Decolonising literacy assessments in Oman: Curriculum-based measurements and power dynamics

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Mahmoud Mohamed Emam, Ehab Mohamed Naguib Omara
{"title":"Decolonising literacy assessments in Oman: Curriculum-based measurements and power dynamics","authors":"Mahmoud Mohamed Emam,&nbsp;Ehab Mohamed Naguib Omara","doi":"10.1111/1467-8578.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the impact of curriculum-based measurements (CBMs) on literacy assessment in Omani schools, with a focus on how these tools affect Emergent and Proficient Readers. Grounded in the concepts of graphocentrism and ableism, the research highlights the systemic biases embedded within standard literacy practices that favour written language and normative learning trajectories. Through the analysis of literacy outcomes among Grade 1 students aged between six and seven years, the study reveals significant performance disparities, indicating that current assessment practices disproportionately benefit Proficient Readers while marginalising those with diverse learning needs. The findings underscore the need for a decolonising approach to literacy that incorporates multi-literacies and culturally relevant pedagogies, advocating for educational reforms that recognise and value the diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds of students. By shifting toward more inclusive assessment methods, Oman can better address educational inequities and foster an environment where all students have the opportunity to succeed. This research contributes to the global discourse on educational equity, suggesting that literacy assessments be restructured to ensure inclusivity and fairness in the evaluation of student competencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46054,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Special Education","volume":"52 2","pages":"272-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://nasenjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.70029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of curriculum-based measurements (CBMs) on literacy assessment in Omani schools, with a focus on how these tools affect Emergent and Proficient Readers. Grounded in the concepts of graphocentrism and ableism, the research highlights the systemic biases embedded within standard literacy practices that favour written language and normative learning trajectories. Through the analysis of literacy outcomes among Grade 1 students aged between six and seven years, the study reveals significant performance disparities, indicating that current assessment practices disproportionately benefit Proficient Readers while marginalising those with diverse learning needs. The findings underscore the need for a decolonising approach to literacy that incorporates multi-literacies and culturally relevant pedagogies, advocating for educational reforms that recognise and value the diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds of students. By shifting toward more inclusive assessment methods, Oman can better address educational inequities and foster an environment where all students have the opportunity to succeed. This research contributes to the global discourse on educational equity, suggesting that literacy assessments be restructured to ensure inclusivity and fairness in the evaluation of student competencies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

阿曼的非殖民化扫盲评估:基于课程的测量和权力动态
本研究考察了基于课程的测量(CBMs)对阿曼学校读写能力评估的影响,重点关注这些工具如何影响新兴读者和熟练读者。该研究以文字中心主义和残疾主义的概念为基础,强调了标准扫盲实践中存在的系统性偏见,这些实践倾向于书面语言和规范的学习轨迹。通过对6至7岁一年级学生读写能力结果的分析,该研究揭示了显著的表现差异,表明当前的评估做法不成比例地有利于熟练读者,而边缘化了具有不同学习需求的学生。研究结果强调,需要采取一种非殖民化的扫盲方法,将多元扫盲和与文化相关的教学法结合起来,倡导承认和重视学生不同语言和文化背景的教育改革。通过转向更具包容性的评估方法,阿曼可以更好地解决教育不公平问题,营造一个所有学生都有机会成功的环境。这项研究有助于全球教育公平的讨论,建议对读写能力评估进行重组,以确保学生能力评估的包容性和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: This well-established and respected journal covers the whole range of learning difficulties relating to children in mainstream and special schools. It is widely read by nasen members as well as other practitioners, administrators advisers, teacher educators and researchers in the UK and overseas. The British Journal of Special Education is concerned with a wide range of special educational needs, and covers all levels of education pre-school, school, and post-school.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信