interventions. Additional emphasis was placed on multimodal therapy for intermediate-risk and appropriate high-risk patients. A rapid review demonstrated the limited availability of data and inconclusive findings regarding optimal systemic therapy timing. There was unanimous support for considering clinical trial enrollment. Given the limited evidence, the consensus-driven pathway provides essential guidance regarding the management of PeM. To further direct clinical care, additional dedicated research to generate higher quality evidence is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35868","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The treatment of peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM) poses significant challenges because of its rare incidence, heterogeneity, and limited clinical evidence. This commentary describes results from a national consensus aimed at addressing the management of PeM. An update of the 2018 Chicago consensus guidelines was conducted with a modified Delphi technique, which encompassed two rounds of voting. The levels of agreement for various pathway blocks were assessed. Of 101 participants responding in the first round of modified Delphi voting, 95 (94%) responded in the second round. Over 90% consensus was achieved in five of six and six of six pathway blocks in rounds 1 and 2, respectively. Observation was recommended for benign neoplasms, with guidance for interventions in the presence of symptoms or concerning clinicopathological features. For malignant pathology, management was outlined on the basis of a multidisciplinary assessment of patient characteristics, disease histology, and predictive success of medical and surgical interventions. Additional emphasis was placed on multimodal therapy for intermediate-risk and appropriate high-risk patients. A rapid review demonstrated the limited availability of data and inconclusive findings regarding optimal systemic therapy timing. There was unanimous support for considering clinical trial enrollment. Given the limited evidence, the consensus-driven pathway provides essential guidance regarding the management of PeM. To further direct clinical care, additional dedicated research to generate higher quality evidence is needed.

腹膜间皮瘤治疗的共识指南
腹膜间皮瘤(PeM)的治疗由于其罕见的发病率、异质性和有限的临床证据而面临着巨大的挑战。本评论描述了旨在解决PeM管理的全国共识的结果。2018年芝加哥共识指南的更新采用了改进的德尔菲技术,其中包括两轮投票。评估了各种通路阻滞的一致程度。在第一轮修正德尔菲投票中做出回应的101位参与者中,有95位(94%)在第二轮做出回应。在第1轮和第2轮中,6个通路块中的5个和6个分别达到了90%以上的共识。建议对良性肿瘤进行观察,并在出现症状或涉及临床病理特征时指导干预。对于恶性病理,治疗是基于对患者特征、疾病组织学和预测成功的医学和外科干预的多学科评估。额外的重点放在多模式治疗中危和适当的高危患者。一项快速审查表明,关于最佳全身治疗时机的数据可用性有限,结果不确定。一致支持考虑临床试验入组。鉴于证据有限,共识驱动途径为PeM管理提供了必要的指导。为了进一步指导临床护理,需要更多的专门研究来产生更高质量的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信