Impact of Pharmacist Telehealth Comanagement for Heart Failure

D. Steven Fox MD , Nadine Zawadski PhD , Kimberly Buss MD , Angela Leahy PhamD , Q. Laura Zhang PharmD , Yu Christine Chan BS Pharm
{"title":"Impact of Pharmacist Telehealth Comanagement for Heart Failure","authors":"D. Steven Fox MD ,&nbsp;Nadine Zawadski PhD ,&nbsp;Kimberly Buss MD ,&nbsp;Angela Leahy PhamD ,&nbsp;Q. Laura Zhang PharmD ,&nbsp;Yu Christine Chan BS Pharm","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) imposes high morbidity and mortality burdens. Outcomes improve significantly with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), but patients infrequently achieve target regimens in practice.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of telehealth-delivered pharmacist comanagement for patients with HFrEF vs usual care to: 1) achieve goal GDMT therapy; and 2) reduce health care utilization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This nonrandomized controlled study, spanning 2022 to 2023, analyzed a health care delivery improvement project at an integrated health care network. In-network Medicare recipients with a HFrEF diagnosis (based on chart review) were divided into those covered by the network’s risk-sharing agreement (intervention group) vs otherwise similar (comparison group) patients. A difference-in-difference analysis with inverse propensity weighting adjusted for observable risk factors. Intervention patients received medication reconciliation, new drug initiation, dose adjustments, and safety monitoring by program pharmacists via telehealth. Main outcome measures were hospitalizations and achievement of target GDMT therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 190 intervention and 277 comparison group patients. The relative risk of cardiac hospitalization in the intervention group (vs comparison group) was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.08-0.86; <em>P</em> = 0.026), with an adjusted absolute risk reduction of 14.2 hospitalizations per 100 patient-years. In the intervention group, the ORs for achieving 3+ and 4 GDMT classes (vs comparison) were 2.73 (95% CI: 1.91-3.87; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and 2.27 (95% CI: 1.29-4.01; <em>P</em> = 0.005), respectively. The adjusted absolute increase in patients on 3+ and 4 GDMT classes were 23% and 21%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A dedicated pharmacist comanagement telehealth program for patients with HFrEF proved effective at improving GDMT use and reducing cardiac hospitalizations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25003266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) imposes high morbidity and mortality burdens. Outcomes improve significantly with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), but patients infrequently achieve target regimens in practice.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of telehealth-delivered pharmacist comanagement for patients with HFrEF vs usual care to: 1) achieve goal GDMT therapy; and 2) reduce health care utilization.

Methods

This nonrandomized controlled study, spanning 2022 to 2023, analyzed a health care delivery improvement project at an integrated health care network. In-network Medicare recipients with a HFrEF diagnosis (based on chart review) were divided into those covered by the network’s risk-sharing agreement (intervention group) vs otherwise similar (comparison group) patients. A difference-in-difference analysis with inverse propensity weighting adjusted for observable risk factors. Intervention patients received medication reconciliation, new drug initiation, dose adjustments, and safety monitoring by program pharmacists via telehealth. Main outcome measures were hospitalizations and achievement of target GDMT therapy.

Results

There were 190 intervention and 277 comparison group patients. The relative risk of cardiac hospitalization in the intervention group (vs comparison group) was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.08-0.86; P = 0.026), with an adjusted absolute risk reduction of 14.2 hospitalizations per 100 patient-years. In the intervention group, the ORs for achieving 3+ and 4 GDMT classes (vs comparison) were 2.73 (95% CI: 1.91-3.87; P < 0.001) and 2.27 (95% CI: 1.29-4.01; P = 0.005), respectively. The adjusted absolute increase in patients on 3+ and 4 GDMT classes were 23% and 21%, respectively.

Conclusions

A dedicated pharmacist comanagement telehealth program for patients with HFrEF proved effective at improving GDMT use and reducing cardiac hospitalizations.
药师远程医疗管理对心力衰竭的影响
背景:心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)具有很高的发病率和死亡率。指南导向药物治疗(GDMT)的结果显著改善,但患者在实践中很少达到目标方案。目的本研究的目的是确定远程医疗提供药师管理对HFrEF患者的有效性与常规护理:1)实现目标GDMT治疗;2)减少卫生保健的利用。方法本非随机对照研究时间跨度为2022年至2023年,分析了某综合医疗保健网络的医疗服务改善项目。网络内诊断为HFrEF的医疗保险受助人(基于图表审查)被分为网络风险分担协议覆盖的患者(干预组)和其他相似的患者(对照组)。对可观察到的危险因素进行反倾向加权的差异分析。干预患者接受药物调解、新药物启动、剂量调整和安全监测,由项目药剂师通过远程医疗。主要结局指标为住院率和目标GDMT治疗的实现情况。结果干预组190例,对照组277例。干预组心脏住院的相对危险度(与对照组相比)为0.26 (95% CI: 0.08-0.86;P = 0.026),调整后的绝对风险降低14.2次/ 100患者年。在干预组中,达到3+和4级GDMT的or(与对照组相比)为2.73 (95% CI: 1.91-3.87;P & lt;0.001)和2.27 (95% CI: 1.29-4.01;P = 0.005)。3+级和4级GDMT患者调整后的绝对增幅分别为23%和21%。结论HFrEF患者专用药师管理远程医疗方案可有效提高GDMT的使用,降低心脏住院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC advances
JACC advances Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信