Applying the Key Biodiversity Area Standard to Important Sites for Sharks

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Charlotte Boyd, Ryan Charles, Emiliano García-Rodríguez, Adriana Gonzalez-Pestana, Peter M. Kyne, Christoph A. Rohner, Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara, Rima W. Jabado
{"title":"Applying the Key Biodiversity Area Standard to Important Sites for Sharks","authors":"Charlotte Boyd,&nbsp;Ryan Charles,&nbsp;Emiliano García-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Adriana Gonzalez-Pestana,&nbsp;Peter M. Kyne,&nbsp;Christoph A. Rohner,&nbsp;Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara,&nbsp;Rima W. Jabado","doi":"10.1111/conl.13117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework commits nations to conserving 30% of coastal and marine areas, “especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity.” Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) provide a standardized approach for recognizing sites holding a significant proportion of the global population or extent of species or ecosystems. However, concerns about the relevance of this approach for broadly distributed and/or highly mobile aquatic vertebrates prompted development of parallel approaches focused on critical areas for life-history processes, including Important Shark and Ray Areas (ISRAs). We examine these approaches and assess whether important areas for sharks, rays, and chimaeras (“sharks”) can qualify as KBAs, by applying the KBA criteria to ISRAs. One fifth of ISRAs could be recognized as KBAs. KBAs could be recognized for three quarters of globally threatened and two thirds of non-threatened restricted-range sharks based on published range maps. For broadly distributed species, additional information (e.g., on aggregations) is needed to recognize important sites as KBAs. Our results show that these approaches are complementary, highlighting the potential for ISRAs to contribute to KBA assessments while ensuring important sites for sharks are mapped and available to inform government actions to meet global commitments for conserving biodiversity in coastal and marine areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.13117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.13117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework commits nations to conserving 30% of coastal and marine areas, “especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity.” Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) provide a standardized approach for recognizing sites holding a significant proportion of the global population or extent of species or ecosystems. However, concerns about the relevance of this approach for broadly distributed and/or highly mobile aquatic vertebrates prompted development of parallel approaches focused on critical areas for life-history processes, including Important Shark and Ray Areas (ISRAs). We examine these approaches and assess whether important areas for sharks, rays, and chimaeras (“sharks”) can qualify as KBAs, by applying the KBA criteria to ISRAs. One fifth of ISRAs could be recognized as KBAs. KBAs could be recognized for three quarters of globally threatened and two thirds of non-threatened restricted-range sharks based on published range maps. For broadly distributed species, additional information (e.g., on aggregations) is needed to recognize important sites as KBAs. Our results show that these approaches are complementary, highlighting the potential for ISRAs to contribute to KBA assessments while ensuring important sites for sharks are mapped and available to inform government actions to meet global commitments for conserving biodiversity in coastal and marine areas.

Abstract Image

重点生物多样性区域标准在鲨鱼重要栖息地的应用
《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》要求各国保护30%的沿海和海洋地区,“特别是对生物多样性特别重要的地区”。关键生物多样性区(KBAs)提供了一种标准化的方法来识别拥有全球人口或物种或生态系统的重要比例的地点。然而,对这种方法对广泛分布和/或高度流动的水生脊椎动物的相关性的担忧促使了平行方法的发展,这些方法集中在生活史过程的关键区域,包括重要的鲨鱼和鳐鱼区域(ISRAs)。我们研究了这些方法,并通过将KBA标准应用于isra,评估鲨鱼、鳐鱼和嵌合体(“鲨鱼”)的重要区域是否符合KBA的条件。以色列的五分之一可以被认为是巴勒斯坦自治当局。根据已公布的范围图,可以识别四分之三的全球受威胁鲨鱼和三分之二的非受威胁限制范围鲨鱼的栖息地。对于广泛分布的物种,需要额外的信息(例如,关于聚集的信息)来识别重要的位点作为KBAs。我们的研究结果表明,这些方法是互补的,突出了isra为KBA评估做出贡献的潜力,同时确保重要的鲨鱼栖息地被绘制出来,并为政府行动提供信息,以履行保护沿海和海洋地区生物多样性的全球承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信