Utility of creative exercises as an assessment tool for revealing student conceptions in organic chemistry†

IF 3.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Krystal Grieger and Alexey Leontyev
{"title":"Utility of creative exercises as an assessment tool for revealing student conceptions in organic chemistry†","authors":"Krystal Grieger and Alexey Leontyev","doi":"10.1039/D4RP00310A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Creative exercises (CEs) consist of open-ended prompts to which students provide a series of relevant, distinct, and accurate statements, thus requiring that students make connections between concepts. In this study, CEs were incorporated into a one-semester <em>Survey of Organic Chemistry</em> course to identify what connections between chemistry concepts students made and what incorrect conceptions or misconceptions about chemistry students held. Students (<em>N</em> = 79) enrolled in the course first completed a practice CE as an in-class group activity followed by individually responding to a CE bonus problem on each of their four course exams. The number of different concepts students addressed for each CE increased over the semester, indicating that students made increasing content connections about course material; however, misconceptions about early concepts, such as nomenclature and assigning configurations, remained consistent throughout the semester. Furthermore, the CEs were found to be instrumental in shedding light on misconceptions and knowledge structures of students across varying performance levels. Overall, students reported that they viewed the CEs favorably and would like to see CEs incorporated in future courses.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 3","pages":" 603-618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/rp/d4rp00310a","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creative exercises (CEs) consist of open-ended prompts to which students provide a series of relevant, distinct, and accurate statements, thus requiring that students make connections between concepts. In this study, CEs were incorporated into a one-semester Survey of Organic Chemistry course to identify what connections between chemistry concepts students made and what incorrect conceptions or misconceptions about chemistry students held. Students (N = 79) enrolled in the course first completed a practice CE as an in-class group activity followed by individually responding to a CE bonus problem on each of their four course exams. The number of different concepts students addressed for each CE increased over the semester, indicating that students made increasing content connections about course material; however, misconceptions about early concepts, such as nomenclature and assigning configurations, remained consistent throughout the semester. Furthermore, the CEs were found to be instrumental in shedding light on misconceptions and knowledge structures of students across varying performance levels. Overall, students reported that they viewed the CEs favorably and would like to see CEs incorporated in future courses.

创造性练习作为揭示学生有机化学概念的评估工具的效用
创造性练习(ce)由开放式提示组成,学生提供一系列相关的、独特的和准确的陈述,因此要求学生在概念之间建立联系。本研究将ce纳入一学期的有机化学课程调查,以确定学生的化学概念之间的联系,以及学生对化学的错误概念或误解。参加课程的学生(N = 79)首先完成了一个实践CE作为课堂小组活动,然后在他们的四门课程考试中分别回答一个CE奖励问题。学生在每个CE中涉及的不同概念的数量在学期中有所增加,这表明学生对课程材料的内容联系越来越多;然而,对早期概念的误解,如命名法和分配配置,贯穿整个学期。此外,研究还发现,在不同表现水平的学生的误解和知识结构方面,ce是有用的。总的来说,学生们报告说他们看好ce,并希望在未来的课程中看到ce。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信