How primary school students use their disciplinary drawings to navigate between everyday and scientific discourses of water

IF 3.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Bodil Sundberg, Johanna Andersson, Sofie Areljung, Carina Hermansson and Marianne Skoog
{"title":"How primary school students use their disciplinary drawings to navigate between everyday and scientific discourses of water","authors":"Bodil Sundberg, Johanna Andersson, Sofie Areljung, Carina Hermansson and Marianne Skoog","doi":"10.1039/D4RP00080C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this study, we investigate how young students can make use of their own disciplinary drawings to support transitions between everyday and scientific discourses of water. The empirical data consists of video-recorded stimulated recall interviews with six student pairs (age 8 years), conducted six months after they had been introduced to a water theme that included disciplinary drawing techniques. During the interviews, we provided students with their drawings as recall material. To stimulate a stalled discussion further or to support a new line of thought, we also asked supporting questions and provided the students with plastic models of water molecules, and a bottle of water. To trace their reasoning over time during the interview, the empirical material was used to construct semantic profiles for all student pairs underpinned by Legitimation Code Theory (LCT). Our findings show that most students used their drawings to bridge everyday experiences and scientific explanations of phenomena involving water. The plastic models and the water bottle however had varying effects, sometimes leading to adding a scientific discourse, and sometimes leading to off-topic reasoning. The students generally needed adult guidance to use their own drawings for navigating between everyday and scientific reasoning. However, our findings also show that some students were able to independently use their drawings to move between everyday and scientific discourse, in a way that suggests a gradual deepening of their understanding of the chemical properties of water. Based on these findings, we advocate for emergent disciplinary drawing, in combination with guided discussions, as an age-appropriate method for supporting primary students to navigate between everyday and scientific discourses in chemistry class. This approach could ensure that the educational value of students' creative efforts when drawing extends beyond the moment of creation, to also foster a richer language that can open for new ways of understanding and making sense of the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 3","pages":" 631-646"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/rp/d4rp00080c?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/rp/d4rp00080c","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we investigate how young students can make use of their own disciplinary drawings to support transitions between everyday and scientific discourses of water. The empirical data consists of video-recorded stimulated recall interviews with six student pairs (age 8 years), conducted six months after they had been introduced to a water theme that included disciplinary drawing techniques. During the interviews, we provided students with their drawings as recall material. To stimulate a stalled discussion further or to support a new line of thought, we also asked supporting questions and provided the students with plastic models of water molecules, and a bottle of water. To trace their reasoning over time during the interview, the empirical material was used to construct semantic profiles for all student pairs underpinned by Legitimation Code Theory (LCT). Our findings show that most students used their drawings to bridge everyday experiences and scientific explanations of phenomena involving water. The plastic models and the water bottle however had varying effects, sometimes leading to adding a scientific discourse, and sometimes leading to off-topic reasoning. The students generally needed adult guidance to use their own drawings for navigating between everyday and scientific reasoning. However, our findings also show that some students were able to independently use their drawings to move between everyday and scientific discourse, in a way that suggests a gradual deepening of their understanding of the chemical properties of water. Based on these findings, we advocate for emergent disciplinary drawing, in combination with guided discussions, as an age-appropriate method for supporting primary students to navigate between everyday and scientific discourses in chemistry class. This approach could ensure that the educational value of students' creative efforts when drawing extends beyond the moment of creation, to also foster a richer language that can open for new ways of understanding and making sense of the world.

小学生如何使用他们的学科绘画在日常和科学的水话语之间导航
在这项研究中,我们调查了年轻学生如何利用他们自己的学科图纸来支持日常和科学话语之间的过渡。实证数据包括对六对学生(8岁)进行的录像刺激回忆访谈,在他们被介绍了包括学科绘画技巧的水主题六个月后进行。在访谈中,我们为学生提供了他们的图画作为回忆材料。为了进一步激发停滞的讨论或支持新的思路,我们还提出了支持性问题,并为学生提供了水分子的塑料模型和一瓶水。为了在访谈过程中追踪他们的推理,我们使用了经验材料来构建基于合法性代码理论(LCT)的所有学生对的语义概况。我们的研究结果表明,大多数学生使用他们的绘画来连接日常经验和涉及水的现象的科学解释。然而,塑料模型和水瓶有不同的效果,有时会导致添加科学话语,有时会导致偏离主题的推理。学生们通常需要成人的指导来使用他们自己的图纸在日常和科学推理之间导航。然而,我们的研究结果也表明,一些学生能够独立地使用他们的绘画在日常和科学话语之间移动,这表明他们对水的化学性质的理解逐渐加深。基于这些发现,我们提倡在指导讨论的基础上进行紧急学科绘画,作为一种适合年龄的方法,支持小学生在化学课上在日常和科学话语之间进行导航。这种方法可以确保学生在绘画时创造性努力的教育价值超越创作的时刻,也可以培养一种更丰富的语言,为理解和理解世界开辟新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信