Correction to “Evaluating routine agronomic soil tests for coastal soil salinity detection in the Mid-Atlantic”

Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America Pub Date : 2025-06-25 DOI:10.1002/saj2.70097

{"title":"Correction to “Evaluating routine agronomic soil tests for coastal soil salinity detection in the Mid-Atlantic”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/saj2.70097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pokhrel, S., Blew, W., Miller, J. O., & Shober, A. L. (2025). Evaluating routine agronomic soil tests for coastal soil salinity detection in the mid-Atlantic. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 89(3), e70075. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70075We apologize for the error and any confusion it may have caused.In the third paragraph of Section 3.4, “Relationships between Mehlich-3 and ammonium acetate SCR vs SAR” in the Results and Discussion section, “The relationship between ESPSAR and SCRM3 was strong (r2 = .84; p < .001; Figure 5a). Relationships between SAR and SCRAA(acid) for acidic soil (r2 = .89; p < .001; SAR = 0.26 +0.53 SCRAA(acid) for acidic soil), SCRAA(alkaline) for alkaline soil (r2 = .87; p < .001; SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCRAA(alkaline) for alkaline soil), and SCRM3 (r2 = .83, p < .001; Figure 5b) were also strong” was incorrect, and this should have read “The relationship between ESPSAR and SCRM3 was strong (r2 = .87; p < .001; Figure 5a). Relationships between SAR and SCRAA(acid) for acidic soil (r2 = .89; p < .001; SAR = 0.26 +0.53 SCRAA(acid) for acidic soil), SCRAA(alkaline) for alkaline soil (r2 = .87; p < .001; SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCRAA(alkaline) for alkaline soil), and SCRM3 (r2 = .87, p < .001; Figure 5b) were also strong.”We apologize for these errors.","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"89 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70097","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.70097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pokhrel, S., Blew, W., Miller, J. O., & Shober, A. L. (2025). Evaluating routine agronomic soil tests for coastal soil salinity detection in the mid-Atlantic. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 89(3), e70075. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70075

We apologize for the error and any confusion it may have caused.

In the third paragraph of Section 3.4, “Relationships between Mehlich-3 and ammonium acetate SCR vs SAR” in the Results and Discussion section, “The relationship between ESP_SAR and SCR_M3 was strong (r² = .84; p < .001; Figure 5a). Relationships between SAR and SCR_AA(acid) for acidic soil (r² = .89; p < .001; SAR = 0.26 +0.53 SCR_AA(acid) for acidic soil), SCR_AA(alkaline) for alkaline soil (r² = .87; p < .001; SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCR_AA(alkaline) for alkaline soil), and SCR_M3 (r² = .83, p < .001; Figure 5b) were also strong” was incorrect, and this should have read “The relationship between ESP_SAR and SCR_M3 was strong (r² = .87; p < .001; Figure 5a). Relationships between SAR and SCR_AA(acid) for acidic soil (r² = .89; p < .001; SAR = 0.26 +0.53 SCR_AA(acid) for acidic soil), SCR_AA(alkaline) for alkaline soil (r² = .87; p < .001; SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCR_AA(alkaline) for alkaline soil), and SCR_M3 (r² = .87, p < .001; Figure 5b) were also strong.”

We apologize for these errors.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

对“评估大西洋中部沿海土壤盐度检测的常规农艺土壤试验”的更正

波克雷，S.，布鲁，W.，米勒，J. O., &；肖伯，a.l.（2025）。评估大西洋中部沿海土壤盐度检测的常规农艺土壤试验。水土保持学报，30(3),344 - 344。https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70075We为这个错误和它可能造成的任何混乱道歉。在结果和讨论部分3.4节“Mehlich-3和乙酸铵SCR vs SAR的关系”的第三段中，“ESPSAR和SCRM3之间的关系很强(r2 = .84；p & lt;措施;图5 a)。酸性土壤SAR与SCRAA（酸）的关系(r2 = 0.89；p & lt;措施;SAR = 0.26 +0.53：酸性土壤SCRAA（酸性），碱性土壤SCRAA（碱性）(r2 = 0.87；p & lt;措施;SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCRAA（碱性），SCRM3 (r2 = 0.83, p <；措施;图5b)也很强”是不正确的，这应该是“ESPSAR和SCRM3之间的关系很强(r2 = .87；p & lt;措施;图5 a)。酸性土壤SAR与SCRAA（酸）的关系(r2 = 0.89；p & lt;措施;SAR = 0.26 +0.53：酸性土壤SCRAA（酸性），碱性土壤SCRAA（碱性）(r2 = 0.87；p & lt;措施;SAR = -0.91+ 0.47 SCRAA（碱性），SCRM3 (r2 = 0.87, p <；措施;图5b)也很强。”我们为这些错误道歉。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America

自引率

0.00%

发文量